Proposal: cdrkit vs. cdrtools

Forest Bond forest at
Mon Jan 14 13:51:12 UTC 2008


On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 03:17:11PM +0100, Stephan Hermann wrote:
> as I wrote on I
> really wonder what way we should go.
> Regarding the non-freeness of cdrtools, we should concentrate on getting
> the cdrkit binaries to the upstream projects.

Hold your horses, folks.

Didn't we just move back to cdrtools from cdrkit?  Weren't these issues
resolved, or something?

Debian seems to be happy.  Let's leave it be, hmm?

Forest Bond
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <>

More information about the Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list