<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#C0C0C0" text="#000000">
Hi,<br>
<br>
I can't answer to this specific question, but as an user with
Firefox as default browser on Ubuntu 15.04 Desktop, if those addons
are kept, perhaps they need to be signed.<br>
<br>
Today when I updated to the latest FF Nightly 42.0a1 on the daily
ppa, Mozilla activated the obligation to use only officially signed
extensions:<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://support.mozilla.org/fr/kb/add-on-signing-in-firefox">https://support.mozilla.org/fr/kb/add-on-signing-in-firefox</a><br>
<br>
All 3 Ubuntu addons were automatically desactivated.<br>
<br>
On the nightly version, there is an option in <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="About:config">About:config</a> to
restore the old behavior (xpinstall.signatures.required set to
false), but on future normal and beta versions of Firefox, it will
not be possible anymore normally.<br>
<br>
Even if the addons are provided directly in the packages and not on
Mozilla site, it is still also possible to validate them.<br>
<br>
Best regards,<br>
<br>
Xavier<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Le 10/08/2015 19:21, Bryan Quigley a
écrit :<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAAWf5=t5q0khOBX6mYjC4EBpbdKVBBCkEBG9UtWc71YQXk7vng@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">HI,
I'm wondering if we still need these three Firefox extensions. I
can't tell* what they do in Wily:
Ubuntu Online Accounts (xul-ext-webaccounts)
Unity Desktop Integration (xul-ext-unity)
Unity Websites integration (xul-ext-websites-integration)
With a Unity specific browser coming, is there a reason to maintain these?
Kind regards,
Bryan
Ubuntu Firefox Modifications (xul-ext-ubufox)
Does the defaults change, <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="apt://">apt://</a>, etc - still useful
* Online Accounts for Gmail doesn't set up anything specific for the
browser. My Firefox doesn't seem better integrated with them on.
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>