[Fwd: Re: More Ubuntu Wallpapers]

[Greg]

 >Is Creative Commons an acceptable lisence? Or is it incompatible with 
the GPL because you have to give credit to the original >authour?

On 09/03/07, *Conrad Knauer * <atheoi at gmail.com 
<mailto:atheoi at gmail.com>> wrote:

    Just to add a note to this thread, I just realized that most (if not
    all) of the Wikipedia featured images would have acceptable licenses
    and there are specific categories for those that would make good
    background images:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikipedia_featured_pictures
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikipedia_featured_desktop_backgrounds
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikipedia_featured_widescreen_desktop_backgrounds
    <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikipedia_featured_widescreen_desktop_backgrounds>

    CK


Has anyone mentioned gnome-look.org? Lots of GPL desktop artwork 
there... and much of it is Ubuntu specific.

http://www.gnome-look.org/


-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: file:///tmp/nsmail-1.tmp
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-discuss/attachments/20070310/3f5b1f5b/attachment.ksh>