<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
On 02/09/11 20:00, Jeff Fortin wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:1314990007.24114.13.camel@kusanagi"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=ISO-8859-1">
<meta name="GENERATOR" content="GtkHTML/4.0.1">
<blockquote type="CITE"> <tt><font color="#2e3436">The pitivi
team just got a new version out with quite some nice changes</font></tt><tt><font
color="#2e3436"> </font></tt><tt><font color="#2e3436">in
it and said they would do the glade to gtkbuilder conversion
this</font></tt><tt><font color="#2e3436"> </font></tt><tt><font
color="#2e3436">cycle, that seems enough material to revisit
the decision later if the</font></tt><tt><font
color="#2e3436"> </font></tt><tt><font color="#2e3436">new
version is proving to be solid and the gtkbuilder switch get
done so</font></tt><tt><font color="#2e3436"> </font></tt><tt><font
color="#2e3436">what people think of keeping pitivi on by
default until before beta and</font></tt><tt><font
color="#2e3436"> </font></tt><tt><font color="#2e3436">discuss
what we do in a desktop team meeting then?</font></tt><br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Hi, we're about to release a new version (hopefully this week-end)
and I was wondering if you folks had any special requirements. The
last time we talked with people from Ubuntu we learned that you
are very careful about saving space on the install CD, so to make
pitivi fit we migrated from libglade to gtkbuilder, got rid of the
gconf dependency (maybe some other things too, I forget), and I
implemented a soft-dependency manager so most remainings deps are
optional.<br>
<br>
We haven't heard from the Ubuntu/Canonical folks at all since I
asked on this mailing list in May. I've been subscribed to this
mailing list and haven't seen further discussions on revisiting
the decision to include pitivi or not... and I couldn't get a hold
of you on IRC when I publicly asked the question a couple of
times. We're completely in the dark here. Can we have a status
update with any outstanding issues you may have?
<br>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Hi,<br>
<br>
Sebastien is on vacation this week and I'm not sure if he is
checking e-mails. I'm not in a position to give you an authoritative
answer on this, but PiTiVi was mentioned briefly in our desktop team
meeting last week - see
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2011/08/23/%23ubuntu-desktop.html#t15:54">http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2011/08/23/%23ubuntu-desktop.html#t15:54</a>.
The consensus seemed to be that we would revisit the decision at
UDS.<br>
<br>
Sorry I can't give you a more definitive answer.<br>
<br>
Regards<br>
Chris<br>
</body>
</html>