Trimming down gnome-applets (and removing HAL dependency)
Chris Coulson
chrisccoulson at ubuntu.com
Sun Aug 2 10:51:07 BST 2009
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 12:18 +0530, Bryan Quigley wrote:
> I agree on those two and have two more to add. (If these are already
> gone/changed in karmic, sorry)
> Neither for full removal but they just shouldn't be ran per user at
> startup:
> Jockey - purpose is notification of hardware changes.
> Update manager - purpose is notification of updates available
>
> Thoughts?
>
> On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 4:56 AM, Chris Coulson
> <chrisccoulson at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As you're all aware, the mixer-applet was recently disabled in
> Karmic.
> This got me thinking about whether we need all the other
> applets we
> currently have on the default install, and I wondered whether
> there were
> any others that could be disabled too.
>
> I just wanted to know what everyone else thought. The ones
> that are
> currently installed which I think could probably be disabled
> are:
>
> *** battstatus ***
>
> This currently is able to use either a HAL backend or the
> legacy /proc/acpi interface for obtaining battery information.
> This has
> previously been (and might still be) a source of bugs when the
> legacy
> interface presents inconsistent information compared to what
> gnome-power-manager says (eg, battstatus saying laptop is on
> AC where
> g-p-m says it is on battery). AFAIK, the legacy /proc/acpi
> interface has
> been deprecated for some time, and we don't really want the
> HAL backend
> either. I'm not sure what benefit this adds in addition to the
> gnome-power-manager status icon, but I think it is a good
> candidate for
> removal. It is also the only applet in gnome-applets which
> depends on
> HAL. Fedora don't ship this applet currently.
>
> *** modemlights ***
>
> This has a dependency on network-admin from gnome-system-tools
> which we
> don't even install by default anymore, so is crippled on the
> default
> install anyway. To be functional, users will need to manually
> download
> gnome-network-admin, so I'm not sure if we'd lose anything by
> removing
> this applet.
>
> Do people have any objections to removing these applets, or
> know if any
> users are still using them? Perhaps you can think of some
> other applets
> that could also be disabled? Is there any use-case I have
> missed which
> would prohibit the removal of these 2 applets?
>
> Regards
> Chris
>
>
>
> --
> ubuntu-desktop mailing list
> ubuntu-desktop at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop
>
Thank you for your input, but I started this really to talk specifically
about gnome-applets. If you want to talk about removing other session
agents, then you might be better off starting a new topic with a more
appropriate title. And I don't really agree that you could remove the 2
examples you gave from user sessions anyway.
Regards
Chris
More information about the ubuntu-desktop
mailing list