handling extensions in a canonical (no pun intended)

Mackenzie Morgan macoafi at gmail.com
Sat Jun 13 00:22:40 UTC 2009


On Friday 12 June 2009 3:05:14 pm Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> Heya
> 
> This reminds me of per-user installed deb's (not supported) vs global
> install's which clog up every users. For one in Ubuntu we have e.g.
> plugins OOo in the repo. But if you install them there is no option
> for unpriviledged users to disable it =/ it's just gray in OO.o

I don't believe that's the case with Mozilla applications.  If you install a 
Firefox extension from the package manager right now, it is still possible for 
a user to disable it within their own local Firefox while still keeping it 
installed system-wide.

-- 
Mackenzie Morgan
http://ubuntulinuxtipstricks.blogspot.com
apt-get moo
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-discuss/attachments/20090612/a1c16f22/attachment.pgp>


More information about the Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list