poor performance hard disk IDE
Dane Mutters
dmutters at gmail.com
Tue Oct 28 13:57:00 UTC 2008
Stefano,
Agreed. I only used the one from kernel.org because I wanted to try out
a newer kernel. I did not, however, have to do any patching to use the
workaround. I don't see why it wouldn't work with a stock Ubuntu
kernel.
--Dane
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 11:15 +0100, Stefano Doni wrote:
> Thanks Dave for your willingness,
> but I think it is definitely better to fix this into Ubuntu stock
> kernel, so that other user will benefit from it!
>
>
> 2008/10/28 Dane Mutters <dmutters at gmail.com>
> Stefano,
>
> I'm currently using this workaround with kernel 2.6.26.5,
> downloaded
> from www.kernel.org, and compiled/installed using "The
> Old-Fashioned
> Debian
> Way" ( https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Kernel/Compile ).
> Attached is my most recent config file (compressed).
>
> --Dane
>
>
> On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 10:35 +0100, Stefano Doni wrote:
> > Thanks Dane,
> > is this workaround valid with stock kernels?
> >
> > Can other developers comment on this?
> >
> > I would not consider compiling my own kernel to be a
> solution for me,
> > I firmly believe it is better to use the stock Ubuntu one.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > 2008/10/28 Dane Mutters <dmutters at gmail.com>
> > I don't remember if I mentioned it on this list, but
> I
> > submitted a bug
> > (pertaining to Hardy) that at least SEEMS very
> similar to this
> > a while
> > ago. It has yet to be looked at.
> >
> >
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-meta/+bug/220349
> >
> > I managed to find a workaround by way of recompiling
> the
> > kernel and
> > blacklisting a module. Perhaps somebody will find
> this
> > useful.
> >
> > --Dane
> >
> >
>
>
More information about the Ubuntu-devel-discuss
mailing list