Looking at Package Management for Karmic or Karmic+1
macoafi at gmail.com
Mon Apr 6 07:47:00 UTC 2009
On Monday 06 April 2009 3:22:10 am Erich Jansen wrote:
> Jan Claeys wrote:
> > Op maandag 06-04-2009 om 00:43 uur [tijdzone -0400], schreef Mackenzie
> > Morgan:
> >> On Sunday 05 April 2009 11:55:10 pm Jan Claeys wrote:
> >>> Actually, a running firefox shows you a warning and a restart button (or
> >>> at least it did?) if it's older than the on-disk version. I guess
> >>> that's part of the ubufox extension?
> >> Yes, it does, but um...that kinda sucks. "I, the computer, demand that
> >> the user, stop what you are doing and restart your browser NOW, losing
> >> your work in the process. This is not optional. I will barf if you try
> >> continue with your work or save it in any way, such as submitting that
> >> post you just spent an hour writing."
> > Doesn't restarting preserve the form contents? (I never really tried.)
> > Anyway there might be some issues with it indeed. Maybe firefox updates
> > should warn the users beforehand, somehow? I'm not sure how that would
> > work though. Maybe delaying upgrades until shutdown *is* the right
> > solution?
> Yes it will preserve all your data for the restart. (just tried it out
> in a VM)
Restarting FF keeps form contents too? I thought it only kept the tab list.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
More information about the Ubuntu-devel-discuss