proper procedure regarding bug reports

[Brian Murray]

On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 09:32:26PM +0100, Patrick Freundt wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Brian Murray <brian at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> 
> > A good first step after reporting a new bug report is finding another
> > Ubuntu user who can recreate the bug report and subsequently confirm it
> > and set the bug's status to Confirmed.
> 
> So bug reporting requires a form of social network as pre-condition
> and Internet Relay Chat is still popular, no matter of all the
> problems.

No, I was replying to your specific question of:

"What would be such a next step?"[1]

Bug reporting does not "require[s] a form of social network" as the bug
was properly reported without one.  Rather to move the bug along the
triaging process usually requires other people to look at it and
indicate whether or not they also experience the bug.

[1]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-discuss/2010-January/010371.html
 
-- 
Brian Murray                                                 @ubuntu.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-discuss/attachments/20100105/97078c9e/attachment.sig>