<html> <head> <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type"> </head> <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"> <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 08/04/2013 18:20, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote: </div> <blockquote cite="mid:5162EE4B.2000106@gmail.com" type="cite"> <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type"> <div class="moz-cite-prefix">El 22/03/13 05:52, Alberto Salvia Novella escribió: </div> <blockquote cite="mid:514BE394.5040708@gmail.com" type="cite"> <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type"> <big> Here is my application:</big> <big>1. Do you promise to be polite to bug reporters even if they are rude to you or Ubuntu? Have you signed the Ubuntu Code of Conduct?</big> <ol type="1"> </ol> <blockquote>Yes, I promise: I signed Ubuntu Code of Conduct years ago, and read it recently. </blockquote> <ol type="1"> </ol> <big>2. Have you read <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/HowToTriage">Bugs/HowToTriage</a>, <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Assignment">Bugs/Assignment</a>, <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Status">Bugs/Status</a> and <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Importance">Bugs/Importance</a>? Do you have any questions about that documentation?</big> <ol type="1"> </ol> <blockquote>I have been an active member of Launchpad since 2007 and, since then, the only operating system I have used in my computers has been Ubuntu. In this period I read these wiki-pages many times, and from start to end before writing this application. </blockquote> <ol type="1"> </ol> <big>3. What sensitive data should you look for in a private Apport crash report bug before making it public? See <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/HowToTriage">Bugs/HowToTriage</a> for more information. </big> <ol type="1"> </ol> <blockquote> <ul> </ul> - I should look for "CoreDump.gz" and remove it if the stack trace provides enough details. - I should check into "Stacktrace.txt" and "ThreadStacktrace.txt" for any sensitive information like passwords, bank account numbers, CSS keys, user names or server names. </blockquote> <ol type="1"> </ol> <big>4. Is there a particular package or group of packages that you are interested in helping out with?</big> <ol type="1"> </ol> <blockquote>There isn't. My objective is Ubuntu to be perceived stable as a hole, by working on bugs that are more obvious and making them to be triaged as fast as possible. </blockquote> <big>5. Please list five or more bug reports which you have triaged and include an explanation of your decisions. Please note that these bugs should be representative of your very best work and they should demonstrate your understanding of the triage process and how to properly handle bugs. For all the bugs in the list, please indicate what importance you would give it and explain the reasoning. </big><big>Please use urls in your list of bugs.</big> <blockquote><a moz-do-not-send="true" href="https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntuone-storage-protocol/+bug/720707">Bandwidth limit is not correctly enforced: Transmission delays are inserted between data chunk writes (of arbitrary sizes)</a> - I change the hole bug description to be as clear as possible. Also the original one didn't have proper steps to reproduce it. - I deeply investigated the origin of the bug and how to workaround it. I provided the tools to test it by the users themselves. - I would give it an importance of "high", since it has a moderate impact on a large portion of Ubuntu users. <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-website-content/+bug/585940">Misinformation when intending to download the 64-bit edition</a> - I completely rewrote the hole bug, since it didn't reflect the scope of the hole long discussion hold. - I would give it an importance of "low", since it's usability issue that does not limit the functionality of Ubuntu but rather creates a probable non-ideal configurations scenario. <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1072705">Unable to upgrade "commercial/binary-i386/Packages"</a> - I change the hole bug description to be as clear as possible. - I asked the user to add the missing log files as separate attachments, in order to have them automatically available. Also marked the bug as incomplete. - Also asked to gather information using apport, since it was missed. - I would give it an importance of "low", since the program itself suggest the origin of the problem is a misconfiguration. <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1100189">upgrade issues 12.04=>12.10</a> - I transformed this but to a question, since the user made a cross-dependency issue himself by using an experimental ppa for xorg. So it wasn't a bug but a support request. - Since it is not longer a bug, its importance cannot be set. However is would give it an importance of "low", since it's hoped the user to be the only one affected. <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-disk-utility/+bug/1079196">When selected partition is not focused, it becomes invisible</a> - I attached an screen-cast which clearly showed the problem, but now I think screen-casts are useless when the bug description is clear. - I would give it an importance of "low", since it's an usability issue that does not limit the functionality of the application. - I assigned the bug to the "Paper Cuts Ninja" project, since of its low importance in a application provided in the default installation. </blockquote> Or have a look at any other bug from the bunch I have <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="https://bugs.launchpad.net/%7Ees20490446e">here</a>, although they aren't the most impressive in the world. But happy birthday to me: I recently got my twenty-fives and also got at the same time my hundred bugs worked in. And if you notice any errata in this application there will be no problem in asking me to improve it. Regards, <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="https://launchpad.net/%7Ees20490446e">Alberto Salvia Novella (es20490446e)</a> <div class="moz-cite-prefix">El 08/01/13 15:10, C de-Avillez escribió: </div> <blockquote cite="mid:2061598.D0So4SbAHO@xango3" type="cite"> <pre wrap="">On Tuesday, January 08, 2013 00:36:30 Alberto Salvia Novella wrote: </pre> <blockquote type="cite"> <pre wrap="">Please, accept me to join Ubuntu BugSquad and BugControl in Launchpad and I will show you what Raring is going to be. If you need more info about me and how familiar I am with the triaging process, you can have a look at my profile in Launchpad <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="https://launchpad.net/%7Ees20490446e"><https://launchpad.net/%7Ees20490446e></a>. </pre> </blockquote> <pre wrap="">My fault there regarding the Ubuntu-BugSquad. I have added you in (and processed all other pending requests). For Ubuntu BugControl the process is different. You must show you understand how we use status and importance, and you must show bugs you triaged. This process is explained in [1]. Cheers, ..C.. [1] <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugControl">https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugControl</a></pre> <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset> </blockquote> </blockquote> So? <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset> </blockquote> And mine ? </body> </html>