ntfs-3g in Lucid
marguet at rutgers.edu
Sat Feb 13 18:05:29 UTC 2010
So glad to hear it will make it into Lucid! Logical choice or not, many of
us are forced to use large (fragmented, even!) NTFS drives because
high-throughput data acquisition or other machines unfortunately run
proprietary operating systems. Also, for collaboration and data-sharing, we
do not ship ext4 disks around =( So we have no option but to use NTFS, and
2009.4.4 wasn't cutting it.
Really appreciate everyone's work ensuring we won't have to manually upgrade
all our ntfs-3g on data analysis machines!
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Benjamin Drung <bdrung at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> Am Samstag, den 13.02.2010, 19:22 +0200 schrieb Timo Jyrinki:
> > 2010/2/11 Patrick Goetz <pgoetz at mail.utexas.edu>:
> > >> upgrade to get 2010.1.16 into testing:
> > >
> > > Doesn't look like it:
> > Just to note, it's still in unstable in Debian, possibly migrating
> > into testing on 20th if no new release critical bugs are filed against
> > it before that. However, lucid's DebianImportFreeze was already on
> > Thursday the 11th and because of the Ubuntu-specific changes it would
> > need manual syncing anyway. If you want to file a sync request, follow
> > instructions at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SyncRequestProcess and provide
> > all the needed information.
> We have already a merge request  and Colin Watson is working on it.
> BTW, syncs and sync request are only for unmodified packages. We need to
> do a merge, if the package was modified in Ubuntu.
>  https://launchpad.net/bugs/513197
> Benjamin Drung
> Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Maintainer (www.debian.org)
> Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
> Ubuntu-devel-discuss at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Ubuntu-devel-discuss