LTS and release methodology
Michael R. Head
burner at suppressingfire.org
Tue Jul 8 19:13:12 BST 2008
On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 00:47 +0100, Alexander Jones wrote:
> 2008/7/8 Evan <eapache at gmail.com>:
> > Mark Shuttleworth has already proposed something along these lines. I can't
> > find it at the moment, but it's in a post somewhere at markshuttleworth.com
> > I also think this would help significantly.
> I believe Mark proposed only a synchronisation on the six-monthly
> cycle. I am suggesting 2 years for major changes to the platform.
If two out of three of Red Hat (RHEL), Novell (SLES) and Debian
are willing to agree in advance on a date to the nearest month,
and thereby on a combination of kernel, compiler toolchain,
GNOME/KDE, X and OpenOffice versions, and agree to a six-month
and 2-3 year long term cycle, then I would happily realign
Ubuntu’s short and long-term cycles around that.
Michael R. Head <burner at suppressingfire.org>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 3259 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-discuss/attachments/20080708/aca926e1/attachment-0001.bin
More information about the Ubuntu-devel-discuss