I exchanged email with Amanda Brock last year who was General Counsel for Canonical Ltd and oversaw all of those teams. So yes they have been contacted. Jonathan as he pointed out has dialogues on this issue in the past too. <div class="gmail_quote">On May 3, 2015 8:46 PM, "José Antonio Rey" <<a href="mailto:jose@ubuntu.com">jose@ubuntu.com</a>> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">There's been suggestions to contact Canonical, and specifically the trademark and legal teams. Since the start of the discussion, has anyone tried to reach them? Can anyone try? Otherwise, we have this list in vain, since the suggestions given are not being taken. On 05/03/2015 10:44 PM, Benjamin Kerensa wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> Right and Jonathan said Canonical has been contacted a few times and the CC said they also looked into this once. So at this point would it not be appropriate and very reasonable for the CC to have a new dialogue and try to resolve this issue? The CC having a few Canonical employees on it and sabdfl could probably get the issue resolved much more easily than Jonathan who has clearly faced some difficulty. On May 3, 2015 8:40 PM, "cprofitt" <<a href="mailto:cprofitt@ubuntu.com" target="_blank">cprofitt@ubuntu.com</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:cprofitt@ubuntu.com" target="_blank">cprofitt@ubuntu.com</a>>> wrote: > > On Sun, 2015-05-03 at 17:27 -0700, Benjamin Kerensa wrote: > > Simple thing is a community flavor has asked the CC to intervene in > > this and the CC should do that. If the CC cannot what makes you think > > Jonathan would have anymore success? > > > My recollection is not that he asked use to intervene, but asked the CC > to make a statement with regards to intellectual property rights. > > Charles > > > > > > </blockquote> -- José Antonio Rey </blockquote></div>