Disabled Intel SATA bug policy (Bug #117314)
Sitsofe Wheeler
sitsofe at yahoo.com
Sun Jun 3 10:43:32 UTC 2007
Hi,
The "SATA disk is in PATA mode with kernel 2.6.20-16-generic (piix
claiming SATA controller on ICH4/ICH5 Intel chipsets)" aka "the great
renaming"
(
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-source-2.6.20/+bug/117314
) has been around for a week and it appears that the patch that led to
this is going to be reversed. However it is unclear what the current
advice/policy surrounding this issue is.
Are people that relabeled their partitions with /dev/h??? syntax (rather
than UUIDs) going to get notice that things are going back the other
way? Are people whose systems were allegedly fixed going to be
forewarned that they may be broken again? Is there going to a note
indicating how a kernel option can be used to disable ata_piix? What
does it mean when an update is -security? Is the updated kernel
reversing this patch going to be in -security even though it won't be a
security fix? Will advanced warning of this update be passed through the
forums? What is the current advice to people to people who haven't
updated to 2.6.20-15 yet - wait until 2.6.20-17 is released?
What is the policy on the various spinoff/variant bugs like
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-source-2.6.20/+bug/116996
,
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-source-2.6.20/+bug/117447
and
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-source-2.6.20/+bug/117413
? Should piix problems just be closed once the updated kernel is out and
the problems are hidden by the use of the SATA driver?
Will the release notes (http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/releasenotes/704
) be updated to warn about this kernel? Is it possible to have a second
more technical release notes/errata page in the style of
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/f7/en_US/ (the F7 page talks
about how partitions must be labeled)?
What systems were affected by this? I fear that there may be some
additional subset of ICH3, ICH6 and ICH7 owners also affected - is this
right?
I'm reposting here because I'm out of ideas about where else to raise
this (I've tried IRC a few times since Martin's comment but I think I've
been around at the wrong time). If this is the wrong list I apologise -
please point me in the right direction.
--
Sitsofe | http://sucs.org/~sits/
More information about the Ubuntu-devel-discuss
mailing list