shameful censoring of mono opposition
Mackenzie Morgan
macoafi at gmail.com
Mon Jun 8 03:06:54 UTC 2009
On Sunday 07 June 2009 8:22:41 pm Mark Fink wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 8:12 PM, Christopher
> > So, your saying that theres not a single corporation that has ${Vital
> > Application} written in .net? I'm not saying that it was a good
> > choice, but that is the way it is and Ubuntu not supporting it makes
> > it difficult for them to leave MS.
>
> but that's not how MONO is being used. it is being used to poison our
> desktops with patented M$ technology with junk like banshee and tomboy
> and f-spot. if I wanted *.dll and *.exe's on my system I would just
> run WINDOWS
Filename extensions are how you choose your OS? Huh...alright, well, that's a
new one. You know I can name a shell script with .exe at the end and still
have the first line be "#! /bin/bash" right?
> but they are the people that are infiltrating ubuntu and canonical
> people like directhex and the gnome-do developer I forget the name
Jo is a nice fellow, met him at UDS. Didn't seem very much to be
infiltrating...more like sitting around being cheerful and chatting with
whatever folks sat down.
> > - How strong is the evidence for these accusations?
>
> there is proof posted in both articles
Please reread. The question was not "where is the proof?" but rather "*how
strong* is the proof?"
> > - Who is in a position to rectify this?
>
> I don't know that's why I'm writing here to get the MONO people kicked out
Ah, but that would be exclusionary and so...un-Ubuntu...
--
Mackenzie Morgan
http://ubuntulinuxtipstricks.blogspot.com
apt-get moo
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-discuss/attachments/20090607/2c1ae611/attachment.sig>
More information about the Ubuntu-devel-discuss
mailing list