Icons in Place and System
farrisg at cc.mala.bc.ca
Tue Oct 13 20:23:22 UTC 2009
No that turns on icons for everything. I'm saying that Applications and
Places have icons but System doesn't and that looks unfinished and not
consistent. A paper cut if you will.
On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 15:17 -0400, Alvin Thompson wrote:
> I think they *are* missing by accident. If you select
> System-->Preferences-->Appearance-->'Interface' tab-->Show Icons in menus
> the icons come back. The fact that only a few menu items respect this
> setting is a bug, IMO.
> On 10/13/2009 01:24 PM, Matthew East wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Matthew Paul Thomas<mpt at canonical.com> wrote:
> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >> Hash: SHA1
> >> coz DS wrote on 12/10/09 17:05:
> >>> Hey all,
> >>> I am running ubuntu 9.10 right now fresh install... I noticed no
> >>> icons under System menu and a few missing from Places menu in Gnome.
> >> There are fewer icons in menus generally. Places and System are just two
> >> examples.
> > Shouldn't this be an all or nothing approach? I'm not attached to the
> > icons myself but it does look a bit inconsistent in these menus to
> > have some items without icons and other items (or submenu items) with
> > icons. It makes it look, at least to me, as if the icons are missing
> > by accident. Maybe it is worth discussing with upstream whether there
> > is widespread agreement on the right approach, and following that.
More information about the Ubuntu-devel-discuss