<div dir="ltr"><div><div><div>Maybe the KC was unclear that was a request from the CC since you previously said<br></div>your communication was as an individual. Again the CC in my experience almost<br></div>always emails teams directly and setups up a time.... Usually I have seen<br></div>Lyz send out these invites on behalf of the CC.<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Michael Hall <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mhall119@ubuntu.com" target="_blank">mhall119@ubuntu.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On 05/30/2015 12:29 PM, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:<br>
> Maybe the CC should make a request to meet? AFAIK the CC other than its<br>
> "request" for Jonathan<br>
> to step down has not actually formally asked the KC to meet with the CC.<br>
><br>
<br>
</span>From the emails that ScottK posted on his blog, you will find at least<br>
the following.<br>
<br>
cproffit:<br>
<span class="">"We have a few members who are not on-line currently and have not read<br>
the email so I can not speak for them, but do you feel that a meeting<br>
with the Kubuntu Council and the Community Council would be a good step<br>
forward in this matter?"<br>
<br>
</span>cproffit:<br>
"I think the point in the discussion would be to better understand why<br>
the CC came to this conclusion that they had to make this request. It<br>
may not change minds on either side, but we should have the discussion."<br>
<br>
me:<br>
"Let’s get together on IRC, Google Hangout, or any other medium that<br>
works for you so that we can work through this together."<br>
<br>
me:<br>
"If you feel there is a reason for the CC to once again trust Jonathan’s<br>
intentions, then by all means let’s talk about it.The CC and the KC are<br>
not adversaries, we are partners. We are eager to have this discussion<br>
with you."<br>
<br>
me:<br>
"So I invite any members of the Kubuntu Council who<br>
want to talk to pick a time and a place for us to talk."<br>
<br>
me:<br>
"If anybody wants to talk to me, or yell at me, or tell me what a stupid<br>
thing we’ve done and how big of a jerk I am, I am mhall119 on Freenode<br>
and my email address is below...At this point I don’t care what is said<br>
so long as we finally start talking."<br>
<span class=""><br>
<br>
> Isn't that the usual process that the CC emails teams it want to meet<br>
> with and makes a<br>
> request? Having been on one of the teams the CC meets with I recall it<br>
> working that way.<br>
><br>
> On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 9:14 AM, Michael Hall <<a href="mailto:mhall119@ubuntu.com">mhall119@ubuntu.com</a><br>
</span><span class="">> <mailto:<a href="mailto:mhall119@ubuntu.com">mhall119@ubuntu.com</a>>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> In that case I hope that any member of the KC who doesn't adhere to that<br>
> condition will contact any of us on the CC so we can start that dialog.<br>
><br>
><br>
> Michael Hall<br>
</span>> <a href="mailto:mhall119@ubuntu.com">mhall119@ubuntu.com</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:mhall119@ubuntu.com">mhall119@ubuntu.com</a>><br>
<span class="">><br>
> On 05/29/2015 11:48 AM, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:<br>
> > <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallacy_of_quoting_out_of_context" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallacy_of_quoting_out_of_context</a><br>
> ><br>
> > On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 8:43 AM, Benjamin Kerensa <<a href="mailto:bkerensa@ubuntu.com">bkerensa@ubuntu.com</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:bkerensa@ubuntu.com">bkerensa@ubuntu.com</a>><br>
</span><span class="">> > <mailto:<a href="mailto:bkerensa@ubuntu.com">bkerensa@ubuntu.com</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:bkerensa@ubuntu.com">bkerensa@ubuntu.com</a>>>> wrote:<br>
> ><br>
> > "However, the Kubuntu Council put a condition of the Community<br>
> > Council’s request to Jonathan be removed before they would agree to<br>
> > a meeting.[3, 4, 5]"<br>
> ><br>
> > Incorrect. Those were all individuals who made it clear they were<br>
> > speaking as individuals just like the individuals of the CC made<br>
> > clear their early emails were not representative of the CC as a whole.<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 6:59 AM, Charles Profitt<br>
> > <<a href="mailto:ubuntu@cprofitt.com">ubuntu@cprofitt.com</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:ubuntu@cprofitt.com">ubuntu@cprofitt.com</a>><br>
</span><div><div class="h5">> <mailto:<a href="mailto:ubuntu@cprofitt.com">ubuntu@cprofitt.com</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:ubuntu@cprofitt.com">ubuntu@cprofitt.com</a>>>> wrote:<br>
> ><br>
> > __<br>
> ><br>
> > The Community Council is currently working on a communication to<br>
> > the Kubuntu Council with regard to their request for additional<br>
> > information. The Community Council will be providing a much more<br>
> > detailed list of incidents, with context, to the Kubuntu<br>
> > Council. The Community Council wishes to respect the privacy of<br>
> > those involved so those details will not be made public by us.<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > The details below are meant to give the larger Ubuntu Community<br>
> > more information on the issue.<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > The Ubuntu Community Council (CC) believes in making the Ubuntu<br>
> > community a wonderful place to participate. We strongly support<br>
> > people treating one another with respect regardless of their<br>
> > differences of opinion.<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > It is important that it is understood that we will not be<br>
> > reversing that decision.<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > Framework:<br>
> ><br>
> > We would like to better explain the framework the Community<br>
> > Council used to make this difficult decision.<br>
> ><br>
> > *<br>
> ><br>
> > Be Respectful<br>
> ><br>
> > o<br>
> ><br>
> > Disagreement is no excuse for poor manners.<br>
> ><br>
> > o<br>
> ><br>
> > Assume good intentions.<br>
> ><br>
> > *<br>
> ><br>
> > Value decisiveness, clarity and consensus<br>
> ><br>
> > o<br>
> ><br>
> > Disagreements, social and technical, are normal,<br>
> but we<br>
> > do not allow them to persist and fester.<br>
> ><br>
> > *<br>
> ><br>
> > We value discussion, data and decisiveness<br>
> ><br>
> > o<br>
> ><br>
> > Ultimately, if a decision has been taken by the people<br>
> > responsible for it, and is supported by the project<br>
> > governance, it will stand.<br>
> ><br>
> > *<br>
> ><br>
> > Take responsibility for our words and our actions<br>
> ><br>
> > o<br>
> ><br>
> > If someone has been harmed or offended, we listen<br>
> > carefully and respectfully, and work to right the<br>
> wrong.<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > Communications with Jonathan Riddell:<br>
> ><br>
> > Starting in December of 2013 Jonathan Riddell started a series<br>
> > of communications with the Community Council with regards<br>
> to IP<br>
> > policy and the community funding program.<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > The Community Council in good faith believing that<br>
> Jonathan was<br>
> > acting with good intentions took action items to work with<br>
> > Canonical to resolve the issues raised.<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > Over the course of the next two and a half years Jonathan<br>
> became<br>
> > increasingly confrontational in his interactions with the<br>
> > Community Council over these two items. At times his wording<br>
> > caused offense and were potentially harmful to the<br>
> community due<br>
> > to his making worst case assumptions. [1] One of the best<br>
> > examples of this behavior is the March 19th Community Council<br>
> > meetings. Jonathan was demanding that the Community<br>
> Council make<br>
> > a statement that agreed with his position and was unwilling to<br>
> > accept the decision that the Community Council made with<br>
> regard<br>
> > to waiting until Canonical had finished a review of the IP<br>
> > policy. In that same meeting Jonathan was insensitive to the<br>
> > requests that he be more respectful and that he was making the<br>
> > situation more difficult.[2]<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > To be clear, it is not the individual communications nor<br>
> > questions that were the issue. The questions are valid and<br>
> > important. It was the increasingly hostile tone of the<br>
> > communications coupled with untenable demands and<br>
> assumptions of<br>
> > the worst possible behavior on the part of Canonical and the<br>
> > Community Council. Jonathan appeared unwilling to take a step<br>
> > back and evaluate how he was communicating with the Community<br>
> > Council nor was he willing to contemplate anything less<br>
> than the<br>
> > worst possible motivation on the part of Canonical.<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > Based on the pattern of communications the Community Council<br>
> > decided to ask Jonathan to step back from leadership for a<br>
> > period of one year. We were careful to delineate that he would<br>
> > keep his membership and development rights so that he could<br>
> > continue his excellent work on Kubuntu. The purpose was to<br>
> have<br>
> > Jonathan take a break from leadership so that he could reflect<br>
> > and we could work on rebuilding a collaborative relationship<br>
> > with the KDE Community in Ubuntu.<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > Private vs Public<br>
> ><br>
> > The Ubuntu Community Council values transparency, but we also<br>
> > value personal privacy and public reputations. We also<br>
> feel that<br>
> > some relationships can best be repaired in private. Once we<br>
> > made the decision with regards to Jonathan we sent an email to<br>
> > him and the Kubuntu Council. Their first response requested an<br>
> > explanation which we were willing to give and wanted to do<br>
> so in<br>
> > a meeting with them. However, the Kubuntu Council put a<br>
> > condition of the Community Council’s request to Jonathan be<br>
> > removed before they would agree to a meeting.[3, 4, 5]<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > Moving Forward:<br>
> ><br>
> > The examples we are citing here are not a full list, but serve<br>
> > to explain our decision.<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > If at any point in the last two and a half years Jonathan had<br>
> > paused and considered the assertions that he was being<br>
> > aggressive and making things more difficult, this situation<br>
> > could have been avoided. In the end we felt that Jonathan had<br>
> > become unreasonable and was making worst-case assumptions<br>
> about<br>
> > the motivations of anyone who did not agree with his<br>
> positions.<br>
> > For that reason we have determined that he cannot represent<br>
> > Ubuntu or parts of its community. We hope that, given a year,<br>
> > Jonathan will return as a more constructive force in the<br>
> community.<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > Looking back, there has been a constant willingness on<br>
> > Jonathan’s behalf to portray Kubuntu as somehow at odds with<br>
> > Canonical or the rest of Ubuntu. The portrayal of the<br>
> project as<br>
> > a ‘blue-headed stepchild’, for example, is in and of itself a<br>
> > divisive position. We very much want KDE to feel welcome and<br>
> > included and there are many other teams that are most happy to<br>
> > collaborate to enable the best possible expression of what the<br>
> > code has to offer our shared users. We are open and wish to<br>
> > encourage people passionate about both KDE and Ubuntu to lead<br>
> > that work.<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > Now is time to discuss how the Ubuntu Community moves forward<br>
> > with Kubuntu as part of that community. We hope that the<br>
> Kubuntu<br>
> > Council will reach out to us in the near future and discuss a<br>
> > path forward as we continue to work together in the spirit<br>
> of “I<br>
> > am what I am because of who we all are.”<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > -----<br>
> ><br>
> > [1] On the 23rd of February 2015Jonathan made the following<br>
> > statement:<br>
> > “If the funding from October 2012 really isn't included in the<br>
> > current community fund and it simply has been stolen by<br>
> > Canonical this is worse than I had thought.”<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > [2]On March 19th of 2015 Jonathan made the following<br>
> statements:<br>
> ><br>
> > *<br>
> ><br>
> > “czajkowski: best stop giving in to their stalling and<br>
> just<br>
> > make a statement”<br>
> ><br>
> > *<br>
> ><br>
> > “mhall119: make a public statement saying it is untrue and<br>
> > irrelevent”<br>
> ><br>
> > *<br>
> ><br>
> > “pleia2: so make a public statement that it is untrue”<br>
> ><br>
> > *<br>
> ><br>
> > “czajkowski: so time to give up on the canonical legal<br>
> dept,<br>
> > they have been stalling for a year, enough already”<br>
> ><br>
> > *<br>
> ><br>
> > “I'm astonished that the CC doesn't understand the<br>
> basics of<br>
> > free software or how it can be harmed by claims that our<br>
> > software is not Free”<br>
> ><br>
> > On March 19th of 2015 the following statements were made to<br>
> > Jonathan which he ignored or derided:<br>
> ><br>
> > *<br>
> ><br>
> > “Riddell: you're really making this harder than needs be,<br>
> > you'd swear the CC sit around doing nothing”<br>
> ><br>
> > *<br>
> ><br>
> > “Riddell: In order to make a public statement on a legal<br>
> > matter the CC would have to have a legal expert familiar<br>
> > with international law and the laws of several<br>
> countries. I<br>
> > do not feel qualified to make any such public statement. I<br>
> > also would like to say that public thrashing about on the<br>
> > topic does not help the situation either.”<br>
> ><br>
> > *<br>
> ><br>
> > “Riddell: I do not see it as an excuse Riddell, but I<br>
> would<br>
> > like to ask you to be more respectful of the people trying<br>
> > to sort through the issue.”<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > [3] Charles PThu May 21 12:43:41 UTC 2015<br>
> ><br>
> > “I wanted to send you a quick email to let you know the CC has<br>
> > received your email and the one directly from Jonathan. We have<br>
> > a few members who are not on-line currently and have not read<br>
> > the email so I can not speak for them, but do you feel that a<br>
> > meeting with the Kubuntu Council and the Community Council would<br>
> > be a good step forward in this matter?”<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > [4] Myriam SThu May 21 21:30:12 UTC 2015<br>
> ><br>
> > “ I am sure a meeting would be useful to clarify the situation,<br>
> > but personally I am not happy with the threat issued to<br>
> > Jonathan, I think this would need to be resolved before we meet.”<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > [5]Scott KThu May 21 23:39:36 UTC 2015<br>
> ><br>
> > “If the CC wants to have a discussion about a non-catastrophic<br>
> > path forward, I think that would be wonderful, but I for one<br>
> > will not be involved in such discussions what Jonathon is under<br>
> > immediate threat.”<br>
> ><br>
> > --<br>
> > Ubuntu-community-team mailing list<br>
> > <a href="mailto:Ubuntu-community-team@lists.ubuntu.com">Ubuntu-community-team@lists.ubuntu.com</a><br>
> <mailto:<a href="mailto:Ubuntu-community-team@lists.ubuntu.com">Ubuntu-community-team@lists.ubuntu.com</a>><br>
</div></div>> > <mailto:<a href="mailto:Ubuntu-community-team@lists.ubuntu.com">Ubuntu-community-team@lists.ubuntu.com</a><br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">> <mailto:<a href="mailto:Ubuntu-community-team@lists.ubuntu.com">Ubuntu-community-team@lists.ubuntu.com</a>>><br>
> > Modify settings or unsubscribe at:<br>
> > <a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-community-team" target="_blank">https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-community-team</a><br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > --<br>
> > /*Benjamin Kerensa*/<br>
> > /<a href="http://benjaminkerensa.com/" target="_blank">http://benjaminkerensa.com/</a><br>
> > /"I am what I am because of who we all are" - Ubuntu/<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > --<br>
> > /*Benjamin Kerensa*/<br>
> > /<a href="http://benjaminkerensa.com/" target="_blank">http://benjaminkerensa.com/</a><br>
> > /"I am what I am because of who we all are" - Ubuntu/<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
><br>
> --<br>
> Ubuntu-community-team mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Ubuntu-community-team@lists.ubuntu.com">Ubuntu-community-team@lists.ubuntu.com</a><br>
> <mailto:<a href="mailto:Ubuntu-community-team@lists.ubuntu.com">Ubuntu-community-team@lists.ubuntu.com</a>><br>
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:<br>
> <a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-community-team" target="_blank">https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-community-team</a><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> --<br>
> /*Benjamin Kerensa*/<br>
> /<a href="http://benjaminkerensa.com/" target="_blank">http://benjaminkerensa.com/</a><br>
> /"I am what I am because of who we all are" - Ubuntu/<br>
<br>
<br>
</div></div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">Michael Hall<br>
<a href="mailto:mhall119@ubuntu.com">mhall119@ubuntu.com</a><br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature"><font color="#333333" face="comic sans ms, sans-serif"><i><b>Benjamin Kerensa</b></i></font><div><font color="#333333" face="comic sans ms, sans-serif"><i><a href="http://benjaminkerensa.com" target="_blank">http://benjaminkerensa.com</a></i></font></div><div><font color="#333333" face="comic sans ms, sans-serif"><i>"I am what I am because of who we all are" - Ubuntu</i></font></div></div>
</div>