Printer
Darryl Moore
darryl at moores.ca
Wed Dec 16 14:46:58 UTC 2009
Sadly Kodak is garbage too. It's too bad because they have reasonably
priced printers with really cheap ink. I would buy one if only they
worked with Linux.
Tony Yarusso wrote:
> HP has a great reputation with Linux support. It never hurts to check
> compatibility lists like
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/HardwareSupportComponentsPrinters,
> http://www.fsf.org/resources/hw/printers, and
> http://linuxprinting.org/ of course. Generally speaking though, the
> general consensus seems to be HP, Epson, and Brother are solid, Canon
> sometimes makes a good appearance, and Lexmark is garbage.
>
> - Tony Yarusso
>
More information about the ubuntu-ca
mailing list