Review of featured applications
Robert Ancell
robert.ancell at canonical.com
Fri Mar 26 03:22:16 GMT 2010
On 26/03/10 14:05, Shane Fagan wrote:
>> - Remove Eclipse
>> - Huge download
>> - Only supports Java out of the box
>> - The Eclipse brand is strong enough that it doesn't need promoting
>>
> Im going to go out on the limb and suggest we replace it with
> Monodevelop it supports mono,java,python,vala....etc although require
> the user to install the support for each language.
>
My review of all the supplied IDEs showed MonoDevelop to appear to be
the easiest to use, but:
- I've never used an IDE for any significant period of time
- I didn't use any of the proposed IDEs to do more that write a hello
world program.
We need to consider what sort of user clicks on featured applications
and which users would benefit from the suggested IDE.
My experience of IDE users is:
- They're generally passionate users who have a preferred IDE (much
like text editors for non-IDE programmers). So by suggesting an IDE
we're targeting people who haven't already chosen an IDE.
- IDEs tend be a part of a developer package. If we suggest
MonoDevelop will users link well to documentation and the developer
community? Or will it just be a fancy text editor/compiler?
Saying it in a simpler way:
- Will an IDE encourage people to learn programming?
- Will opportunistic developers be able to use it to complete their
desired project?
- Will experienced developers find the suggested IDE helpful or will
they already use their existing IDE/do the research themselves?
More information about the ubuntu-desktop
mailing list