<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">El 22/03/13 05:52, Alberto Salvia
Novella escribió:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:514BE394.5040708@gmail.com" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<big><font face="Ubuntu Condensed"> <small><font
face="sans-serif">Here is my application:</font></small></font></big><br>
<br>
<big><font face="Ubuntu">1. Do you promise to be polite to bug
reporters even if they are rude to you or Ubuntu? Have you
signed the Ubuntu Code of Conduct?</font></big>
<ol type="1">
</ol>
<blockquote>Yes, I promise: I signed Ubuntu Code of Conduct years
ago, and read it recently.<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<ol type="1">
</ol>
<big><font face="Ubuntu">2. Have you read <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/HowToTriage">Bugs/HowToTriage</a>,
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Assignment">Bugs/Assignment</a>,
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Status">Bugs/Status</a>
and <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Importance">Bugs/Importance</a>?
Do you have any questions about that documentation?</font></big>
<ol type="1">
</ol>
<blockquote>I have been an active member of Launchpad since 2007
and, since then, the only operating system I have used in my
computers has been Ubuntu. In this period I read these
wiki-pages many times, and from start to end before writing this
application.<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<ol type="1">
</ol>
<big><font face="Ubuntu">3. What sensitive data should you look
for in a private Apport crash report bug before making it
public? See <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/HowToTriage">Bugs/HowToTriage</a>
for more information. </font></big>
<ol type="1">
</ol>
<blockquote>
<ul>
</ul>
- I should look for "<span class="backtick">CoreDump.gz" and
remove it i</span>f the stack trace provides enough details.<small><br>
<br>
</small>- I should check into <span class="backtick">"Stacktrace.txt"
and </span><span class="backtick">"ThreadStacktrace.txt" for
any sensitive information like passwords, </span>bank account
numbers, CSS keys, user names or server names.<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<ol type="1">
</ol>
<big><font face="Ubuntu">4. Is there a particular package or group
of packages that you are interested in helping out with?</font></big><br>
<ol type="1">
</ol>
<blockquote>There isn't. My objective is Ubuntu to be perceived
stable as a hole, by working on bugs that are more obvious and
making them to be triaged as fast as possible.<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<big><font face="Ubuntu">5. Please list five or more bug reports
which you have triaged and include an explanation of your
decisions. Please note that these bugs should be
representative of your very best work and they should
demonstrate your understanding of the triage process and how
to properly handle bugs. For <strong>all</strong> the bugs in
the list, please indicate what importance you would give it <strong>and</strong>
explain the reasoning. </font></big><em><big><font
face="Ubuntu">Please use urls in your list of bugs.</font></big></em><br>
<blockquote><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntuone-storage-protocol/+bug/720707">Bandwidth
limit is not correctly enforced: Transmission delays are
inserted between data chunk writes (of arbitrary sizes)</a> <br>
- I change the hole bug description to be as clear as possible.
Also the original one didn't have proper steps to reproduce it.<br>
- I deeply investigated the origin of the bug and how to
workaround it. I provided the tools to test it by the users
themselves.<br>
- I would give it an importance of "high", since it has a
moderate impact on a large portion of Ubuntu users.<br>
<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-website-content/+bug/585940">Misinformation
when intending to download the 64-bit edition</a><br>
- I completely rewrote the hole bug, since it didn't reflect the
scope of the hole long discussion hold.<br>
- I would give it an importance of "low", since it's usability
issue that does not limit the functionality of Ubuntu but rather
creates a probable non-ideal configurations scenario.<br>
<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1072705">Unable
to upgrade "commercial/binary-i386/Packages"</a> <br>
- I change the hole bug description to be as clear as possible.<br>
- I asked the user to add the missing log files as separate
attachments, in order to have them automatically available. Also
marked the bug as incomplete.<br>
- Also asked to gather information using apport, since it was
missed.<br>
- I would give it an importance of "low", since the program
itself suggest the origin of the problem is a misconfiguration.<br>
<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1100189">upgrade
issues 12.04=>12.10</a><br>
- I transformed this but to a question, since the user made a
cross-dependency issue himself by using an experimental ppa for
xorg. So it wasn't a bug but a support request.<br>
- Since it is not longer a bug, its importance cannot be set.
However is would give it an importance of "low", since it's
hoped the user to be the only one affected.<br>
<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-disk-utility/+bug/1079196">When
selected partition is not focused, it becomes invisible</a><br>
- I attached an screen-cast which clearly showed the problem,
but now I think screen-casts are useless when the bug
description is clear.<br>
- I would give it an importance of "low", since it's an
usability issue that does not limit the functionality of the
application.<br>
- I assigned the bug to the "Paper Cuts Ninja" project, since of
its low importance in a application provided in the default
installation.<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
Or have a look at any other bug from the bunch I have <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://bugs.launchpad.net/%7Ees20490446e">here</a>,
although they aren't the most impressive in the world. But happy
birthday to me: I recently got my twenty-fives and also got at the
same time my hundred bugs worked in. And if you notice any errata
in this application there will be no problem in asking me to
improve it.<br>
<br>
Regards,<small><small><br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://launchpad.net/%7Ees20490446e">Alberto Salvia
Novella (es20490446e)</a></small></small><br>
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">El 08/01/13 15:10, C de-Avillez
escribió:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:2061598.D0So4SbAHO@xango3" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Tuesday, January 08, 2013 00:36:30 Alberto Salvia Novella wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Please, accept me to join Ubuntu BugSquad and BugControl in Launchpad
and I will show you what Raring is going to be. If you need more info
about me and how familiar I am with the triaging process, you can have a
look at my profile in Launchpad <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="https://launchpad.net/%7Ees20490446e"><https://launchpad.net/%7Ees20490446e></a>.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">My fault there regarding the Ubuntu-BugSquad. I have added you in (and
processed all other pending requests).
For Ubuntu BugControl the process is different. You must show you understand
how we use status and importance, and you must show bugs you triaged. This
process is explained in [1].
Cheers,
..C..
[1] <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugControl">https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugControl</a></pre>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</blockquote>
So?<br>
</body>
</html>