regular fsck runs are too disturbing
eapache at gmail.com
Tue Dec 4 22:22:33 GMT 2007
Autofsck does look like the way to go. Especially nice would be the option
to run a manual fsck, although that might already be an option ('a test can
be run' or is that something else?). I'm definitely in favour of this.
On Dec 4, 2007 11:50 AM, Dane Mutters <dmutters at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 08:03 -0700, Neal McBurnett wrote:
> > You're right - a deeper analysis is needed. And this issue has at
> > least one official blueprint:
> > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/AutoFsckspec
> > You can try AutoFsck:
> > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/AutoFsck
> Autofsck looks like it would do the trick, IMHO. It would eliminate the
> nastiness of a 10+ minute boot time, and still go a long way to protect
> against filesystem corruption.
> Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
> Ubuntu-devel-discuss at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Ubuntu-devel-discuss