Printer

Darryl Moore darryl at moores.ca
Wed Dec 16 14:46:58 UTC 2009


Sadly Kodak is garbage too. It's too bad because they have reasonably
priced printers with really cheap ink. I would buy one if only they
worked with Linux.

Tony Yarusso wrote:
> HP has a great reputation with Linux support.  It never hurts to check
> compatibility lists like
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/HardwareSupportComponentsPrinters,
> http://www.fsf.org/resources/hw/printers, and
> http://linuxprinting.org/ of course.  Generally speaking though, the
> general consensus seems to be HP, Epson, and Brother are solid, Canon
> sometimes makes a good appearance, and Lexmark is garbage.
> 
>  - Tony Yarusso
> 




More information about the ubuntu-ca mailing list