Papercut definition updated

[Phill Whiteside]

Alberto,

may I remind you of one simple thing... To the person reporting the bug,
there is NO more important bug. You have to please 9 people to get a
recommendation - only need to annoy one to get negative comments.

Just my thoughts.

Phill.


On 13 March 2014 19:12, Alberto Salvia Novella <es20490446e at gmail.com>wrote:

> While setting importances for around 200 bugs, I realized the papercut
> definition was too complicated to be taken into practice by anyone,
> including myself. So I've overly simplified it.
>
> A papercut is a software defect that is:
> - insignificant.
> - fixable by one person within a day.
> - affecting the future release.
>
> What is to say, if you see something ridiculous affecting Trusty, please
> mark it as affecting "One Hundred Papercuts".
>
> Regards <コ:彡
>
> --
> Ubuntu-quality mailing list
> Ubuntu-quality at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/
> mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
>



-- 
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-bugsquad/attachments/20140313/4cea9345/attachment.html>