shameful censoring of mono opposition

Mark Fink mpfink at
Mon Jun 8 11:49:32 UTC 2009

On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 2:37 AM, Stephan Hermann<sh at> wrote:
> Good Morning,
> On Sun, 7 Jun 2009 18:36:29 -0400
> Mark Fink <mpfink at> wrote:
>> [...removed totally annoying article...]
> As I'm not a MONO Fanboy myself...and sometimes boycott novell does
> write good articles...but please...
> Mono gives us a good way into the MS front...this could also be a point
> of view.
> And regarding Canonical...I wonder if Mark or Jane hired a lot of MONO
> people...I do think they have more python devs on their payrole then
> other companies...
> anyways...MONO is a technology and this technology belongs into Ubuntu
> or any other linux distribution. It helps people get rid of Windows in
> the first place.

no it doesn't, it helps spred the infectious disease MONO. it also
helps adict users to it.

> We can argue about "MS doesn't give us any rights on using it patent
> wise" (only to Novell) but this has really nothing to do with MONO...we
> have so many sources in our distros, which do have patent issues...why
> don't you scream about that? Oh, sorry, you want to watch videos, or
> listen to your MP3s...damn I forgot.

read boycottnovell, Roy has proven over and over again that MONO is
illegal for anyone but microvell.

> So please, power up your brain first...

maybe you should.

Only by destroying MONO can Linux be saved.

More information about the Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list