shameful censoring of mono opposition
mpfink at gmail.com
Tue Jun 9 23:57:49 UTC 2009
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Christopher
Olah<christopherolah.co at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Ubuntu is a centralised entity. No external person can control e.g. why
>> we have a custom search in the home page of firefox by default. People
>> who can't tell the difference will keep using a "different" google, but
>> there is not even way to get some discussion around this (I tried in the
>> So if us really feel that this is risky (like it's risky for all
>> centralised organisations, including e.g. google and it's services) then
>> the only alternative is to develop a decentralised linux distribution.
> The fact that censorship is an intrinsic risk to any centralized Linux
> distro doesn't make it any more appropriate. If censorship is
> occurring, it needs to stop.
yes it does and the people behind the censorship need to be exposed
for what they really are
Only by destroying MONO can Linux be saved.
More information about the Ubuntu-devel-discuss