I have written a draft for the Reporting Bugs guide

[Alberto Salvia Novella]

About:
(https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ReportingBugs)
(https://wiki.ubuntu.com/es20490446e/Reporting%20bugs)

Sorry, but I'm absolutely convinced that the latest draft I've written 
is really what's needed.


The sections clearly reflect every use case, and they are organised in a 
logical way. The writing style is conversational and easy to understand.

The content is exactly what the user is looking for, and adding 
something else won't ease their job nor change their behaviour. If 
there's something useful to somebody else, it should go somewhere else.

The imagery suggests the page is easygoing, softens it, and makes it 
more memorable. There's nothing impolite about it, neither gives the 
wrong image of Ubuntu.

The community isn't targeted to super professionals but to all kinds of 
people, many of which are student in their teens.


So either you take it as it is, or you leave what you have. I will wait 
till Sunday the 4th, to let you decide yourselves. I will take that 
resolution as hard fact on what to expect in the future.

I'm looking forward to work only with people who are in complete 
sympathy and harmony with my purpose, which is "easy and straightforward 
over correct".

Thank you.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4747 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-bugsquad/attachments/20170528/fdb3e515/attachment.bin>