gquigs at gmail.com
Tue Jan 15 15:38:05 GMT 2008
I outlined in my specification (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/No-Mono-by-Default)
how gThumb has more functionality than F-Spot, is more efficient memory wise
and takes up less space.
On Jan 15, 2008 8:19 AM, Scott James Remnant <scott at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 13:59 +0100, Wouter Stomp wrote:
> > On Jan 15, 2008 5:59 AM, Bryan Quigley <gquigs at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I was wondering what the reasoning was to get rid of gThumb in the
> > > install (ubuntu desktop package). Is their an application that has
> > > added to help people organize home movies that I missed?
> > To reduce duplication. F-spot is included to organize your photos (not
> > movies, but I don't think gthumb does that either?).
> Not to mention that nautilus and eog already handle 95% of gthumb's
> functionality. You can open a folder in Nautilus, browse the files
> within it, double-click to make them bigger and use Next/Previous
> buttons to move between them at full size.
> Scott James Remnant
> scott at ubuntu.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Ubuntu-devel-discuss