shameful censoring of mono opposition

Mark Fink mpfink at gmail.com
Sun Jun 7 23:48:45 UTC 2009


On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 7:42 PM, Christopher
Olah<christopherolah.co at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I hope you get rid of MONO. only then can your reputations be restored.
>
> I'm sorry... You want Ubuntu to drop a FOSS program because it's
> developers are allegedly being problematic? I can't follow this train
> of thought.
>
> I don't think Mono is a particularly useful language myself, but
> people are using it and Canonical (and the FOSS community at large)
> not providing an implementation would just make people more locked
> into MS.


this is what the MONO developers want you to believe, but no one
really wants MONO. users still using MONO only do so because they've
been tricked by miquel & co who worship m$ and will do anything to
help them destroy linux.

this is all well documented at boycottnovell.com

>
>> I see you are shooting the messenger, steve.
>
> I might not be Steve, but I think you're over reacting...

no, I'm not. this is very serious.

>
> And  argumentum ad hominem is a logical fallacy, anyways.
>
>> the MONO camp has infiltrated canonical and now they are going around
>> censoring anything that proves MONO to be the poison that it is.
>
> I haven't had time to research your claims, but I'm inclined to say
> that if people are being censored it can be rectified without this
> sort of inflammatory response. Namely, the fact that people are aware
> of these claims means that situation will be rectified.
>

this is all well documented by the articles I linked to. please read
them so that you can rectify this.

-- 
Only by destroying MONO can Linux be saved.




More information about the Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list