Firefox supported architectures

[Bryan Quigley]

Agreed.  Been looking at the build failures on arm to see if anything
stands out - looking to setup some pis to build it locally.  If anyone
else has a good ARM setup and looking for something to troubleshoot,
look at both the stable firefox and firefox beta/nightly as they
appear to fail with different errors.

Had a good discussion on IRC about it:
https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2017/07/17/%23ubuntu-desktop.html#t14:42

On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 6:42 PM, Marcos Alano <marcoshalano at gmail.com> wrote:
> I think armhf is important until release Ubuntu Desktop for arm64 to run on
> Raspberry Pi 3.
>
> My 2 cents.
>
>
> On 7/10/17 6:28 PM, Bryan Quigley wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> It's been discussed a few times on IRC how Firefox gets stuck in
>> -proposed in dev releases because it doesn't compile for all the archs
>> on every Firefox release.   This also occurs for those same archs on
>> updates -  for example the most up-to-date Firefox release for ppc64el
>> Xenial is 52.
>>
>> Can we drop Firefox building for some of the archs so that it's not
>> blocked on them? What archs do we really care about having Firefox on?
>>
>> Currently building:amd64, arm64, i386
>> Currently failing: armhf, ppc64el,  armhf
>>
>> Thoughts?
>> Bryan
>>
>> * Latest build fails related to rust on ppc64el.   Check out rmadison
>> firefox for more (I believe it is accurate)
>>
>