Large files under ubuntu do not appear to work
Stephan Hermann
sh at sourcecode.de
Thu Mar 26 07:13:59 UTC 2009
Moins,
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 20:38:31 +0100
Jan Claeys <lists at janc.be> wrote:
> Op woensdag 25-03-2009 om 16:19 uur [tijdzone +0000], schreef Scott
> James Remnant:
> > On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 15:26 +0000, Max Bowsher wrote:
> > > This assumes you buy into the SI's naming scheme and can say
> > > things like "kibibyte" and "tebibyte" without bursting into
> > > giggles or groaning in despair :-)
>
> > It isn't SI, it's IEEE
>
> I think it's IEEE, CIE & ISO now (although I can't be sure about ISO
> as it's not freely available, but IIRC there is something mentioned
> in the table of contents that is publicly available on some national
> standards organisations sites).
TBH, I just bursted into a laugh attack....for easyiness: 500 Gigabytes
as written on a Harddrive label are not the same as 500 Gigabytes
transfered over the Network (when you know HD vendor definition: kilo ==
1000 and Network vendor definition normally kilo == 1024)
Check for yourself...and be frustrated of different "standards" (which
makes be lol again now ;))
Regards,
\sh
--
Stephan '\sh' Hermann | OSS Developer &
Systemadministrator JID: sh at linux-server.org |
http://www.sourcecode.de/ GPG ID: 0xC098EFA8 |
http://leonov.tv/ 3D8B 5138 0852 DA7A B83F DCCB C189 E733 C098 EFA8
More information about the Ubuntu-devel-discuss
mailing list