Proposal: cdrkit vs. cdrtools

Stephan Hermann sh at sourcecode.de
Sun Jan 13 14:17:11 GMT 2008


Dear Colleagues,

as I wrote on http://www.sourcecode.de/content/cdrkit-vs-cdrtools I
really wonder what way we should go.

Regarding the non-freeness of cdrtools, we should concentrate on getting
the cdrkit binaries to the upstream projects.

Most of the apps I found in debian/ubuntu, which are using mkisofs/cdrecord as exec calls, could be patched easily to use genisoimage/wodin.
Having an option compatiblity between e.g. cdrecord and wodin, this should work out of the box. 

Do you think it's worth the efford?

Regards,

\sh

PS: Discussion on u-d-d, Reply-To set please honour it.


-- 
SysAdmin, OSS Developer
GPG-Key ID: 0xC098EFA8 
Fingerprint: 3D8B 5138 0852 DA7A B83F  DCCB C189 E733 C098 EFA8
http://www.sourcecode.de/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 307 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-discuss/attachments/20080113/c8e3aeee/attachment.pgp 


More information about the Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list