Proposal: include Brasero by default

[Matthew Paul Thomas]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Wouter Stomp wrote:
>...
> What is even more important is that ncb and brasero have a very, very
> similar user interface, but not exactly the same. This can be very
> confusing, as it feels like you are working with the same application
> but then e.g. suddenly the burn cd button has moved to a different
> location.
>...

Removing nautilus-cd-burner wouldn't fix the problem you describe:
unnecessary UI inconsistency would still exist with Brasero vs. Nautilus
itself. Why is creating a new folder done one way in Nautilus, and
another way in Brasero? Why is removing files from a folder done way in
Nautilus, and another way in Brasero? Why does the confirmation alert
for replacing an item with the same name have different text and buttons
in Brasero than it does in Nautilus? Why does Brasero refer to
non-existent "projects"? And so on.

All these differences people shouldn't have to learn. The ideal data CD
(and CD image) burning interface would be a strict superset of the
normal interface for the file manager. nautilus-cd-burner provides this
for many use cases, but it's missing basic features (like multi-session
burning) that Brasero provides.

So if you want to solve the duplication problem thoroughly, implement
the missing data CD features in nautilus-cd-burner (branching it if
necessary), and the missing audio CD features in Rhythmbox. :-)

Cheers
- --
Matthew Paul Thomas
http://mpt.net.nz/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHjLBM6PUxNfU6ecoRAisIAKCShQcf612OQIVizQEN5fESAzz7XwCgp4uq
ET99au+IQnMVJlfQ4kjUkxY=
=5wjf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----