Proposal: cdrkit vs. cdrtools

[Forest Bond]

Hi,

On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 03:17:11PM +0100, Stephan Hermann wrote:
> as I wrote on http://www.sourcecode.de/content/cdrkit-vs-cdrtools I
> really wonder what way we should go.
> 
> Regarding the non-freeness of cdrtools, we should concentrate on getting
> the cdrkit binaries to the upstream projects.

Hold your horses, folks.

Didn't we just move back to cdrtools from cdrkit?  Weren't these issues
resolved, or something?

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=270060

Debian seems to be happy.  Let's leave it be, hmm?

Thanks,
Forest
-- 
Forest Bond
http://www.alittletooquiet.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-discuss/attachments/20080114/f3651259/attachment.sig>