> The Unity API is minimal. <a href="https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Unity/LauncherAPI">https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Unity/LauncherAPI</a> I can't position, I can't edit, I can't remove and I can't add anything. You are comparing a very mature and years old product Firefox with a very recent app called Unity. I am not a Unity dev but I would personally prefer that they put more efforts in making Unity more stable and smooth than adding customization options and making the path towards breaking unity more easier. > You said you don't want customizeability (I mean, you make unity have unmodifiable defaults) and you said you want more apps (I mean, you put a huge effort in the Ubuntu Software Store), but these two things are a contradication, because *if we can't do anything, It isn't contradiction. Think about it, write an app which makes a beautiful UI for editing preferences already exposed by Unity. Put it in software center. Plus non customization doesn't mean it is contradiction to app development. If you are writing a word processor app or a media player app how does it matter that for that app to run Unity needs to be more customizable? > why should we develop apps for you*? What do you mean by we? It can be reworded as "why should *I* write apps for you". Plus I don't know where we are going with this *you* and *us* mentality. > Plus, Firefox writes tutorials that start from overview, allow to go in-depth, have examples and I think Ubuntu should do that too <a href="http://developer.ubuntu.com">developer.ubuntu.com</a> is aimed towards that - Manish