LTS and release methodology

[(=?utf-8?q?=60=60-=5F-=C2=B4=C2=B4?=) -- Fernando]

Olá Krzysztof e a todos.

On Saturday 12 July 2008 10:00:42 Krzysztof Lichota wrote:
> Maybe if Ubuntu shipped with apt settings which would make backports
> repository lower priority and would require explicit installation of
> given version from backports it would be OK, but AFAIK it is not the
> case.
> -- 
> 	Krzysztof Lichota

I never understood why this is not the default and current way.
It sound to me the best option...
Can some one explain why we keep proposed with same priority as security?

-- 
BUGabundo  :o)
(``-_-´´)	http://Ubuntu.BUGabundo.net
Linux user #443786    GPG key 1024D/A1784EBB
My new micro-blog @ http://BUGabundo.net
ps. My emails tend to sound authority and aggressive. I'm sorry in advance. I'll try to be more assertive as time goes by...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-discuss/attachments/20080713/d3f60f1c/attachment.sig>