firefox and bad ssl certificates
macoafi at gmail.com
Thu May 8 02:14:04 UTC 2008
On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 22:05 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 May 2008 20:34, HggdH wrote:
> > 100% with you. But it all has to start with education, not just forcing
> > a new feature down the user's throat. For most casual users, this
> > education is -- from my own experience with casual and theoretically
> > technical users -- not easy. And I do understand X509 & friends.
> > On this point, I wonder if we are just making it a bit harder what most
> > users have been doing for ever. All we will get is grumbling, *unless*
> > we also provide clear, short, nice, reasonable, explanations.
> > Ah well.
> While we're on this topic, I think point number 5 in this essay bears
> Scott K
But point #4 says "hacking is cool" is dumb...though there'd be no Linux
kernel or GNU tools without hackers.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the Ubuntu-devel-discuss