sorting bugs

[Alberto Salvia Novella]

Walter Lapchynski:
  > What I mean is working on things you can contribute to right away,
  > e.g. that doesn't require a bunch of research or special hardware.
  > Something where you can do_something_  right away. The idea is
  > focusing on things you can do to move bugs forward. If you hesitate,
  > or lack something, then that should be saved for later.

Brian Tracy:
  > If you have to eat more than one frog, eat the ugliest one first.
  > What this means is, do the worst first. Do the biggest, most
  > difficult task first because that’s the one that makes most of the
  > difference.


Alberto Salvia Novella:
  > For that the first step should be setting priority to each bug that
  > is confirmed, and not to do anything else before that. Then work on
  > the bug with the highest priority and heat.

Walter Lapchynski:
  > Which is a task reserved for bug control members, so not everyone can
  > do this.

Luckily: 
<https://es20490446e.portknox.net/public.php?service=files&t=811bc6b8ab93b2b95ce95484d92864db&download>.


Walter Lapchynski:
  > Aren't they essentially triaged by the time they hit Papercuts?

There are 18 triaged and 58 confirmed papercuts.


Walter Lapchynski:
  > You can use <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/One%20Hundred%20Papercuts/Work-
  > flow/Importance> instead.

Walter Lapchynski:
  > I'm not solely concerned with the easiest to fix bugs.

These priorities fit <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Bug%20importances>, 
it's just they are written shorter.



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3748 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-bugsquad/attachments/20150129/7769df50/attachment-0001.bin>