LTS and release methodology
macoafi at gmail.com
Wed Jul 9 15:34:44 UTC 2008
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Matt Zimmerman <mdz at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 11:20:06AM -0400, Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 11:07 AM, Matt Zimmerman <mdz at ubuntu.com> wrote:
>> > In my opinion, nothing as esoteric as alternatives should be exposed in the
>> > desktop, any more than should reordering symlinks in /etc/rc?.d.
>> Isn't that what System -> Administration -> Services is?
> It isn't quite as bad, as it only allows things to be enabled and disabled,
> and only displays a subset of the startup scripts (unlike some similar
> tools, which allow the user to easily break their system).
> I wish we didn't need it, though.
I'd rather use that than update-rc.d. I may have Apache installed for
practicing PHP, but that doesn't mean I want it to auto-startup, and
there's no easier way to stop it.
Linux User #432169
ACM Member #3445683
http://ubuntulinuxtipstricks.blogspot.com <-my blog of Ubuntu stuff
More information about the Ubuntu-devel-discuss