Question
Che
cheguebeara at gmail.com
Mon Aug 6 01:50:03 UTC 2012
Actually I was going to add that you can't go wrong with installing 32
bit across the board.
I have a mix of older 32's and 64's on my desk here (3 laptops / 2 PC's)
all running Precise 32 bit.
It saves having to keep around extra install disks and makes 'grab and
go' much easier when working on a clients machine (I am on a mission to
convert every senior in town to Ubuntu - nothing says 'Grey Power' like
a 75 year old gramma showing a teenager how to do a 'sudo apt-get
update' or how to install a new ppa... lol)
Mark
('Che' works as well just haven't been addressed that way for years...
lol)
On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 00:49 +0000, james2432 at gmail.com wrote:
> Please see the uname -a instructions I've sent you in previous comments.
>
> Che just because he has 64bit capabilities doesn't necessarily mean he installed it, he might have installed 32bit
> Sent on the TELUS Mobility network with BlackBerry
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "David M. Pelly" <david.pelly at hotmail.ca>
> Sender: ubuntu-ca-bounces at lists.ubuntu.com
> Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2012 20:42:01
> To: Ubuntu Canada list<ubuntu-ca at lists.ubuntu.com>
> Reply-To: The Canadian Ubuntu Users Community <ubuntu-ca at lists.ubuntu.com>
> Subject: RE: Question
>
> --
> ubuntu-ca mailing list
> ubuntu-ca at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-ca
>
More information about the ubuntu-ca
mailing list