regular fsck runs are too disturbing

(=?utf-8?q?=60=60-=5F-=C2=B4=C2=B4?=) -- Fernando ubuntu at
Sun Dec 2 22:55:50 UTC 2007

On Monday 22 October 2007 01:51:03 Dane Mutters wrote:
> I think that there is an occasional need to check the file system for
> errors, but I think that it might work better as an optional, but
> "highly recommended" thing.
> Here's another case in point:
> I have been working to set up an Ubuntu-based Asterisk phone server at
> my workplace.  For this application, having to wait even 1 minute for
> the system to reboot (if necessary) is barely tolerable, but if it ever
> has to be restarted for any reason, and then insists on spending the
> next 5 minutes doing a fsck, thus rendering the business phone-less,
> that would surely make my employers very frustrated.
> I'm sure this has already been discussed, but I wish to add my opinion
> to that of others who believe that a better solution is needed.  Surely,
> fsck is a really good idea, but for certain uses of Ubuntu, it's really
> not practical.  I'm sure that something else can be devised.
> Keep up the good work.
> --Dane

Dane , you can manually bypass this by using tune2fs, and disable the fsck on your server.

BUGabundo  :o)
Linux user #443786    GPG key 1024D/A1784EBB
My new micro-blog @
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <>

More information about the Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list