Ubuntu vs Kubuntu
andy.hunter at rogers.com
Mon Jan 22 16:01:34 UTC 2007
On Monday 22 January 2007 07:55, Maurice Murphy wrote:
> Andrew Hunter wrote:
> > On Sunday 21 January 2007 11:28, Maurice Murphy wrote:
> >> Peter,
> >> Thanks for your well reasoned critique. For me, however, I believe we
> >> should leave KDE to others.
> > As a happy Kubuntu user, I disagree.
> >> Xandros and others do a good job with
> >> this. Why add to the confusion when the Gnome is a cleaner, more
> >> effective layout?
> > That is _entirely_ subjective.
> >> As an ex-XP MCE user, I had no difficulty with the
> >> transition to Ubuntu. It was a pleasure.
> > Great.
> >> Why not stick with Ubuntu and
> >> make it even better than it is? IMHO this would be a more efficient use
> >> of resources.
> > I think you miss the point. Kubuntu was started as a community derivitive
> > to use KDE and Ubuntu repositories. In no way does Kubuntu "steal"
> > resources from Ubuntu, therefore all this would do is dis-enfranchise a
> > portion of Ubuntu users (yes, even though I use Kubuntu I consider myself
> > an Ubuntu user). IMHO, a move like this would be against the principles
> > of FOSS.
> > Note that there is nothing Canonical can do to stop someone from creating
> > a derivitive distribution, they can only control the Ubuntu trademark. In
> > contrary to this, Canonical actively encourages people to use the
> > software they provide in any manner they see fit, that is freedom.
> >> Maurice
> My apologies to all Kubuntu users! I stand corrected! I guess my
> subjective views were born out of my happiness with the Ubuntu Gnome
> interface and overall performance. Please forgive!
That is the beauty of FOSS, you have choise. I encourage you to try out
Kubuntu some time, like when KDE4 is released. At the very worst, you love of
Gnome will be confirmed.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the ubuntu-ca