unity-firefox-extension does not comply with upstream add-on policy
a.starr.b at gmail.com
Fri Oct 11 15:44:54 UTC 2013
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 3:00 AM, Benjamin Kerensa <bkerensa at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> Hello Desktop Team,
> unity-firefox-extension does not comply with upstream add-on policy
> which does not permit automatic installation of an add-on into Firefox
> which the aforementioned Ubuntu package does.
> I have raised a request upstream to add unity-firefox-extension to
> Blocklisting, and part of that process is to reach out to the vendor
> or developer responsible for the add-on to ask them to fix the add-on
> to bring it into the scope of upstream guidelines.
Mozilla's wiki page on blocklisting a plugin , states that there
should be a high bar for adding plugins to the blocklist:
> Acceptable reasons for blocking software include:
> * Critical security vulnerabilities.
> * A history of security vulnerabilities.
> * High crash volume.
> * Malicious in nature.
> * Severe performance impact (e.g. adds more than 75% to start-up time).
> * Severe bugs that unintentionally affect core Firefox features.
I don't think that unity-firefox-extension meets those criteria, do you?
Is there an upstream bug tracking this issue?
-- Andrew Starr-Bochicchio
Ubuntu Developer <https://launchpad.net/~andrewsomething>
Debian Developer <http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=asb>
PGP/GPG Key ID: D53FDCB1
More information about the ubuntu-desktop