shameful censoring of mono opposition

[Mackenzie Morgan]

On Monday 08 June 2009 10:00:27 am Mark Fink wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 9:50 AM, Remco<remco47 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Luke L<lukehasnoname at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> This guy is trolling you hard. REALLY hard.
> >
> > Who is trolling me? I think Mark Fink can use some communication
> > skills, but he has a certain point somewhere deep down. Wine and Mono
> > are great interoperability efforts, but if Ubuntu is going to be using
> > it in the default install, then Microsoft can just say: "They can't
> > even create their own application framework!"
> 
> yes, this is one of the MANY reasons why MONO should be removed

Perhaps I misunderstand why the term "application framework" is any better 
than a pile of libraries and languages that work together, but I think it'd be 
extremely difficult for Microsoft to try to argue that .NET is older than GTK+, 
Qt, C, C++, and Python.

-- 
Mackenzie Morgan
http://ubuntulinuxtipstricks.blogspot.com
apt-get moo
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-discuss/attachments/20090608/c6ade922/attachment.sig>