Do you really want developers to be on this list was (Re: Very bad status of hardware (especially wifi) support in ubuntu, due to the too many accumulated regressions)
macoafi at gmail.com
Fri Nov 14 03:43:30 UTC 2008
On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 21:12 -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 16:14:31 -0500 Mackenzie Morgan <macoafi at gmail.com>
> >I haven't bothered trying to use the GUI with my iwl4965 and WEP. I
> >just expect NM to not work when it comes to WEP.
> I have 4965 and it worked fine for me with KNetworkManager and WEP in
> Hardy. I have't had a need for WEP since I upgraded to Intrepid.
> As an aside, if people are truly concerned about privacy/security, they
> should be on WPA. WEP is trivial to break.
I know that, but until about two months ago, the network in the computer
science department at school (yeah, go figure) was WEP, so it was a sort
of "not-by-choice" thing for me. And visiting other people's houses,
WEP is often something you need to deal with.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the Ubuntu-devel-discuss