Ubuntu 10.04

Matthew Delaney matthew.l.delaney at gmail.com
Fri Sep 24 14:49:03 UTC 2010


Jose,

The best way to get things working better is to file a bug report; in the
mean time, if there is some specific problem you having let us know. There
are a lot of knowledgeable people who would probably be happy to help you
out if they can. I know first hand that hardware/driver issues can be
annoying and time consuming to fix, so let us know and someone may be able
to help.

cheers
    `Matt



On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 8:35 AM, J <jtc at totaltravelmarketing.com> wrote:

> On 9/24/2010 9:46 AM, Darcy Casselman wrote:
> > Hi Jose,
> >
> > If there's something you need help with, let us know.  Please report
> > specific bugs on Launchpad so we can make Ubuntu better.
> >
> > If it's your preference, or you're having more success with SuSE,
> > Fedora or Centos, I'd recommend sticking with those.
> >
> > Darcy.
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 9:08 AM, Jose<jtc at totaltravelmarketing.com>
>  wrote:
> >> hi,
> >>
> >> Not wanting to offend the hardcore guys, how is that one every single
> >> occasion I have installed ubuntu on any edition, after the initial
> >> install, I get the bunch of updates and then something stops working
> >>
> >> Just installed 10.04 on three decent desktops (as per older hardware),
> >> 512 RAM, intel chip video, integrated network on board, Celeron
> >> machines, first install, no problem has described above, once I get the
> >> updates, something craps out, gnome no longer displays correctly or
> >> network just stops working or grubs doesn't even show up when booting up
> >> or apt-get can retrieve any data or the machine is uncapable of a proper
> >> shutdown because of getting stuck on the network manager during the
> >> shutdown sequence, these are the things that come form the top of my
> >> head right now
> >>
> >> On the other hand, I've installed Suse or Fedora or Centos, same
> >> hardware, same scenario, no problem whatsoever, the motto of "just
> >> works" has never applied to my case at least when using ubuntu
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> ubuntu-ca mailing list
> >> ubuntu-ca at lists.ubuntu.com
> >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-ca
> >>
> >
> Well, its more about the thing that every single place has this thing
> for Ubuntu, where is glorified to the point where is upsetting to see
> that "just it works", when it doesn't, not misunderstand me, I like
> Ubuntu, but this software may "just work" on newer hardware rather  than
> older, but of course Canonical wont tell you that
>
>
> --
> ubuntu-ca mailing list
> ubuntu-ca at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-ca
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-ca/attachments/20100924/ac6cac64/attachment.html>


More information about the ubuntu-ca mailing list