Miro (Re: New Programs for Hardy?)

[Evan]

I don't know about the average computer, but it probably varies quite a bit.
I'm typing this on a P3 1Ghz with 256MB of ram. Ubuntu runs moderately
slowly but easily survivable. Xubuntu runs decently. I'm a bit of a speed
freak though, so I installed the core bits from the alternate cd and built a
custom fluxbox setup from there. I'd say that this is about the lowest-end
pc you'll find normal Ubuntu installed on though.

Just my 2 cents

On 2/9/08, Conrad Knauer <atheoi at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Feb 9, 2008 4:29 AM, Vincenzo Ciancia <ciancia at di.unipi.it> wrote:
>
> > I personally love miro but can't still recommend it to my friends since
> > it really crashes a lot on ubuntu. Including such an application on the
> > default cd would,in my opinion, be not-so-good publicity for ubuntu.
>
>
> Out of curiosity, what version are you using? (0.9.8 from gutsy or the
> current 1.1.2 from Miro's repository)  Other people mentioned that its
> a bit of a resource hog (Vadim Peretokin wrote: "it was barely working
> on my 1.5Ghz, 512ram laptop") what kind of system do you have?
>
> And, generally speaking, what's the 'average computer' Ubuntu is
> targeting?  The System Requirements listed on
> https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Installation/SystemRequirements must
> be below what most people use Ubuntu on...
>
>
> CK
>
>
> --
> Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
> Ubuntu-devel-discuss at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-discuss/attachments/20080209/27c6e919/attachment.html>