From es20490446e at gmail.com Thu Feb 6 13:53:11 2014 From: es20490446e at gmail.com (Alberto Salvia Novella) Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 14:53:11 +0100 Subject: Ubuntu Bug Week In-Reply-To: References: <52EE4E5A.8030101@gmail.com> Message-ID: <52F393C7.7080808@gmail.com> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From nicholas.skaggs at canonical.com Thu Feb 6 15:12:10 2014 From: nicholas.skaggs at canonical.com (Nicholas Skaggs) Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 10:12:10 -0500 Subject: Ubuntu Bug Week In-Reply-To: <52F393C7.7080808@gmail.com> References: <52EE4E5A.8030101@gmail.com> <52F393C7.7080808@gmail.com> Message-ID: Alberto, I would suggest giving folks a bit more notice and making a proper announcement :-) I can add it to the calendar and help share details. Feature freeze and beta 1 freeze don't happen till the end of the month. I think waiting a week slots in perfectly fine. Also, my questions remain; thoughts on the timeframe, what tools, etc? Thanks! Nicholas On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 8:53 AM, Alberto Salvia Novella < es20490446e at gmail.com> wrote: > I *had been writing* instructionsfor this event and I'll launch it this night (sorry for the delay). So we > can *start **tomorrow* if you wish 😊 > > And if you have any *idea* of how the event can be improved, just throw a > line. > > Regards and 🙌 > > > El 06/02/14 02:32, Sergio Meneses escribió: > > this sounds great!!! I am in > > Sergio Meneses > Linux User: #478743 > Ubuntu User: #24056 > > > On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Jack Ramsay wrote: > >> Let's go for it. I think it's a really good idea. >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Nicholas Skaggs < >> nicholas.skaggs at canonical.com> wrote: >> >>> Alberto, when did you think of doing this? I think it is a good idea, >>> and I would recommend doing it before beta perhaps? >>> >>> 3 days is a long time; are there 3 days worth of tasks? I am not >>> familiar with how bug days work, so I might be off here. Are there tools in >>> place already for this (aka, understanding how many bugs are closed, etc). >>> I seem to remember there are :-) >>> >>> >>> Nicholas >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Alberto Salvia Novella < >>> es20490446e at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Being Trusty Tahr the flagship of the Ubuntu Community, the 10th >>>> anniversary LTS release (and potentially the most stable of all time, as >>>> errors.ubuntu.com suggests), I was thinking about the possibility of >>>> *organizing* a Bug Week for extra hardening and enjoyment. >>>> >>>> It will be like a regular Bug Day with the following *differences*: >>>> >>>> - It will last *three days*, from Friday to Tuesday on next week. >>>> - There will be *prices* (I'll pay myself). >>>> >>>> So, what do you think of this? >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Ubuntu-quality mailing list >>>> Ubuntu-quality at lists.ubuntu.com >>>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: >>>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Ubuntu-quality mailing list >>> Ubuntu-quality at lists.ubuntu.com >>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: >>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Thanks, >> Jack >> >> -- >> Ubuntu-quality mailing list >> Ubuntu-quality at lists.ubuntu.com >> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality >> >> > > > > > -- > Ubuntu-bugsquad mailing list > Ubuntu-bugsquad at lists.ubuntu.com > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugsquad > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From es20490446e at gmail.com Thu Feb 6 16:54:56 2014 From: es20490446e at gmail.com (Alberto Salvia Novella) Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 17:54:56 +0100 Subject: Ubuntu Bug Week In-Reply-To: References: <52EE4E5A.8030101@gmail.com> <52F393C7.7080808@gmail.com> Message-ID: <52F3BE60.8010005@gmail.com> Okay, so we are doing it *this Saturday*! El 06/02/14 16:12, Nicholas Skaggs escribió: > Alberto, I would suggest giving folks a bit more notice and making a > proper announcement :-) I can add it to the calendar and help share > details. Feature freeze and beta 1 freeze don't happen till the end of > the month. I think waiting a week slots in perfectly fine. > > Also, my questions remain; thoughts on the timeframe, what tools, etc? > Thanks! > > Nicholas > > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 8:53 AM, Alberto Salvia Novella > > wrote: > > I *had been writing* instructions > for this event > and I'll launch it this night (sorry for the delay). So we can > *start **tomorrow* if you wish 😊 > > And if you have any *idea* of how the event can be improved, just > throw a line. > > Regards and 🙌 > > > El 06/02/14 02:32, Sergio Meneses escribió: >> this sounds great!!! I am in >> >> Sergio Meneses >> Linux User: #478743 >> Ubuntu User: #24056 >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Jack Ramsay > > wrote: >> >> Let's go for it. I think it's a really good idea. >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Nicholas Skaggs >> > > wrote: >> >> Alberto, when did you think of doing this? I think it is >> a good idea, and I would recommend doing it before beta >> perhaps? >> >> 3 days is a long time; are there 3 days worth of tasks? I >> am not familiar with how bug days work, so I might be off >> here. Are there tools in place already for this (aka, >> understanding how many bugs are closed, etc). I seem to >> remember there are :-) >> >> >> Nicholas >> >> >> On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Alberto Salvia Novella >> > wrote: >> >> Being Trusty Tahr the flagship of the Ubuntu >> Community, the 10th anniversary LTS release (and >> potentially the most stable of all time, as >> errors.ubuntu.com >> suggests), I was thinking about the possibility of >> *organizing* a Bug Week for extra hardening and >> enjoyment. >> >> It will be like a regular Bug Day with the following >> *differences*: >> >> * It will last *three days*, from Friday to Tuesday >> on next week. >> * There will be *prices* (I'll pay myself). >> >> So, what do you think of this? >> >> -- >> Ubuntu-quality mailing list >> Ubuntu-quality at lists.ubuntu.com >> >> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality >> >> >> >> -- >> Ubuntu-quality mailing list >> Ubuntu-quality at lists.ubuntu.com >> >> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Thanks, >> Jack >> >> -- >> Ubuntu-quality mailing list >> Ubuntu-quality at lists.ubuntu.com >> >> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality >> >> >> >> > > > -- > Ubuntu-bugsquad mailing list > Ubuntu-bugsquad at lists.ubuntu.com > > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugsquad > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From teward at trekweb.org Thu Feb 6 17:03:30 2014 From: teward at trekweb.org (Thomas Ward) Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 12:03:30 -0500 Subject: [Ubuntu-bugcontrol] Ubuntu Bug Week In-Reply-To: <52F3BE60.8010005@gmail.com> References: <52EE4E5A.8030101@gmail.com> <52F393C7.7080808@gmail.com> <52F3BE60.8010005@gmail.com> Message-ID: Wait, I'm confused here... > On Feb 6, 2014, at 11:54, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote: > > Okay, so we are doing it this Saturday! You're saying this Saturday (two days from now).... > El 06/02/14 16:12, Nicholas Skaggs escribió: >> Alberto, I would suggest giving folks a bit more notice and making a proper announcement :-) I can add it to the calendar and help share details. Feature freeze and beta 1 freeze don't happen till the end of the month. I think waiting a week slots in perfectly fine. Yet Nicholas is saying wait a week... >> Also, my questions remain; thoughts on the timeframe, what tools, etc? Thanks! Not to mention you don't answer Nicholas' questions here. >> Nicholas Am I misunderstanding you or was there a message in the chain I missed? Waiting a week, and waiting two days aren't the same thing... ------ Thomas LP: ~teward -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From nicholas.skaggs at canonical.com Thu Feb 6 17:32:12 2014 From: nicholas.skaggs at canonical.com (Nicholas Skaggs) Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 12:32:12 -0500 Subject: [Ubuntu-bugcontrol] Ubuntu Bug Week In-Reply-To: References: <52EE4E5A.8030101@gmail.com> <52F393C7.7080808@gmail.com> <52F3BE60.8010005@gmail.com> Message-ID: Alberto said it worked better for him to stick with the original timetable. I just want to help make things as smooth as possible and provide feedback for running this. I'll add the event to the calendar. I encourage Alberto to announce proper details, and provide more information for new folks. Nicholas On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Thomas Ward wrote: > Wait, I'm confused here... > > > On Feb 6, 2014, at 11:54, Alberto Salvia Novella > wrote: > > Okay, so we are doing it *this Saturday*! > > You're saying this Saturday (two days from now).... > > El 06/02/14 16:12, Nicholas Skaggs escribió: > > Alberto, I would suggest giving folks a bit more notice and making a > proper announcement :-) I can add it to the calendar and help share > details. Feature freeze and beta 1 freeze don't happen till the end of the > month. I think waiting a week slots in perfectly fine. > > Yet Nicholas is saying wait a week... > > Also, my questions remain; thoughts on the timeframe, what tools, etc? > Thanks! > > Not to mention you don't answer Nicholas' questions here. > > Nicholas > > > > > Am I misunderstanding you or was there a message in the chain I missed? > Waiting a week, and waiting two days aren't the same thing... > > ------ > Thomas > LP: ~teward > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From es20490446e at gmail.com Thu Feb 6 17:51:59 2014 From: es20490446e at gmail.com (Alberto Salvia Novella) Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 18:51:59 +0100 Subject: [Ubuntu-bugcontrol] Ubuntu Bug Week In-Reply-To: References: <52EE4E5A.8030101@gmail.com> <52F393C7.7080808@gmail.com> <52F3BE60.8010005@gmail.com> Message-ID: <52F3CBBF.7030806@gmail.com> We talked about it on the IRC: sorry for not mentioning. And I'm publishing all details tonight, so you can review them. El 06/02/14 18:32, Nicholas Skaggs escribió: > Alberto said it worked better for him to stick with the original > timetable. I just want to help make things as smooth as possible and > provide feedback for running this. > > I'll add the event to the calendar. I encourage Alberto to announce > proper details, and provide more information for new folks. > > Nicholas > > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Thomas Ward > wrote: > > Wait, I'm confused here... > > > On Feb 6, 2014, at 11:54, Alberto Salvia Novella > > wrote: > >> Okay, so we are doing it *this Saturday*! >> > You're saying this Saturday (two days from now).... > >> El 06/02/14 16:12, Nicholas Skaggs escribió: >>> Alberto, I would suggest giving folks a bit more notice and >>> making a proper announcement :-) I can add it to the calendar >>> and help share details. Feature freeze and beta 1 freeze don't >>> happen till the end of the month. I think waiting a week slots >>> in perfectly fine. >>> > Yet Nicholas is saying wait a week... > >>> Also, my questions remain; thoughts on the timeframe, what >>> tools, etc? Thanks! >>> > Not to mention you don't answer Nicholas' questions here. > >>> Nicholas > > > > Am I misunderstanding you or was there a message in the chain I > missed? Waiting a week, and waiting two days aren't the same thing... > > ------ > Thomas > LP: ~teward > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From teward at ubuntu.com Thu Feb 6 17:59:25 2014 From: teward at ubuntu.com (Thomas Ward) Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 12:59:25 -0500 Subject: [Ubuntu-bugcontrol] Ubuntu Bug Week In-Reply-To: <52F3CBBF.7030806@gmail.com> References: <52EE4E5A.8030101@gmail.com> <52F393C7.7080808@gmail.com> <52F3BE60.8010005@gmail.com> <52F3CBBF.7030806@gmail.com> Message-ID: On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote: > We talked about it on the IRC: sorry for not mentioning. And I'm publishing > all details tonight, so you can review them. > Ahhh, okay, I thought I was going crazy for a minute there since I didn't see a discussion about that on the list. Sorry for adding to the noise. :) > > El 06/02/14 18:32, Nicholas Skaggs escribió: > > Alberto said it worked better for him to stick with the original timetable. > I just want to help make things as smooth as possible and provide feedback > for running this. > > I'll add the event to the calendar. I encourage Alberto to announce proper > details, and provide more information for new folks. > > Nicholas > > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Thomas Ward wrote: >> >> Wait, I'm confused here... >> >> >> On Feb 6, 2014, at 11:54, Alberto Salvia Novella >> wrote: >> >> Okay, so we are doing it this Saturday! >> >> You're saying this Saturday (two days from now).... >> >> El 06/02/14 16:12, Nicholas Skaggs escribió: >> >> Alberto, I would suggest giving folks a bit more notice and making a >> proper announcement :-) I can add it to the calendar and help share details. >> Feature freeze and beta 1 freeze don't happen till the end of the month. I >> think waiting a week slots in perfectly fine. >> >> Yet Nicholas is saying wait a week... >> >> Also, my questions remain; thoughts on the timeframe, what tools, etc? >> Thanks! >> >> Not to mention you don't answer Nicholas' questions here. >> >> Nicholas >> >> >> >> >> Am I misunderstanding you or was there a message in the chain I missed? >> Waiting a week, and waiting two days aren't the same thing... >> >> ------ >> Thomas >> LP: ~teward > > > ------ Thomas LP: ~teward From noreply at ubuntu.com Thu Feb 6 22:15:28 2014 From: noreply at ubuntu.com (Ubuntu Wiki) Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 22:15:28 -0000 Subject: =?utf-8?q?New_attachment_added_to_page_Bugs/Ubuntu_Bug_Week_on_Ubuntu_Wik?= =?utf-8?q?i?= Message-ID: <20140206221528.5371.54387@mangaba.canonical.com> Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page "Bugs/Ubuntu Bug Week" for change notification. An attachment has been added to that page by es20490446e. Following detailed information is available: Attachment name: Bug importances.png Attachment size: 40990 Attachment link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=Bug+importances.png Page link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week From noreply at ubuntu.com Thu Feb 6 22:18:44 2014 From: noreply at ubuntu.com (Ubuntu Wiki) Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 22:18:44 -0000 Subject: =?utf-8?q?New_attachment_added_to_page_Bugs/Ubuntu_Bug_Week_on_Ubuntu_Wik?= =?utf-8?q?i?= Message-ID: <20140206221844.5341.87036@mangaba.canonical.com> Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page "Bugs/Ubuntu Bug Week" for change notification. An attachment has been added to that page by es20490446e. Following detailed information is available: Attachment name: Bug importances.png Attachment size: 41008 Attachment link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=Bug+importances.png Page link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week From noreply at ubuntu.com Thu Feb 6 22:32:50 2014 From: noreply at ubuntu.com (Ubuntu Wiki) Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 22:32:50 -0000 Subject: =?utf-8?q?New_attachment_added_to_page_Bugs/Ubuntu_Bug_Week_on_Ubuntu_Wik?= =?utf-8?q?i?= Message-ID: <20140206223250.9212.68313@mangaba.canonical.com> Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page "Bugs/Ubuntu Bug Week" for change notification. An attachment has been added to that page by es20490446e. Following detailed information is available: Attachment name: Bugs importances.png Attachment size: 41008 Attachment link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=Bugs+importances.png Page link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week From noreply at ubuntu.com Thu Feb 6 22:39:46 2014 From: noreply at ubuntu.com (Ubuntu Wiki) Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 22:39:46 -0000 Subject: =?utf-8?q?New_attachment_added_to_page_Bugs/Ubuntu_Bug_Week_on_Ubuntu_Wik?= =?utf-8?q?i?= Message-ID: <20140206223946.9206.73287@mangaba.canonical.com> Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page "Bugs/Ubuntu Bug Week" for change notification. An attachment has been added to that page by es20490446e. Following detailed information is available: Attachment name: Bugs confirmation.png Attachment size: 28435 Attachment link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=Bugs+confirmation.png Page link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week From noreply at ubuntu.com Thu Feb 6 22:43:12 2014 From: noreply at ubuntu.com (Ubuntu Wiki) Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 22:43:12 -0000 Subject: =?utf-8?q?New_attachment_added_to_page_Bugs/Ubuntu_Bug_Week_on_Ubuntu_Wik?= =?utf-8?q?i?= Message-ID: <20140206224312.9212.45044@mangaba.canonical.com> Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page "Bugs/Ubuntu Bug Week" for change notification. An attachment has been added to that page by es20490446e. Following detailed information is available: Attachment name: Bugs importances.png Attachment size: 41008 Attachment link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=Bugs+importances.png Page link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week From noreply at ubuntu.com Thu Feb 6 22:46:14 2014 From: noreply at ubuntu.com (Ubuntu Wiki) Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 22:46:14 -0000 Subject: =?utf-8?q?=5BUbuntu_Wiki=5D_Update_of_=22Bugs/Ubuntu_Bug_Week=22_by_es204?= =?utf-8?q?90446e?= Message-ID: <20140206224614.9218.68230@mangaba.canonical.com> Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Ubuntu Wiki" for change notification. The "Bugs/Ubuntu Bug Week" page has been changed by es20490446e: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week?action=diff&rev1=11&rev2=12 - - == 🔖 Bug Control: Set bug importances == + === 🔖 Bug Control: Set bug importances === {{attachment:Bugs importances.png||height=225}} From noreply at ubuntu.com Thu Feb 6 23:26:14 2014 From: noreply at ubuntu.com (Ubuntu Wiki) Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 23:26:14 -0000 Subject: =?utf-8?q?New_attachment_added_to_page_Bugs/Ubuntu_Bug_Week_on_Ubuntu_Wik?= =?utf-8?q?i?= Message-ID: <20140206232614.12936.58202@mangaba.canonical.com> Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page "Bugs/Ubuntu Bug Week" for change notification. An attachment has been added to that page by es20490446e. Following detailed information is available: Attachment name: Ubuntu Bug Week Logo.png Attachment size: 34953 Attachment link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=Ubuntu+Bug+Week+Logo.png Page link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week From noreply at ubuntu.com Thu Feb 6 23:43:24 2014 From: noreply at ubuntu.com (Ubuntu Wiki) Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 23:43:24 -0000 Subject: =?utf-8?q?New_attachment_added_to_page_Bugs/Ubuntu_Bug_Week_on_Ubuntu_Wik?= =?utf-8?q?i?= Message-ID: <20140206234324.17752.3319@mangaba.canonical.com> Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page "Bugs/Ubuntu Bug Week" for change notification. An attachment has been added to that page by es20490446e. Following detailed information is available: Attachment name: Improvement indicators.ods Attachment size: 26791 Attachment link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=Improvement+indicators.ods Page link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week From noreply at ubuntu.com Thu Feb 6 17:43:52 2014 From: noreply at ubuntu.com (Ubuntu Wiki) Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 17:43:52 -0000 Subject: =?utf-8?q?=5BUbuntu_Wiki=5D_Update_of_=22Bugs/Ubuntu_Bug_Week=22_by_es204?= =?utf-8?q?90446e?= Message-ID: <20140206174352.4999.61731@mangaba.canonical.com> Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Ubuntu Wiki" for change notification. The "Bugs/Ubuntu Bug Week" page has been changed by es20490446e: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week?action=diff&rev1=7&rev2=8 - == == - === 🔖 Bug Control: Set bug importances === * [[http://tinyurl.com/q9mgyyy|List of bugs]] From noreply at ubuntu.com Thu Feb 6 22:27:30 2014 From: noreply at ubuntu.com (Ubuntu Wiki) Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 22:27:30 -0000 Subject: =?utf-8?q?New_attachment_added_to_page_Bugs/Ubuntu_Bug_Week_on_Ubuntu_Wik?= =?utf-8?q?i?= Message-ID: <20140206222730.5347.6177@mangaba.canonical.com> Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page "Bugs/Ubuntu Bug Week" for change notification. An attachment has been added to that page by es20490446e. Following detailed information is available: Attachment name: Papercuts fixing.png Attachment size: 30947 Attachment link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=Papercuts+fixing.png Page link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week From noreply at ubuntu.com Thu Feb 6 22:32:27 2014 From: noreply at ubuntu.com (Ubuntu Wiki) Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 22:32:27 -0000 Subject: =?utf-8?q?New_attachment_added_to_page_Bugs/Ubuntu_Bug_Week_on_Ubuntu_Wik?= =?utf-8?q?i?= Message-ID: <20140206223227.9212.11539@mangaba.canonical.com> Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page "Bugs/Ubuntu Bug Week" for change notification. An attachment has been added to that page by es20490446e. Following detailed information is available: Attachment name: Bug's importances.png Attachment size: 41008 Attachment link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=Bug%27s+importances.png Page link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week From noreply at ubuntu.com Thu Feb 6 23:36:37 2014 From: noreply at ubuntu.com (Ubuntu Wiki) Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 23:36:37 -0000 Subject: =?utf-8?q?New_attachment_added_to_page_Bugs/Ubuntu_Bug_Week_on_Ubuntu_Wik?= =?utf-8?q?i?= Message-ID: <20140206233637.17788.41530@mangaba.canonical.com> Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page "Bugs/Ubuntu Bug Week" for change notification. An attachment has been added to that page by es20490446e. Following detailed information is available: Attachment name: Ubuntu Bug Week Logo.png Attachment size: 36194 Attachment link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=Ubuntu+Bug+Week+Logo.png Page link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week From noreply at ubuntu.com Thu Feb 6 23:38:41 2014 From: noreply at ubuntu.com (Ubuntu Wiki) Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 23:38:41 -0000 Subject: =?utf-8?q?New_attachment_added_to_page_Bugs/Ubuntu_Bug_Week_on_Ubuntu_Wik?= =?utf-8?q?i?= Message-ID: <20140206233841.17752.80370@mangaba.canonical.com> Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page "Bugs/Ubuntu Bug Week" for change notification. An attachment has been added to that page by es20490446e. Following detailed information is available: Attachment name: Ubuntu Bug Week Logo.svg Attachment size: 13160 Attachment link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=Ubuntu+Bug+Week+Logo.svg Page link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week From es20490446e at gmail.com Fri Feb 7 02:11:28 2014 From: es20490446e at gmail.com (Alberto Salvia Novella) Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 03:11:28 +0100 Subject: Ubuntu Bug Week In-Reply-To: <52F3BE60.8010005@gmail.com> References: <52EE4E5A.8030101@gmail.com> <52F393C7.7080808@gmail.com> <52F3BE60.8010005@gmail.com> Message-ID: <52F440D0.4090803@gmail.com> The Bug Week draft *i**s ready* for review and suggestions. I also have noticed the Ubuntu *Trademark* Team to review the site for intellectual property policy accomplishment. Regards, and I'm going to nite nite now 🌙 El 06/02/14 17:54, Alberto Salvia Novella escribió: > Okay, so we are doing it *this Saturday*! > > > El 06/02/14 16:12, Nicholas Skaggs escribió: >> Alberto, I would suggest giving folks a bit more notice and making a >> proper announcement :-) I can add it to the calendar and help share >> details. Feature freeze and beta 1 freeze don't happen till the end >> of the month. I think waiting a week slots in perfectly fine. >> >> Also, my questions remain; thoughts on the timeframe, what tools, >> etc? Thanks! >> >> Nicholas >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 8:53 AM, Alberto Salvia Novella >> > wrote: >> >> I *had been writing* instructions >> for this event >> and I'll launch it this night (sorry for the delay). So we can >> *start **tomorrow* if you wish 😊 >> >> And if you have any *idea* of how the event can be improved, just >> throw a line. >> >> Regards and 🙌 >> >> >> El 06/02/14 02:32, Sergio Meneses escribió: >>> this sounds great!!! I am in >>> >>> Sergio Meneses >>> Linux User: #478743 >>> Ubuntu User: #24056 >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Jack Ramsay >> > wrote: >>> >>> Let's go for it. I think it's a really good idea. >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Nicholas Skaggs >>> >> > wrote: >>> >>> Alberto, when did you think of doing this? I think it is >>> a good idea, and I would recommend doing it before beta >>> perhaps? >>> >>> 3 days is a long time; are there 3 days worth of tasks? >>> I am not familiar with how bug days work, so I might be >>> off here. Are there tools in place already for this >>> (aka, understanding how many bugs are closed, etc). I >>> seem to remember there are :-) >>> >>> >>> Nicholas >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Alberto Salvia Novella >>> > >>> wrote: >>> >>> Being Trusty Tahr the flagship of the Ubuntu >>> Community, the 10th anniversary LTS release (and >>> potentially the most stable of all time, as >>> errors.ubuntu.com >>> suggests), I was thinking about the possibility of >>> *organizing* a Bug Week for extra hardening and >>> enjoyment. >>> >>> It will be like a regular Bug Day with the following >>> *differences*: >>> >>> * It will last *three days*, from Friday to >>> Tuesday on next week. >>> * There will be *prices* (I'll pay myself). >>> >>> So, what do you think of this? >>> >>> -- >>> Ubuntu-quality mailing list >>> Ubuntu-quality at lists.ubuntu.com >>> >>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: >>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Ubuntu-quality mailing list >>> Ubuntu-quality at lists.ubuntu.com >>> >>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: >>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Thanks, >>> Jack >>> >>> -- >>> Ubuntu-quality mailing list >>> Ubuntu-quality at lists.ubuntu.com >>> >>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: >>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Ubuntu-bugsquad mailing list >> Ubuntu-bugsquad at lists.ubuntu.com >> >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugsquad >> >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From es20490446e at gmail.com Fri Feb 7 02:12:40 2014 From: es20490446e at gmail.com (Alberto Salvia Novella) Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 03:12:40 +0100 Subject: Ubuntu Bug Week In-Reply-To: <52F440D0.4090803@gmail.com> References: <52EE4E5A.8030101@gmail.com> <52F393C7.7080808@gmail.com> <52F3BE60.8010005@gmail.com> <52F440D0.4090803@gmail.com> Message-ID: <52F44118.1050707@gmail.com> Sorry, I forgot the link to the draft . El 07/02/14 03:11, Alberto Salvia Novella escribió: > The Bug Week draft *i**s ready* for review and suggestions. I also > have noticed the Ubuntu *Trademark* Team to review the site for > intellectual property policy accomplishment. > > Regards, and I'm going to nite nite now 🌙 > > > El 06/02/14 17:54, Alberto Salvia Novella escribió: >> Okay, so we are doing it *this Saturday*! >> >> >> El 06/02/14 16:12, Nicholas Skaggs escribió: >>> Alberto, I would suggest giving folks a bit more notice and making a >>> proper announcement :-) I can add it to the calendar and help share >>> details. Feature freeze and beta 1 freeze don't happen till the end >>> of the month. I think waiting a week slots in perfectly fine. >>> >>> Also, my questions remain; thoughts on the timeframe, what tools, >>> etc? Thanks! >>> >>> Nicholas >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 8:53 AM, Alberto Salvia Novella >>> > wrote: >>> >>> I *had been writing* instructions >>> for this >>> event and I'll launch it this night (sorry for the delay). So we >>> can *start **tomorrow* if you wish 😊 >>> >>> And if you have any *idea* of how the event can be improved, >>> just throw a line. >>> >>> Regards and 🙌 >>> >>> >>> El 06/02/14 02:32, Sergio Meneses escribió: >>>> this sounds great!!! I am in >>>> >>>> Sergio Meneses >>>> Linux User: #478743 >>>> Ubuntu User: #24056 >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Jack Ramsay >>> > wrote: >>>> >>>> Let's go for it. I think it's a really good idea. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Nicholas Skaggs >>>> >>> > wrote: >>>> >>>> Alberto, when did you think of doing this? I think it >>>> is a good idea, and I would recommend doing it before >>>> beta perhaps? >>>> >>>> 3 days is a long time; are there 3 days worth of tasks? >>>> I am not familiar with how bug days work, so I might be >>>> off here. Are there tools in place already for this >>>> (aka, understanding how many bugs are closed, etc). I >>>> seem to remember there are :-) >>>> >>>> >>>> Nicholas >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Alberto Salvia Novella >>>> > >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Being Trusty Tahr the flagship of the Ubuntu >>>> Community, the 10th anniversary LTS release (and >>>> potentially the most stable of all time, as >>>> errors.ubuntu.com >>>> suggests), I was thinking about the possibility of >>>> *organizing* a Bug Week for extra hardening and >>>> enjoyment. >>>> >>>> It will be like a regular Bug Day with the >>>> following *differences*: >>>> >>>> * It will last *three days*, from Friday to >>>> Tuesday on next week. >>>> * There will be *prices* (I'll pay myself). >>>> >>>> So, what do you think of this? >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Ubuntu-quality mailing list >>>> Ubuntu-quality at lists.ubuntu.com >>>> >>>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: >>>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Ubuntu-quality mailing list >>>> Ubuntu-quality at lists.ubuntu.com >>>> >>>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: >>>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Thanks, >>>> Jack >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Ubuntu-quality mailing list >>>> Ubuntu-quality at lists.ubuntu.com >>>> >>>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: >>>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Ubuntu-bugsquad mailing list >>> Ubuntu-bugsquad at lists.ubuntu.com >>> >>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugsquad >>> >>> >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From noreply at ubuntu.com Fri Feb 7 00:26:02 2014 From: noreply at ubuntu.com (Ubuntu Wiki) Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 00:26:02 -0000 Subject: =?utf-8?q?New_attachment_added_to_page_Bugs/Ubuntu_Bug_Week/Confirm_bugs_?= =?utf-8?q?on_Ubuntu_Wiki?= Message-ID: <20140207002602.20832.9638@mangaba.canonical.com> Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page "Bugs/Ubuntu Bug Week/Confirm bugs" for change notification. An attachment has been added to that page by es20490446e. Following detailed information is available: Attachment name: Confirm bugs.png Attachment size: 56590 Attachment link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week/Confirm%20bugs?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=Confirm+bugs.png Page link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week/Confirm%20bugs From es20490446e at gmail.com Fri Feb 7 02:48:06 2014 From: es20490446e at gmail.com (Alberto Salvia Novella) Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 03:48:06 +0100 Subject: Ubuntu Bug Week Announcement In-Reply-To: <52F440D0.4090803@gmail.com> References: <52EE4E5A.8030101@gmail.com> <52F393C7.7080808@gmail.com> <52F3BE60.8010005@gmail.com> <52F440D0.4090803@gmail.com> Message-ID: <52F44966.8000807@gmail.com> 🐞*Ubuntu Bug Week* As said by Joel Spolsky, *good software* usually takes 10 years to become well made. And this appears the case for Ubuntu 14.04; the most stable release of all time, as it can be seen in its Error Tracker . So the Ubuntu Bug Week *is an event* aimed to harden our 10th anniversary Ubuntu LTS release; and make Trusty Tahr not only the flagship of the Ubuntu Community, but the most amazing experience in computing. It is designed to have *easy and enjoyable* tasks which nearly everyone can take, but with a great impact in overall system quality. It is also a great *opportunity* for computer enthusiasts to get in touch with how the most popular libre operating system in the world is made. Bug Week will last two days: from *Saturday 8th* to *Sunday 9th*. And, for each list, the person who contributed in more bugs (what we will review for errors) will be able to choose from some *prices*: an limited edition Ubuntu Mug and the next Indie Humble Bundle to be released! You *can visit* the event here ! Have a nice day 🌅 ---------- 📨 Please, consider passing this mail (hiding recipients addresses) to people you'll know they will be interested in it. If you're a computing student, please pass it to your faculty. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From noreply at ubuntu.com Fri Feb 7 12:02:28 2014 From: noreply at ubuntu.com (Ubuntu Wiki) Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 12:02:28 -0000 Subject: =?utf-8?q?New_attachment_added_to_page_Bugs/Ubuntu_Bug_Week_on_Ubuntu_Wik?= =?utf-8?q?i?= Message-ID: <20140207120228.8339.65414@mangaba.canonical.com> Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page "Bugs/Ubuntu Bug Week" for change notification. An attachment has been added to that page by es20490446e. Following detailed information is available: Attachment name: Bugs importances.png Attachment size: 41352 Attachment link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=Bugs+importances.png Page link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week From noreply at ubuntu.com Fri Feb 7 12:06:13 2014 From: noreply at ubuntu.com (Ubuntu Wiki) Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 12:06:13 -0000 Subject: =?utf-8?q?New_attachment_added_to_page_Bugs/Ubuntu_Bug_Week_on_Ubuntu_Wik?= =?utf-8?q?i?= Message-ID: <20140207120613.8431.71724@mangaba.canonical.com> Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page "Bugs/Ubuntu Bug Week" for change notification. An attachment has been added to that page by es20490446e. Following detailed information is available: Attachment name: Bugs confirmation.png Attachment size: 28502 Attachment link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=Bugs+confirmation.png Page link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week From noreply at ubuntu.com Fri Feb 7 12:20:11 2014 From: noreply at ubuntu.com (Ubuntu Wiki) Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 12:20:11 -0000 Subject: =?utf-8?q?=5BUbuntu_Wiki=5D_Update_of_=22Bugs/Ubuntu_Bug_Week=22_by_es204?= =?utf-8?q?90446e?= Message-ID: <20140207122011.8444.78657@mangaba.canonical.com> Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Ubuntu Wiki" for change notification. The "Bugs/Ubuntu Bug Week" page has been changed by es20490446e: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week?action=diff&rev1=22&rev2=23 So the Ubuntu Bug Week '''is an event''' aimed to harden our 10th anniversary Ubuntu LTS release; and make Trusty Tahr not only the flagship of the Ubuntu Community, but the most amazing experience in computing. It is designed to have '''easy and enjoyable''' tasks which nearly everyone can take, but with a great impact in overall system quality. It is also a great '''opportunity''' for computer enthusiasts to get in touch with how the most popular libre operating system in the world is made. + :) [[http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=ubuntu-quality|Chat with us!]] + Bug Week will last two days: from '''Saturday 8th''' to '''Sunday 9th'''. And, for each list, the person who contributed in more bugs (what we will review for errors) will be able to choose from one of the following '''prizes''': From noreply at ubuntu.com Fri Feb 7 12:04:16 2014 From: noreply at ubuntu.com (Ubuntu Wiki) Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 12:04:16 -0000 Subject: =?utf-8?q?New_attachment_added_to_page_Bugs/Ubuntu_Bug_Week_on_Ubuntu_Wik?= =?utf-8?q?i?= Message-ID: <20140207120416.8425.93914@mangaba.canonical.com> Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page "Bugs/Ubuntu Bug Week" for change notification. An attachment has been added to that page by es20490446e. Following detailed information is available: Attachment name: Papercuts fixing.png Attachment size: 31009 Attachment link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=Papercuts+fixing.png Page link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week From es20490446e at gmail.com Fri Feb 7 21:04:51 2014 From: es20490446e at gmail.com (Alberto Salvia Novella) Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 22:04:51 +0100 Subject: Ubuntu Bug Week is about to start! Message-ID: <52F54A73.5080204@gmail.com> The Ubuntu Bug Week will: * *Start* tomorrow Saturday 8, at 00:00 (in your time zone) * *End* on Monday 10, at 00:00 (in your time zone) So everyone can *freely choose* how to manage their time, with *equal opportunities* through geographies. 💃*Lets rock!!!! * -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From noreply at ubuntu.com Fri Feb 7 20:51:38 2014 From: noreply at ubuntu.com (Ubuntu Wiki) Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 20:51:38 -0000 Subject: =?utf-8?q?=5BUbuntu_Wiki=5D_Update_of_=22Bugs/Ubuntu_Bug_Week/Fix_papercu?= =?utf-8?q?ts_contributors=22_by_es20490446e?= Message-ID: <20140207205138.5503.53887@mangaba.canonical.com> Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Ubuntu Wiki" for change notification. The "Bugs/Ubuntu Bug Week/Fix papercuts contributors" page has been changed by es20490446e: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week/Fix%20papercuts%20contributors?action=diff&rev1=2&rev2=3 * (!) '''Edit''' this wiki page with your info to subscribe. - * /!\ Warning: if you win the Bug Week, we will '''check for errors''' in contributions; each of which will discount as having '''-1''' of the total for this list! + * /!\ Warning: if you win the Bug Week, we will '''check for errors''' and time in contributions; each of which will discount as having '''-1''' of the total for this list! == == From noreply at ubuntu.com Fri Feb 7 20:51:14 2014 From: noreply at ubuntu.com (Ubuntu Wiki) Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 20:51:14 -0000 Subject: =?utf-8?q?=5BUbuntu_Wiki=5D_Update_of_=22Bugs/Ubuntu_Bug_Week/Set_bug_imp?= =?utf-8?q?ortances_contributors=22_by_es20490446e?= Message-ID: <20140207205114.5491.63319@mangaba.canonical.com> Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Ubuntu Wiki" for change notification. The "Bugs/Ubuntu Bug Week/Set bug importances contributors" page has been changed by es20490446e: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week/Set%20bug%20importances%20contributors?action=diff&rev1=3&rev2=4 * (!) '''Edit''' this wiki page with your info to subscribe. - * /!\ Warning: if you win the Bug Week, we will '''check for errors''' in contributions; each of which will discount as having '''-10''' of the total for this list! + * /!\ Warning: if you win the Bug Week, we will '''check for errors''' and time in contributions; each of which will discount as having '''-10''' of the total for this list! == == From noreply at ubuntu.com Fri Feb 7 20:52:05 2014 From: noreply at ubuntu.com (Ubuntu Wiki) Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 20:52:05 -0000 Subject: =?utf-8?q?=5BUbuntu_Wiki=5D_Update_of_=22Bugs/Ubuntu_Bug_Week/Confirm_bug?= =?utf-8?q?s_contributors=22_by_es20490446e?= Message-ID: <20140207205205.5503.54610@mangaba.canonical.com> Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Ubuntu Wiki" for change notification. The "Bugs/Ubuntu Bug Week/Confirm bugs contributors" page has been changed by es20490446e: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week/Confirm%20bugs%20contributors?action=diff&rev1=2&rev2=3 * (!) '''Edit''' this wiki page with your info to subscribe. - * /!\ Warning: if you win the Bug Week, we will '''check for errors''' in contributions; each of which will discount as having '''-4''' of the total for this list! + * /!\ Warning: if you win the Bug Week, we will '''check for errors''' and time in contributions; each of which will discount as having '''-4''' of the total for this list! == == From es20490446e at gmail.com Sat Feb 8 19:51:36 2014 From: es20490446e at gmail.com (Alberto Salvia Novella) Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 20:51:36 +0100 Subject: =?UTF-8?B?8J+OryBUYXJnZXQgYmVmb3JlIGZpcmluZw==?= Message-ID: <52F68AC8.20803@gmail.com> Because: * There are more than *a hundred* confirmed bugs with undecided importance for Trusty. * Nearly all of them have a priority of "*high*". * A great part of them affect packages carried in the *default* Ubuntu installation. I'm asking you for *help* reducing the list . If this is not done, these bugs will not be arbitrated correctly and *will remain unknown* till Trusty goes massively used. That is, when it hits *final release*. Note this is the *main reason* why releases have been impressively buggy at their launch time, and not because of not having enough developers. What happens is just what is most *important remains unnoticeable* till everything crashes. *Alternatively*, at this time, you can also give a hand on this task in the Ubuntu Bug Week . Regards 🌿 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ubuntu at treblig.org Sat Feb 8 20:25:29 2014 From: ubuntu at treblig.org (Dr. David Alan Gilbert) Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2014 20:25:29 +0000 Subject: [CRM114spam]: [Ubuntu-bugcontrol] ???? Target before firing In-Reply-To: <52F68AC8.20803@gmail.com> References: <52F68AC8.20803@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20140208202529.GC32684@gallifrey> * Alberto Salvia Novella (es20490446e at gmail.com) wrote: > Because: > > * There are more than *a hundred* confirmed bugs > with undecided importance for Trusty. > * Nearly all of them have a priority of "*high*". > * A great part of them affect packages carried in the *default* Ubuntu > installation. > > I'm asking you for *help* reducing the list . It's probably good to link to the : https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Bug%20importances instructions on how to pick the importance values. (I take these as a guide personally rather than a rule - if something eats someones cat but would otherwise be marked Low according to those rules, I'd probably make it a medium). Dave -- -----Open up your eyes, open up your mind, open up your code ------- / Dr. David Alan Gilbert | Running GNU/Linux | Happy \ \ gro.gilbert @ treblig.org | | In Hex / \ _________________________|_____ http://www.treblig.org |_______/ From ubuntu at treblig.org Sat Feb 8 20:26:30 2014 From: ubuntu at treblig.org (Dr. David Alan Gilbert) Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2014 20:26:30 +0000 Subject: [Ubuntu-bugcontrol] ???? Target before firing In-Reply-To: <20140208202529.GC32684@gallifrey> References: <52F68AC8.20803@gmail.com> <20140208202529.GC32684@gallifrey> Message-ID: <20140208202630.GD32684@gallifrey> (resend to remove spam tag - sorry) * Alberto Salvia Novella (es20490446e at gmail.com) wrote: > Because: > > * There are more than *a hundred* confirmed bugs > with undecided importance for Trusty. > * Nearly all of them have a priority of "*high*". > * A great part of them affect packages carried in the *default* Ubuntu > installation. > > I'm asking you for *help* reducing the list . It's probably good to link to the : https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Bug%20importances instructions on how to pick the importance values. (I take these as a guide personally rather than a rule - if something eats someones cat but would otherwise be marked Low according to those rules, I'd probably make it a medium). Dave -- -----Open up your eyes, open up your mind, open up your code ------- / Dr. David Alan Gilbert | Running GNU/Linux | Happy \ \ gro.gilbert @ treblig.org | | In Hex / \ _________________________|_____ http://www.treblig.org |_______/ From noreply at ubuntu.com Fri Feb 7 23:41:03 2014 From: noreply at ubuntu.com (Ubuntu Wiki) Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 23:41:03 -0000 Subject: =?utf-8?q?New_attachment_added_to_page_Bugs/Ubuntu_Bug_Week_on_Ubuntu_Wik?= =?utf-8?q?i?= Message-ID: <20140207234103.29183.3835@mangaba.canonical.com> Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page "Bugs/Ubuntu Bug Week" for change notification. An attachment has been added to that page by es20490446e. Following detailed information is available: Attachment name: Bug importances.png Attachment size: 41469 Attachment link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=Bug+importances.png Page link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week From noreply at ubuntu.com Sat Feb 8 16:03:05 2014 From: noreply at ubuntu.com (Ubuntu Wiki) Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 16:03:05 -0000 Subject: =?utf-8?q?New_attachment_added_to_page_Bugs/Ubuntu_Bug_Week_on_Ubuntu_Wik?= =?utf-8?q?i?= Message-ID: <20140208160305.19116.91588@mangaba.canonical.com> Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page "Bugs/Ubuntu Bug Week" for change notification. An attachment has been added to that page by es20490446e. Following detailed information is available: Attachment name: Bugs importances.png Attachment size: 41599 Attachment link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=Bugs+importances.png Page link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week From noreply at ubuntu.com Sun Feb 9 00:57:57 2014 From: noreply at ubuntu.com (Ubuntu Wiki) Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2014 00:57:57 -0000 Subject: =?utf-8?q?New_attachment_added_to_page_Bugs/Ubuntu_Bug_Week_on_Ubuntu_Wik?= =?utf-8?q?i?= Message-ID: <20140209005757.16917.87909@mangaba.canonical.com> Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page "Bugs/Ubuntu Bug Week" for change notification. An attachment has been added to that page by es20490446e. Following detailed information is available: Attachment name: Bugs importances.png Attachment size: 37922 Attachment link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=Bugs+importances.png Page link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week From noreply at ubuntu.com Fri Feb 7 23:37:21 2014 From: noreply at ubuntu.com (Ubuntu Wiki) Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 23:37:21 -0000 Subject: =?utf-8?q?New_attachment_added_to_page_Bugs/Ubuntu_Bug_Week_on_Ubuntu_Wik?= =?utf-8?q?i?= Message-ID: <20140207233721.29189.16252@mangaba.canonical.com> Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page "Bugs/Ubuntu Bug Week" for change notification. An attachment has been added to that page by es20490446e. Following detailed information is available: Attachment name: Bugs confirmation.png Attachment size: 30048 Attachment link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=Bugs+confirmation.png Page link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week From noreply at ubuntu.com Fri Feb 7 23:39:06 2014 From: noreply at ubuntu.com (Ubuntu Wiki) Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 23:39:06 -0000 Subject: =?utf-8?q?New_attachment_added_to_page_Bugs/Ubuntu_Bug_Week_on_Ubuntu_Wik?= =?utf-8?q?i?= Message-ID: <20140207233906.29106.57331@mangaba.canonical.com> Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page "Bugs/Ubuntu Bug Week" for change notification. An attachment has been added to that page by es20490446e. Following detailed information is available: Attachment name: Papercuts fixing.png Attachment size: 31053 Attachment link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=Papercuts+fixing.png Page link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week From noreply at ubuntu.com Fri Feb 7 23:42:09 2014 From: noreply at ubuntu.com (Ubuntu Wiki) Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 23:42:09 -0000 Subject: =?utf-8?q?New_attachment_added_to_page_Bugs/Ubuntu_Bug_Week_on_Ubuntu_Wik?= =?utf-8?q?i?= Message-ID: <20140207234209.29183.1508@mangaba.canonical.com> Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page "Bugs/Ubuntu Bug Week" for change notification. An attachment has been added to that page by es20490446e. Following detailed information is available: Attachment name: Bug importances.png Attachment size: 41469 Attachment link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=Bug+importances.png Page link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week From noreply at ubuntu.com Fri Feb 7 23:43:00 2014 From: noreply at ubuntu.com (Ubuntu Wiki) Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 23:43:00 -0000 Subject: =?utf-8?q?New_attachment_added_to_page_Bugs/Ubuntu_Bug_Week_on_Ubuntu_Wik?= =?utf-8?q?i?= Message-ID: <20140207234300.29189.92738@mangaba.canonical.com> Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page "Bugs/Ubuntu Bug Week" for change notification. An attachment has been added to that page by es20490446e. Following detailed information is available: Attachment name: Bugs importances.png Attachment size: 41469 Attachment link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=Bugs+importances.png Page link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week From noreply at ubuntu.com Sat Feb 8 05:30:51 2014 From: noreply at ubuntu.com (Ubuntu Wiki) Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 05:30:51 -0000 Subject: =?utf-8?q?=5BUbuntu_Wiki=5D_Update_of_=22Bugs/Ubuntu_Bug_Week/Set_bug_imp?= =?utf-8?q?ortances_contributors=22_by_chilicuil?= Message-ID: <20140208053051.6686.87797@mangaba.canonical.com> Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Ubuntu Wiki" for change notification. The "Bugs/Ubuntu Bug Week/Set bug importances contributors" page has been changed by chilicuil: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week/Set%20bug%20importances%20contributors?action=diff&rev1=4&rev2=5 ||User||Time zone||Quantity of managed bugs||List of bugs|| ||[[https://launchpad.net/~es20490446e|es20490446e]]||+1||0||[[http://pad.ubuntu.com/ZxEgHwUrCC|List]]|| + ||[[https://launchpad.net/~chilicuil|chilicuil]]||-6||0||[[http://pad.ubuntu.com/dPR8PO9BPx|List]]|| From noreply at ubuntu.com Sat Feb 8 09:24:14 2014 From: noreply at ubuntu.com (Ubuntu Wiki) Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 09:24:14 -0000 Subject: =?utf-8?q?New_attachment_added_to_page_Bugs/Ubuntu_Bug_Week_on_Ubuntu_Wik?= =?utf-8?q?i?= Message-ID: <20140208092414.32599.68933@mangaba.canonical.com> Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page "Bugs/Ubuntu Bug Week" for change notification. An attachment has been added to that page by es20490446e. Following detailed information is available: Attachment name: Bugs importances.png Attachment size: 41551 Attachment link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=Bugs+importances.png Page link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week From noreply at ubuntu.com Sat Feb 8 09:25:48 2014 From: noreply at ubuntu.com (Ubuntu Wiki) Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 09:25:48 -0000 Subject: =?utf-8?q?New_attachment_added_to_page_Bugs/Ubuntu_Bug_Week_on_Ubuntu_Wik?= =?utf-8?q?i?= Message-ID: <20140208092548.32646.25413@mangaba.canonical.com> Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page "Bugs/Ubuntu Bug Week" for change notification. An attachment has been added to that page by es20490446e. Following detailed information is available: Attachment name: Papercuts fixing.png Attachment size: 31093 Attachment link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=Papercuts+fixing.png Page link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week From noreply at ubuntu.com Sat Feb 8 09:27:25 2014 From: noreply at ubuntu.com (Ubuntu Wiki) Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 09:27:25 -0000 Subject: =?utf-8?q?New_attachment_added_to_page_Bugs/Ubuntu_Bug_Week_on_Ubuntu_Wik?= =?utf-8?q?i?= Message-ID: <20140208092725.32658.9684@mangaba.canonical.com> Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page "Bugs/Ubuntu Bug Week" for change notification. An attachment has been added to that page by es20490446e. Following detailed information is available: Attachment name: Bugs confirmation.png Attachment size: 31261 Attachment link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=Bugs+confirmation.png Page link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week From noreply at ubuntu.com Sat Feb 8 16:03:53 2014 From: noreply at ubuntu.com (Ubuntu Wiki) Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 16:03:53 -0000 Subject: =?utf-8?q?New_attachment_added_to_page_Bugs/Ubuntu_Bug_Week_on_Ubuntu_Wik?= =?utf-8?q?i?= Message-ID: <20140208160353.19134.59937@mangaba.canonical.com> Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page "Bugs/Ubuntu Bug Week" for change notification. An attachment has been added to that page by es20490446e. Following detailed information is available: Attachment name: Papercuts fixing.png Attachment size: 31148 Attachment link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=Papercuts+fixing.png Page link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week From noreply at ubuntu.com Sat Feb 8 16:05:01 2014 From: noreply at ubuntu.com (Ubuntu Wiki) Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 16:05:01 -0000 Subject: =?utf-8?q?New_attachment_added_to_page_Bugs/Ubuntu_Bug_Week_on_Ubuntu_Wik?= =?utf-8?q?i?= Message-ID: <20140208160501.19128.42739@mangaba.canonical.com> Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page "Bugs/Ubuntu Bug Week" for change notification. An attachment has been added to that page by es20490446e. Following detailed information is available: Attachment name: Bugs confirmation.png Attachment size: 31306 Attachment link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=Bugs+confirmation.png Page link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week From noreply at ubuntu.com Sat Feb 8 16:55:53 2014 From: noreply at ubuntu.com (Ubuntu Wiki) Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 16:55:53 -0000 Subject: =?utf-8?q?=5BUbuntu_Wiki=5D_Update_of_=22Bugs/Ubuntu_Bug_Week/Set_bug_imp?= =?utf-8?q?ortances_contributors=22_by_es20490446e?= Message-ID: <20140208165553.21818.56833@mangaba.canonical.com> Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Ubuntu Wiki" for change notification. The "Bugs/Ubuntu Bug Week/Set bug importances contributors" page has been changed by es20490446e: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week/Set%20bug%20importances%20contributors?action=diff&rev1=5&rev2=6 ## 📃 You can use pad.ubuntu.com, and link here, to list your contributed bugs (you'll need to join "launchpad.net/~ubuntu-etherpad" team first) ## ||User||Time zone||Quantity of managed bugs||List of bugs|| - ||[[https://launchpad.net/~es20490446e|es20490446e]]||+1||0||[[http://pad.ubuntu.com/ZxEgHwUrCC|List]]|| + ||[[https://launchpad.net/~es20490446e|es20490446e]]||+1||30||[[http://pad.ubuntu.com/ZxEgHwUrCC|List]]|| ||[[https://launchpad.net/~chilicuil|chilicuil]]||-6||0||[[http://pad.ubuntu.com/dPR8PO9BPx|List]]|| From noreply at ubuntu.com Sat Feb 8 19:54:11 2014 From: noreply at ubuntu.com (Ubuntu Wiki) Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 19:54:11 -0000 Subject: =?utf-8?q?New_attachment_added_to_page_Bugs/Ubuntu_Bug_Week_on_Ubuntu_Wik?= =?utf-8?q?i?= Message-ID: <20140208195411.13131.76336@mangaba.canonical.com> Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page "Bugs/Ubuntu Bug Week" for change notification. An attachment has been added to that page by es20490446e. Following detailed information is available: Attachment name: Bugs importances.png Attachment size: 42845 Attachment link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=Bugs+importances.png Page link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week From noreply at ubuntu.com Sat Feb 8 19:55:05 2014 From: noreply at ubuntu.com (Ubuntu Wiki) Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 19:55:05 -0000 Subject: =?utf-8?q?New_attachment_added_to_page_Bugs/Ubuntu_Bug_Week_on_Ubuntu_Wik?= =?utf-8?q?i?= Message-ID: <20140208195505.13131.53525@mangaba.canonical.com> Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page "Bugs/Ubuntu Bug Week" for change notification. An attachment has been added to that page by es20490446e. Following detailed information is available: Attachment name: Papercuts fixing.png Attachment size: 28582 Attachment link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=Papercuts+fixing.png Page link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week From noreply at ubuntu.com Sat Feb 8 19:55:45 2014 From: noreply at ubuntu.com (Ubuntu Wiki) Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 19:55:45 -0000 Subject: =?utf-8?q?New_attachment_added_to_page_Bugs/Ubuntu_Bug_Week_on_Ubuntu_Wik?= =?utf-8?q?i?= Message-ID: <20140208195545.13248.26045@mangaba.canonical.com> Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page "Bugs/Ubuntu Bug Week" for change notification. An attachment has been added to that page by es20490446e. Following detailed information is available: Attachment name: Bugs confirmation.png Attachment size: 31361 Attachment link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=Bugs+confirmation.png Page link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week From noreply at ubuntu.com Sun Feb 9 00:59:12 2014 From: noreply at ubuntu.com (Ubuntu Wiki) Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2014 00:59:12 -0000 Subject: =?utf-8?q?New_attachment_added_to_page_Bugs/Ubuntu_Bug_Week_on_Ubuntu_Wik?= =?utf-8?q?i?= Message-ID: <20140209005912.16946.37175@mangaba.canonical.com> Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page "Bugs/Ubuntu Bug Week" for change notification. An attachment has been added to that page by es20490446e. Following detailed information is available: Attachment name: Papercuts fixing.png Attachment size: 28779 Attachment link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=Papercuts+fixing.png Page link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week From noreply at ubuntu.com Sun Feb 9 01:00:42 2014 From: noreply at ubuntu.com (Ubuntu Wiki) Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2014 01:00:42 -0000 Subject: =?utf-8?q?New_attachment_added_to_page_Bugs/Ubuntu_Bug_Week_on_Ubuntu_Wik?= =?utf-8?q?i?= Message-ID: <20140209010042.19106.29296@mangaba.canonical.com> Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page "Bugs/Ubuntu Bug Week" for change notification. An attachment has been added to that page by es20490446e. Following detailed information is available: Attachment name: Bugs confirmation.png Attachment size: 31526 Attachment link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=Bugs+confirmation.png Page link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week From noreply at ubuntu.com Sun Feb 9 13:07:32 2014 From: noreply at ubuntu.com (Ubuntu Wiki) Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2014 13:07:32 -0000 Subject: =?utf-8?q?New_attachment_added_to_page_Bugs/Ubuntu_Bug_Week_on_Ubuntu_Wik?= =?utf-8?q?i?= Message-ID: <20140209130732.8597.73275@mangaba.canonical.com> Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page "Bugs/Ubuntu Bug Week" for change notification. An attachment has been added to that page by es20490446e. Following detailed information is available: Attachment name: Papercuts fixing.png Attachment size: 28848 Attachment link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=Papercuts+fixing.png Page link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week From noreply at ubuntu.com Sun Feb 9 13:09:13 2014 From: noreply at ubuntu.com (Ubuntu Wiki) Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2014 13:09:13 -0000 Subject: =?utf-8?q?New_attachment_added_to_page_Bugs/Ubuntu_Bug_Week_on_Ubuntu_Wik?= =?utf-8?q?i?= Message-ID: <20140209130913.8579.42929@mangaba.canonical.com> Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page "Bugs/Ubuntu Bug Week" for change notification. An attachment has been added to that page by es20490446e. Following detailed information is available: Attachment name: Bugs confirmation.png Attachment size: 31766 Attachment link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=Bugs+confirmation.png Page link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week From noreply at ubuntu.com Sun Feb 9 13:08:00 2014 From: noreply at ubuntu.com (Ubuntu Wiki) Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2014 13:08:00 -0000 Subject: =?utf-8?q?New_attachment_added_to_page_Bugs/Ubuntu_Bug_Week_on_Ubuntu_Wik?= =?utf-8?q?i?= Message-ID: <20140209130800.8462.87537@mangaba.canonical.com> Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page "Bugs/Ubuntu Bug Week" for change notification. An attachment has been added to that page by es20490446e. Following detailed information is available: Attachment name: Bugs importances.png Attachment size: 38171 Attachment link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=Bugs+importances.png Page link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week From noreply at ubuntu.com Sun Feb 9 17:44:15 2014 From: noreply at ubuntu.com (Ubuntu Wiki) Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2014 17:44:15 -0000 Subject: =?utf-8?q?New_attachment_added_to_page_Bugs/Ubuntu_Bug_Week_on_Ubuntu_Wik?= =?utf-8?q?i?= Message-ID: <20140209174415.8175.62314@mangaba.canonical.com> Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page "Bugs/Ubuntu Bug Week" for change notification. An attachment has been added to that page by es20490446e. Following detailed information is available: Attachment name: Bugs importances.png Attachment size: 38381 Attachment link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=Bugs+importances.png Page link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week From noreply at ubuntu.com Sun Feb 9 17:45:04 2014 From: noreply at ubuntu.com (Ubuntu Wiki) Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2014 17:45:04 -0000 Subject: =?utf-8?q?New_attachment_added_to_page_Bugs/Ubuntu_Bug_Week_on_Ubuntu_Wik?= =?utf-8?q?i?= Message-ID: <20140209174504.8070.37081@mangaba.canonical.com> Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page "Bugs/Ubuntu Bug Week" for change notification. An attachment has been added to that page by es20490446e. Following detailed information is available: Attachment name: Papercuts fixing.png Attachment size: 28901 Attachment link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=Papercuts+fixing.png Page link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week From noreply at ubuntu.com Sun Feb 9 11:16:06 2014 From: noreply at ubuntu.com (Ubuntu Wiki) Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2014 11:16:06 -0000 Subject: =?utf-8?q?=5BUbuntu_Wiki=5D_Update_of_=22Bugs/Ubuntu_Bug_Week/Set_bug_imp?= =?utf-8?q?ortances_contributors=22_by_chilicuil?= Message-ID: <20140209111606.26145.42814@mangaba.canonical.com> Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Ubuntu Wiki" for change notification. The "Bugs/Ubuntu Bug Week/Set bug importances contributors" page has been changed by chilicuil: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week/Set%20bug%20importances%20contributors?action=diff&rev1=7&rev2=8 ||User||Time zone||Quantity of managed bugs||List of bugs|| ||[[https://launchpad.net/~es20490446e|es20490446e]]||+1||42||[[http://pad.ubuntu.com/ZxEgHwUrCC|List]]|| - ||[[https://launchpad.net/~chilicuil|chilicuil]]||-6||0||[[http://pad.ubuntu.com/dPR8PO9BPx|List]]|| + ||[[https://launchpad.net/~chilicuil|chilicuil]]||-6||28||[[http://pad.ubuntu.com/dPR8PO9BPx|List]]|| From noreply at ubuntu.com Sun Feb 9 17:46:41 2014 From: noreply at ubuntu.com (Ubuntu Wiki) Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2014 17:46:41 -0000 Subject: =?utf-8?q?New_attachment_added_to_page_Bugs/Ubuntu_Bug_Week_on_Ubuntu_Wik?= =?utf-8?q?i?= Message-ID: <20140209174641.8187.43460@mangaba.canonical.com> Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page "Bugs/Ubuntu Bug Week" for change notification. An attachment has been added to that page by es20490446e. Following detailed information is available: Attachment name: Bugs confirmation.png Attachment size: 31843 Attachment link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=Bugs+confirmation.png Page link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week From es20490446e at gmail.com Tue Feb 11 20:34:29 2014 From: es20490446e at gmail.com (Alberto Salvia Novella) Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 21:34:29 +0100 Subject: Ubuntu Bug Week Announcement In-Reply-To: <52F8CCA8.1070107@canonical.com> References: <52EE4E5A.8030101@gmail.com> <52F393C7.7080808@gmail.com> <52F3BE60.8010005@gmail.com> <52F440D0.4090803@gmail.com> <52F44966.8000807@gmail.com> <52F8CCA8.1070107@canonical.com> Message-ID: <52FA8955.8010903@gmail.com> When saying Trusty is the most *stable release* I took into consideration it is in alpha stage, so Trusty is the most stable of all releases in alpha stage. On the other hand, the Ubuntu *Bug Week* has been quite unsuccessful. I thought in the worst scenario, because launching it so soon, whe will be at least four people participating; but we just where two. On the other hand, over a hundred bugs; so it wasn't that bad, *thanks* to Javier P.L. for being so supportive. Because of this, I want to ask people some *questions*; so next time we do better. Please tell me the following, although the possible answer doesn't seem relevant; so we can figure out what has being missed in the event: * *Why* you choose not to participate? * *What* will make you to participate in an event like this? Thank you El 10/02/14 13:57, Matthew Paul Thomas escribió: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi Alberto > > Alberto Salvia Novella wrote on 07/02/14 02:48: >> ... >> >> As said >> by Joel >> Spolsky, *good software* usually takes 10 years to become well >> made. And this appears the case for Ubuntu 14.04; the most stable >> release of all time, as it can be seen in its Error Tracker >> . >> >> ... > Unfortunately, the error tracker currently shows that Trusty (the > orange line) is the *least* stable version of Ubuntu yet. The most > stable release so far was 13.04 (the purple line). > > I guess you misunderstood this because the Y axis on the graph is > unlabelled, which is itself a bug! > > Unfortunately we can't tell whether Trusty is better or worse than > other releases at this point of the release cycle, because data from > before last July is on an old database server and not yet migrated to > the current tracker. > > I hope the Bug Weekend was a success. Perhaps for future Bug Days, you > could give more advance notice that they're happening. > > Cheers > - -- > mpt > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ > > iEYEARECAAYFAlL4zKgACgkQ6PUxNfU6ecqNkQCgxNl93M0y6END0YHs44NOfA1V > 30MAoImeTajjj2Ih792/u5lAgGDoUk9+ > =e5mV > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From fitoschido at ubuntu.com Tue Feb 11 21:21:36 2014 From: fitoschido at ubuntu.com (Adolfo Jayme Barrientos) Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 15:21:36 -0600 Subject: [Papercuts-ninja] Ubuntu Bug Week Announcement In-Reply-To: <52FA8955.8010903@gmail.com> References: <52EE4E5A.8030101@gmail.com> <52F393C7.7080808@gmail.com> <52F3BE60.8010005@gmail.com> <52F440D0.4090803@gmail.com> <52F44966.8000807@gmail.com> <52F8CCA8.1070107@canonical.com> <52FA8955.8010903@gmail.com> Message-ID: On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote: > On the other hand, the Ubuntu Bug Week has been quite unsuccessful. I > thought in the worst scenario, because launching it so soon, whe will be at > least four people participating; but we just where two. [...] > > Why you choose not to participate? > What will make you to participate in an event like this? Well, for me it just coincided with a busy schedule… For the next time we need to advertise this on Planet Ubuntu, there are some blogs that pick up event news from there, that way there’ll be more participation. From envygeeks at gmail.com Tue Feb 11 20:43:38 2014 From: envygeeks at gmail.com (Jordon Bedwell) Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 14:43:38 -0600 Subject: [Launchpad-users] Ubuntu Bug Week Announcement In-Reply-To: <52FA8955.8010903@gmail.com> References: <52EE4E5A.8030101@gmail.com> <52F393C7.7080808@gmail.com> <52F3BE60.8010005@gmail.com> <52F440D0.4090803@gmail.com> <52F44966.8000807@gmail.com> <52F8CCA8.1070107@canonical.com> <52FA8955.8010903@gmail.com> Message-ID: On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote: > When saying Trusty is the most stable release I took into consideration it > is in alpha stage, so Trusty is the most stable of all releases in alpha > stage. > > On the other hand, the Ubuntu Bug Week has been quite unsuccessful. I > thought in the worst scenario, because launching it so soon, whe will be at > least four people participating; but we just where two. On the other hand, > over a hundred bugs; so it wasn't that bad, thanks to Javier P.L. for being > so supportive. > > Because of this, I want to ask people some questions; so next time we do > better. Please tell me the following, although the possible answer doesn't > seem relevant; so we can figure out what has being missed in the event: > > Why you choose not to participate? I didn't even notice it was happening. > What will make you to participate in an event like this? Knowing it's happening. From jack at torios.org Tue Feb 11 20:45:29 2014 From: jack at torios.org (Jack Ramsay) Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 14:45:29 -0600 Subject: [Launchpad-users] Ubuntu Bug Week Announcement In-Reply-To: <52FA8955.8010903@gmail.com> References: <52EE4E5A.8030101@gmail.com> <52F393C7.7080808@gmail.com> <52F3BE60.8010005@gmail.com> <52F440D0.4090803@gmail.com> <52F44966.8000807@gmail.com> <52F8CCA8.1070107@canonical.com> <52FA8955.8010903@gmail.com> Message-ID: <52FA8BE9.5070204@torios.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 We should have had planned this further in advance to where people could have planned to participate. The two day or less notice was not good for people. On 02/11/2014 02:34 PM, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote: > When saying Trusty is the most *stable release* I took into > consideration it is in alpha stage, so Trusty is the most stable of > all releases in alpha stage. > > On the other hand, the Ubuntu *Bug Week* has been quite > unsuccessful. I thought in the worst scenario, because launching it > so soon, whe will be at least four people participating; but we > just where two. On the other hand, over a hundred bugs; so it > wasn't that bad, *thanks* to Javier P.L. > for being so supportive. > > Because of this, I want to ask people some *questions*; so next > time we do better. Please tell me the following, although the > possible answer doesn't seem relevant; so we can figure out what > has being missed in the event: > > * *Why* you choose not to participate? * *What* will make you to > participate in an event like this? > > Thank you > > > El 10/02/14 13:57, Matthew Paul Thomas escribió: Hi Alberto > > Alberto Salvia Novella wrote on 07/02/14 02:48: >>>> ... >>>> >>>> As said >>>> >>>> by Joel Spolsky, *good software* usually takes 10 years to >>>> become well made. And this appears the case for Ubuntu 14.04; >>>> the most stable release of all time, as it can be seen in its >>>> Error Tracker . >>>> >>>> ... > Unfortunately, the error tracker currently shows that Trusty (the > orange line) is the *least* stable version of Ubuntu yet. The most > stable release so far was 13.04 (the purple line). > > I guess you misunderstood this because the Y axis on the graph is > unlabelled, which is itself a bug! > > > Unfortunately we can't tell whether Trusty is better or worse than > other releases at this point of the release cycle, because data > from before last July is on an old database server and not yet > migrated to the current tracker. > > I hope the Bug Weekend was a success. Perhaps for future Bug Days, > you could give more advance notice that they're happening. > > Cheers -- mpt > > > > > _______________________________________________ Mailing list: > https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-users Post to : > launchpad-users at lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : > https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-users More help : > https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJS+ovpAAoJEMV5yRrlZuagNLQH/iJ8+mFDezs8MndRqRNQnh8a VI9PWXbxEsoSaaduhngxZk9jrwZxT2F5XBH33dzWNUtZgp4gs88sHamkcrDdoU0p NmM0IAkFoG+IGagsF/70jNsXuABbDAMqekz4sVOe3N+SQZNIkR/6ucqnCxU+e4j3 ZLQ4LMJR6bOZOode8cz9Ire7Z8fuew/ohfY77L8kzHawsMEAkxbIyEHb3R6CWKr4 OGyDKNVq4/37rSWMqhhKhYFCzqUhtlGCjelZUnzA2uymkFzad3CAJqIIeWH0g/Zc 0biEpndBmMoTIxD/Rg8tGtVJjvHZ2hi0UvKu6fXHiaSaBTI5pcCPUasyi3vqQlE= =Mw4Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From ubuntu.barry at gmail.com Tue Feb 11 20:54:30 2014 From: ubuntu.barry at gmail.com (Barry Drake) Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 20:54:30 +0000 Subject: Ubuntu Bug Week Announcement In-Reply-To: <52FA8955.8010903@gmail.com> References: <52EE4E5A.8030101@gmail.com> <52F393C7.7080808@gmail.com> <52F3BE60.8010005@gmail.com> <52F440D0.4090803@gmail.com> <52F44966.8000807@gmail.com> <52F8CCA8.1070107@canonical.com> <52FA8955.8010903@gmail.com> Message-ID: <52FA8E06.7090805@gmail.com> On 11/02/14 20:34, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote: > *Why* you choose not to participate?* What* will make you to > participate in an event like this? > > I would like to participate if I thought I could do anything useful. Maybe you could point me to a wiki detailing the process, and the skills I would expect to have and I'll gladly participate if my skills allow. Regards, Barry Drake From adam at disc0tech.com Tue Feb 11 22:09:23 2014 From: adam at disc0tech.com (Adam L Smith) Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 22:09:23 +0000 Subject: Ubuntu Bug Week Announcement In-Reply-To: <52FA8955.8010903@gmail.com> References: <52EE4E5A.8030101@gmail.com> <52F393C7.7080808@gmail.com> <52F3BE60.8010005@gmail.com> <52F440D0.4090803@gmail.com> <52F44966.8000807@gmail.com> <52F8CCA8.1070107@canonical.com> <52FA8955.8010903@gmail.com> Message-ID: <0000014422ff5663-69c4afba-549a-42bd-8472-4c9c5c06b871-000000@email.amazonses.com> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Hi Alberto As a tester: I spent a day working on ubuntu at the weekend, and had time to help with this, but I could not. This is because when I look at the bug lists, 99% cannot be progressed without serious development skills. Instead I worked on the autopilot tests for rhythmbox. By serious development skills I mean the ability to pick up crash dumps and action them. If there were bugs that could be reproduced with a lesser skills set - I couldn't find them If there are bug reports that require only high level, or general OS knowledge to progress - please point me at the list! Thanks Adam On 11 February 2014 20:34:29 GMT+00:00, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote: >When saying Trusty is the most *stable release* I took into >consideration it is in alpha stage, so Trusty is the most stable of all > >releases in alpha stage. > >On the other hand, the Ubuntu *Bug Week* has been quite unsuccessful. I > >thought in the worst scenario, because launching it so soon, whe will >be >at least four people participating; but we just where two. On the other > >hand, over a hundred bugs; so it wasn't that bad, *thanks* to Javier >P.L. for being so supportive. > >Because of this, I want to ask people some *questions*; so next time we > >do better. Please tell me the following, although the possible answer >doesn't seem relevant; so we can figure out what has being missed in >the >event: > > * *Why* you choose not to participate? > * *What* will make you to participate in an event like this? > >Thank you > > >El 10/02/14 13:57, Matthew Paul Thomas escribió: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Hi Alberto >> >> Alberto Salvia Novella wrote on 07/02/14 02:48: >>> ... >>> >>> As said >>> by Joel >>> Spolsky, *good software* usually takes 10 years to become well >>> made. And this appears the case for Ubuntu 14.04; the most stable >>> release of all time, as it can be seen in its Error Tracker >>> . >>> >>> ... >> Unfortunately, the error tracker currently shows that Trusty (the >> orange line) is the *least* stable version of Ubuntu yet. The most >> stable release so far was 13.04 (the purple line). >> >> I guess you misunderstood this because the Y axis on the graph is >> unlabelled, which is itself a bug! > >> >> Unfortunately we can't tell whether Trusty is better or worse than >> other releases at this point of the release cycle, because data from >> before last July is on an old database server and not yet migrated to >> the current tracker. >> >> I hope the Bug Weekend was a success. Perhaps for future Bug Days, >you >> could give more advance notice that they're happening. >> >> Cheers >> - -- >> mpt >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >> Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) >> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ >> >> iEYEARECAAYFAlL4zKgACgkQ6PUxNfU6ecqNkQCgxNl93M0y6END0YHs44NOfA1V >> 30MAoImeTajjj2Ih792/u5lAgGDoUk9+ >> =e5mV >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >-- >Ubuntu-quality mailing list >Ubuntu-quality at lists.ubuntu.com >Modify settings or unsubscribe at: >https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality - -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: APG v1.0.9 iQI8BAEBCAAmBQJS+p+JHxxkaXNjMHRlY2ggPGFkYW1AZGlzYzB0ZWNoLmNvbT4A CgkQveW9bcQ9QGzw9A//QgFRNPv+v+Qr99txBt01YDVpyu5d6zBUlRfCLYKut7Ev zaPbieEl6nJ1mKNmGpiziYLj597dPwk/wqjwgDTspzmjkLv8KqIjhn10TtglHLt4 K/A9KTBIF5WR3c0DMmqHdSc4c1erOTkbTZVpStMpZH0oAmMvRH70j6KIO7HPM6nF cjYursmsbSJxBRQoGY+K1GxIkfRFSm2I50WhWDYBcQ9cED0uZLt+n1hrA3ftiwvw 47XP17yZwJ0wVhFFC2k9LZdM5qRRLITrNCsXo/M+9vcxCPynG5KcG/sONHHVoyBM suOGLBVTdvanmWy/2iE3rVp3kdvlLTDIXRud/rEVUWLzRUjXdrn397UgaimXvl1E ymmDUyxwyfdGFVzTt3lYcEmhOgekvs4EPRqpKlNY48gfQQLLI/Q2+aVjV0FpTrJf k1AM8Bk98bXWOR2oa89Z8gTOgso53ay0A0IGQtIMGDwdyBv0bDjBqFFnlw/RRn/V hFcZcpym72ajHLfw+f7bEIJ2GGbxqjOuRcfu8nnTXtMkPm1jT++xSKyaevxMPncr mprrLQPdNH82aTs1zd1ETn8br8KBPz6G4WJMrNFmfKjONzoIW4IzEwF4RenSTKvQ COlIY52Ul2QmS7C4b61TyvJHp/0q7zz9fVOEs8C22AKuf3Dvi93a3oCnfIygW/g= =IgK4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From gunnarhj at ubuntu.com Tue Feb 11 21:31:42 2014 From: gunnarhj at ubuntu.com (Gunnar Hjalmarsson) Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 22:31:42 +0100 Subject: [Ubuntu-bugcontrol] Ubuntu Bug Week Announcement In-Reply-To: <52FA8955.8010903@gmail.com> References: <52EE4E5A.8030101@gmail.com> <52F393C7.7080808@gmail.com> <52F3BE60.8010005@gmail.com> <52F440D0.4090803@gmail.com> <52F44966.8000807@gmail.com> <52F8CCA8.1070107@canonical.com> <52FA8955.8010903@gmail.com> Message-ID: <52FA96BE.6080304@ubuntu.com> Hi Alberto, On 2014-02-11 21:34, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote: > Please tell me the following, although the possible answer doesn't > seem relevant; so we can figure out what has being missed in the event: > > * *Why* you choose not to participate? > * *What* will make you to participate in an event like this? As a subscriber to ubuntu-bugcontrol I was informed early in the morning on Friday, February 6 that the event would happen on Saturday and Sunday. Not much time to plan, I'd say... Also, the information was somewhat confusing. A week is usually 7 days, not 2 days. ;-) I would like to encourage you to make a new attempt, but then announce it well in advance of the event. Personally I worked with Ubuntu in other ways the whole weekend, but I don't think the reasons for my priorities are of general interest. -- Gunnar Hjalmarsson https://launchpad.net/~gunnarhj From es20490446e at gmail.com Wed Feb 12 17:31:29 2014 From: es20490446e at gmail.com (Alberto Salvia Novella) Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 18:31:29 +0100 Subject: Ubuntu Bug Week Announcement In-Reply-To: <0000014422ff5663-69c4afba-549a-42bd-8472-4c9c5c06b871-000000@email.amazonses.com> References: <52EE4E5A.8030101@gmail.com> <52F393C7.7080808@gmail.com> <52F3BE60.8010005@gmail.com> <52F440D0.4090803@gmail.com> <52F44966.8000807@gmail.com> <52F8CCA8.1070107@canonical.com> <52FA8955.8010903@gmail.com> <0000014422ff5663-69c4afba-549a-42bd-8472-4c9c5c06b871-000000@email.amazonses.com> Message-ID: <52FBAFF1.10001@gmail.com> This is what papercuts are! * Coder's task in the Ubuntu Bug Week. * Step 4 in the One Hundred Papercuts project's work-flow . El 11/02/14 23:09, Adam L Smith escribió: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > Hi Alberto > > As a tester: > > I spent a day working on ubuntu at the weekend, and had time to help with this, but I could not. This is because when I look at the bug lists, 99% cannot be progressed without serious development skills. Instead I worked on the autopilot tests for rhythmbox. > > By serious development skills I mean the ability to pick up crash dumps and action them. If there were bugs that could be reproduced with a lesser skills set - I couldn't find them > > If there are bug reports that require only high level, or general OS knowledge to progress - please point me at the list! > > Thanks > Adam > > > On 11 February 2014 20:34:29 GMT+00:00, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote: >> When saying Trusty is the most *stable release* I took into >> consideration it is in alpha stage, so Trusty is the most stable of all >> >> releases in alpha stage. >> >> On the other hand, the Ubuntu *Bug Week* has been quite unsuccessful. I >> >> thought in the worst scenario, because launching it so soon, whe will >> be >> at least four people participating; but we just where two. On the other >> >> hand, over a hundred bugs; so it wasn't that bad, *thanks* to Javier >> P.L. for being so supportive. >> >> Because of this, I want to ask people some *questions*; so next time we >> >> do better. Please tell me the following, although the possible answer >> doesn't seem relevant; so we can figure out what has being missed in >> the >> event: >> >> * *Why* you choose not to participate? >> * *What* will make you to participate in an event like this? >> >> Thank you >> >> >> El 10/02/14 13:57, Matthew Paul Thomas escribió: >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>> Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> Hi Alberto >>> >>> Alberto Salvia Novella wrote on 07/02/14 02:48: >>>> ... >>>> >>>> As said >>>> by Joel >>>> Spolsky, *good software* usually takes 10 years to become well >>>> made. And this appears the case for Ubuntu 14.04; the most stable >>>> release of all time, as it can be seen in its Error Tracker >>>> . >>>> >>>> ... >>> Unfortunately, the error tracker currently shows that Trusty (the >>> orange line) is the *least* stable version of Ubuntu yet. The most >>> stable release so far was 13.04 (the purple line). >>> >>> I guess you misunderstood this because the Y axis on the graph is >>> unlabelled, which is itself a bug! >> >>> Unfortunately we can't tell whether Trusty is better or worse than >>> other releases at this point of the release cycle, because data from >>> before last July is on an old database server and not yet migrated to >>> the current tracker. >>> >>> I hope the Bug Weekend was a success. Perhaps for future Bug Days, >> you >>> could give more advance notice that they're happening. >>> >>> Cheers >>> - -- >>> mpt >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) >>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ >>> >>> iEYEARECAAYFAlL4zKgACgkQ6PUxNfU6ecqNkQCgxNl93M0y6END0YHs44NOfA1V >>> 30MAoImeTajjj2Ih792/u5lAgGDoUk9+ >>> =e5mV >>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> -- >> Ubuntu-quality mailing list >> Ubuntu-quality at lists.ubuntu.com >> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality > - -- > Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: APG v1.0.9 > > iQI8BAEBCAAmBQJS+p+JHxxkaXNjMHRlY2ggPGFkYW1AZGlzYzB0ZWNoLmNvbT4A > CgkQveW9bcQ9QGzw9A//QgFRNPv+v+Qr99txBt01YDVpyu5d6zBUlRfCLYKut7Ev > zaPbieEl6nJ1mKNmGpiziYLj597dPwk/wqjwgDTspzmjkLv8KqIjhn10TtglHLt4 > K/A9KTBIF5WR3c0DMmqHdSc4c1erOTkbTZVpStMpZH0oAmMvRH70j6KIO7HPM6nF > cjYursmsbSJxBRQoGY+K1GxIkfRFSm2I50WhWDYBcQ9cED0uZLt+n1hrA3ftiwvw > 47XP17yZwJ0wVhFFC2k9LZdM5qRRLITrNCsXo/M+9vcxCPynG5KcG/sONHHVoyBM > suOGLBVTdvanmWy/2iE3rVp3kdvlLTDIXRud/rEVUWLzRUjXdrn397UgaimXvl1E > ymmDUyxwyfdGFVzTt3lYcEmhOgekvs4EPRqpKlNY48gfQQLLI/Q2+aVjV0FpTrJf > k1AM8Bk98bXWOR2oa89Z8gTOgso53ay0A0IGQtIMGDwdyBv0bDjBqFFnlw/RRn/V > hFcZcpym72ajHLfw+f7bEIJ2GGbxqjOuRcfu8nnTXtMkPm1jT++xSKyaevxMPncr > mprrLQPdNH82aTs1zd1ETn8br8KBPz6G4WJMrNFmfKjONzoIW4IzEwF4RenSTKvQ > COlIY52Ul2QmS7C4b61TyvJHp/0q7zz9fVOEs8C22AKuf3Dvi93a3oCnfIygW/g= > =IgK4 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From nicholas.skaggs at canonical.com Thu Feb 13 19:16:20 2014 From: nicholas.skaggs at canonical.com (Nicholas Skaggs) Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 14:16:20 -0500 Subject: [Launchpad-users] Ubuntu Bug Week Announcement In-Reply-To: References: <52EE4E5A.8030101@gmail.com> <52F393C7.7080808@gmail.com> <52F3BE60.8010005@gmail.com> <52F440D0.4090803@gmail.com> <52F44966.8000807@gmail.com> <52F8CCA8.1070107@canonical.com> <52FA8955.8010903@gmail.com> Message-ID: <52FD1A04.4000908@canonical.com> > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Alberto Salvia Novella > wrote: >> Why you choose not to participate? I was traveling back home from a Sprint sadly :-( So Alberto et la, let's plan the next event now. I think you've gotten some good feedback to make it a bit better next time around. Beta 1 is Feb 27th, and final beta is March 27th. I would plan with those dates in mind. Any thoughts on timeline? Nicholas From PhillW at PhillW.net Thu Feb 13 19:23:03 2014 From: PhillW at PhillW.net (Phill Whiteside) Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 19:23:03 +0000 Subject: [Launchpad-users] Ubuntu Bug Week Announcement In-Reply-To: <52FD1A04.4000908@canonical.com> References: <52EE4E5A.8030101@gmail.com> <52F393C7.7080808@gmail.com> <52F3BE60.8010005@gmail.com> <52F440D0.4090803@gmail.com> <52F44966.8000807@gmail.com> <52F8CCA8.1070107@canonical.com> <52FA8955.8010903@gmail.com> <52FD1A04.4000908@canonical.com> Message-ID: Hi, may I suggest the Fri / Sat / Sun of 7th, 8th and 9th March ? Also, as has been noted earlier.. please do liase with the papercut team for those of us who are not developers... there are bugs that still need confirming. It is a good chance to liase with the bug squad and get a "hug a bug" weekend. Just thinking out loud. Regards, Phill. On 13 February 2014 19:16, Nicholas Skaggs wrote: > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Alberto Salvia Novella < >> es20490446e at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Why you choose not to participate? >>> >> > I was traveling back home from a Sprint sadly :-( > > > So Alberto et la, let's plan the next event now. I think you've gotten > some good feedback to make it a bit better next time around. Beta 1 is Feb > 27th, and final beta is March 27th. I would plan with those dates in mind. > Any thoughts on timeline? > > > Nicholas > > > -- > Ubuntu-quality mailing list > Ubuntu-quality at lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/ > mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality > -- https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jpyper at gmail.com Thu Feb 13 22:54:24 2014 From: jpyper at gmail.com (John) Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 14:54:24 -0800 Subject: [Launchpad-users] Ubuntu Bug Week Announcement In-Reply-To: <52FA8955.8010903@gmail.com> References: <52EE4E5A.8030101@gmail.com> <52F393C7.7080808@gmail.com> <52F3BE60.8010005@gmail.com> <52F440D0.4090803@gmail.com> <52F44966.8000807@gmail.com> <52F8CCA8.1070107@canonical.com> <52FA8955.8010903@gmail.com> Message-ID: Hello all. My name is John. While I have been following behind the scenes stuff with Ubuntu since the beginning, it's very rare that I reply to anything on a mailing list. With that said, I have a thought or two. First, how does *2 days* constitute a week in reference to "Bug Week?" Last time I checked, a week was 7 days, or 5 days if you were to go the work/school days route. Second, why does bug smashing have to be limited to a "week?" Shouldn't bugs be getting smashed as soon as humanly possible, no matter when it is? Papercuts is a good forum, but "Bug Week" sounds like cheerleaders standing on the sidelines rooting for their team when they are down by 10 points with little time left on the clock. Something isn't right here. I will agree that the notification of the event gives little to no time for people to prepare. The organizers do use a public calendar, right? Better future planning is needed instead of scrambling at the last minute. I'm not a programmer, so fixing bugs is something I can't do myself. I do however, like to test new software, break it, give the developers back the little pieces and tell them how it broke so they can fix it. Reporting bugs can be fun, albeit a bit frustrating when the app doesn't work as advertised. People get discouraged when apps don't function as intended and move on to another distro or even back to Windows. I hope I haven't bitten off more than I can chew with my statements, but this is what I've seen here for years. -John BaD_CrC @ Freenode On Feb 11, 2014 12:35 PM, "Alberto Salvia Novella" wrote: > When saying Trusty is the most *stable release* I took into > consideration it is in alpha stage, so Trusty is the most stable of all > releases in alpha stage. > > On the other hand, the Ubuntu *Bug Week* has been quite unsuccessful. I > thought in the worst scenario, because launching it so soon, whe will be at > least four people participating; but we just where two. On the other hand, > over a hundred bugs; so it wasn't that bad, *thanks* to Javier P.L.for being so supportive. > > Because of this, I want to ask people some *questions*; so next time we > do better. Please tell me the following, although the possible answer > doesn't seem relevant; so we can figure out what has being missed in the > event: > > - *Why* you choose not to participate? > - *What* will make you to participate in an event like this? > > Thank you > > > El 10/02/14 13:57, Matthew Paul Thomas escribió: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi Alberto > > Alberto Salvia Novella wrote on 07/02/14 02:48: > > ... > > As said by Joel > Spolsky, *good software* usually takes 10 years to become well > made. And this appears the case for Ubuntu 14.04; the most stable > release of all time, as it can be seen in its Error Tracker . > > ... > > > Unfortunately, the error tracker currently shows that Trusty (the > orange line) is the *least* stable version of Ubuntu yet. The most > stable release so far was 13.04 (the purple line). > > I guess you misunderstood this because the Y axis on the graph is > unlabelled, which is itself a bug! > > Unfortunately we can't tell whether Trusty is better or worse than > other releases at this point of the release cycle, because data from > before last July is on an old database server and not yet migrated to > the current tracker. > > I hope the Bug Weekend was a success. Perhaps for future Bug Days, you > could give more advance notice that they're happening. > > Cheers > - -- > mpt > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ > > iEYEARECAAYFAlL4zKgACgkQ6PUxNfU6ecqNkQCgxNl93M0y6END0YHs44NOfA1V > 30MAoImeTajjj2Ih792/u5lAgGDoUk9+ > =e5mV > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-users > Post to : launchpad-users at lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-users > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From es20490446e at gmail.com Fri Feb 14 08:07:22 2014 From: es20490446e at gmail.com (Alberto Salvia Novella) Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 09:07:22 +0100 Subject: [Launchpad-users] Ubuntu Bug Week Announcement In-Reply-To: References: <52EE4E5A.8030101@gmail.com> <52F393C7.7080808@gmail.com> <52F3BE60.8010005@gmail.com> <52F440D0.4090803@gmail.com> <52F44966.8000807@gmail.com> <52F8CCA8.1070107@canonical.com> <52FA8955.8010903@gmail.com> <52FD1A04.4000908@canonical.com> Message-ID: <52FDCEBA.5080803@gmail.com> After reading all your comments, I think *the situation* that represents better what are you expecting for (correct me) is the following: * Making a *new event*. * Three *days*, from Friday 07-03 to Sunday 08-03. * *Naming* it "Ubuntu Bug Weekend". * Driven by *facts* not just promises. * Including a list of *papercuts* where it's possible to contribute without technical knowledge. * Making *video tutorials* about how to do individual tasks. * Properly *announcing* it following a schedule: o Two weeks in advance. o One week in advance. o Two days in advance. o Just when started. I also feel like *substituting* these proposals: * Setting *measurable goals*, because the used *visual management* is the substitute for this. It is generally recognized that measurable goals are better accomplished, but I find that performance at goals implicitly set visually usually surpass those written in a document: they're more motivating, less driven by hurry and more by constant improvement, and more adjusted to reality itself and not just to guesses. * Mentioning the *IRC* channel in every announcement; because this mean of communication requires constant attention, while *email* can be looked both constantly or from time to time at your own choice. So instead mentioning the Quality team mailing list. Where do you think they will be good *places**to announce* the event? Regards ? El 13/02/14 20:23, Phill Whiteside escribió: > Hi, > > may I suggest the Fri / Sat / Sun of 7th, 8th and 9th March ? Also, as > has been noted earlier.. please do liase with the papercut team for > those of us who are not developers... there are bugs that still need > confirming. It is a good chance to liase with the bug squad and get a > "hug a bug" weekend. > > Just thinking out loud. > > Regards, > > Phill. > > > On 13 February 2014 19:16, Nicholas Skaggs > > > wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Alberto Salvia Novella > > wrote: > > Why you choose not to participate? > > > I was traveling back home from a Sprint sadly :-( > > > So Alberto et la, let's plan the next event now. I think you've > gotten some good feedback to make it a bit better next time > around. Beta 1 is Feb 27th, and final beta is March 27th. I would > plan with those dates in mind. Any thoughts on timeline? > > > Nicholas > > > -- > Ubuntu-quality mailing list > Ubuntu-quality at lists.ubuntu.com > > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality > > > > > -- > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From es20490446e at gmail.com Fri Feb 14 09:39:06 2014 From: es20490446e at gmail.com (Alberto Salvia Novella) Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 10:39:06 +0100 Subject: [Launchpad-users] Ubuntu Bug Week Announcement In-Reply-To: References: <52EE4E5A.8030101@gmail.com> <52F393C7.7080808@gmail.com> <52F3BE60.8010005@gmail.com> <52F440D0.4090803@gmail.com> <52F44966.8000807@gmail.com> <52F8CCA8.1070107@canonical.com> <52FA8955.8010903@gmail.com> Message-ID: <52FDE43A.6040909@gmail.com> 🌊 *Ubuntu is not a wave, but a sea* I *think* what I'm going to say is anti-maketing, but also what for me seems real: Ubuntu is *not a distro* at this time, but a prototype of software development. The same as GNOME 3 has been in its early days, which I hated so much and now I like so hard. Usually I choose what *works now*, because working now is the only warrant it's actually been well done. On the other hand, in my opinion, no operating system is fully working today; because "working" means "working *for nearly everyone*". 📈*Decisions work**, and rapidly* So I chose Ubuntu because it's the only distro I see *decisions* are taken with criteria that actually works to put the operating system and libre software forward as a standard rapidly. Nearly every single thing that has been criticised to Ubuntu has through lately positive returns: * An *interface* that works across platforms, and which delivers maximum speed at work. * A *cloud* infrastructure that makes experience across devices very coherent, as these devices belonged to the same machine. * A massive *deployment* of the operating system. * Interest from the *gaming* industry in delivering titles to Linux. In fact, Steam and Source games work now without any errors at a stable performance in Saucy. * Interest in *GPUs* developers in greatly improving their drivers, both proprietary and libre. * The ability to *maintain* the computer by the user itself, without extra wasteful steps to configure it. 🐞*For bugs, a mini gun is being baked* And what is left and we're *working* on it right now, and I have notice, is the abilities to: * *Automatically* test and manage bugs. * *Smoke test* for bugs before launching a disk image. * Have a simple, lean and coherent *manual bug and quality management*; accessible to any kind of contributor. * *Launch* stable releases of Ubuntu every a while. So when this gets a little *more mature*, it seems the situation with bugs will be very different. And with mature I mean *months*. 🍻*Hype and a cup made a hiccup* I think at the end the real discussion is about that people somehow feels like being *manipulated* by social media and marketing. I have to say that, in my opinion, Ubuntu is being advertised as more polished than actually is; and this is where I think marketing went wrong and somehow dishonest. On the other hand, without excusing this point, I see the *intention* has been always good: making free software the standard, liberating computing, and showing that people can live working at it. Regards ☕ El 13/02/14 23:54, John escribió: > > Hello all. My name is John. > > While I have been following behind the scenes stuff with Ubuntu since > the beginning, it's very rare that I reply to anything on a mailing > list. With that said, I have a thought or two. > > First, how does *2 days* constitute a week in reference to "Bug Week?" > Last time I checked, a week was 7 days, or 5 days if you were to go > the work/school days route. > > Second, why does bug smashing have to be limited to a "week?" > Shouldn't bugs be getting smashed as soon as humanly possible, no > matter when it is? > > Papercuts is a good forum, but "Bug Week" sounds like cheerleaders > standing on the sidelines rooting for their team when they are down by > 10 points with little time left on the clock. > > Something isn't right here. I will agree that the notification of the > event gives little to no time for people to prepare. The organizers do > use a public calendar, right? Better future planning is needed instead > of scrambling at the last minute. > > I'm not a programmer, so fixing bugs is something I can't do myself. I > do however, like to test new software, break it, give the developers > back the little pieces and tell them how it broke so they can fix it. > > Reporting bugs can be fun, albeit a bit frustrating when the app > doesn't work as advertised. People get discouraged when apps don't > function as intended and move on to another distro or even back to > Windows. > > I hope I haven't bitten off more than I can chew with my statements, > but this is what I've seen here for years. > > -John > BaD_CrC @ Freenode > > On Feb 11, 2014 12:35 PM, "Alberto Salvia Novella" > > wrote: > > When saying Trusty is the most *stable release* I took into > consideration it is in alpha stage, so Trusty is the most stable > of all releases in alpha stage. > > On the other hand, the Ubuntu *Bug Week* has been quite > unsuccessful. I thought in the worst scenario, because launching > it so soon, whe will be at least four people participating; but we > just where two. On the other hand, over a hundred bugs; so it > wasn't that bad, *thanks* to Javier P.L. > for being so supportive. > > Because of this, I want to ask people some *questions*; so next > time we do better. Please tell me the following, although the > possible answer doesn't seem relevant; so we can figure out what > has being missed in the event: > > * *Why* you choose not to participate? > * *What* will make you to participate in an event like this? > > Thank you > > > El 10/02/14 13:57, Matthew Paul Thomas escribió: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Hi Alberto >> >> Alberto Salvia Novella wrote on 07/02/14 02:48: >>> ... >>> >>> As said >>> by Joel >>> Spolsky, *good software* usually takes 10 years to become well >>> made. And this appears the case for Ubuntu 14.04; the most stable >>> release of all time, as it can be seen in its Error Tracker >>> . >>> >>> ... >> Unfortunately, the error tracker currently shows that Trusty (the >> orange line) is the *least* stable version of Ubuntu yet. The most >> stable release so far was 13.04 (the purple line). >> >> I guess you misunderstood this because the Y axis on the graph is >> unlabelled, which is itself a bug! >> >> Unfortunately we can't tell whether Trusty is better or worse than >> other releases at this point of the release cycle, because data from >> before last July is on an old database server and not yet migrated to >> the current tracker. >> >> I hope the Bug Weekend was a success. Perhaps for future Bug Days, you >> could give more advance notice that they're happening. >> >> Cheers >> - -- >> mpt >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >> Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) >> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -http://www.enigmail.net/ >> >> iEYEARECAAYFAlL4zKgACgkQ6PUxNfU6ecqNkQCgxNl93M0y6END0YHs44NOfA1V >> 30MAoImeTajjj2Ih792/u5lAgGDoUk9+ >> =e5mV >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-users > > Post to : launchpad-users at lists.launchpad.net > > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-users > > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jordannh at fastmail.fm Fri Feb 14 15:37:21 2014 From: jordannh at fastmail.fm (Jordan H.) Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 07:37:21 -0800 Subject: [Launchpad-users] Ubuntu Bug Week Announcement In-Reply-To: <52FDCEBA.5080803@gmail.com> References: <52EE4E5A.8030101@gmail.com> <52F393C7.7080808@gmail.com> <52F3BE60.8010005@gmail.com> <52F440D0.4090803@gmail.com> <52F44966.8000807@gmail.com> <52F8CCA8.1070107@canonical.com> <52FA8955.8010903@gmail.com> <52FD1A04.4000908@canonical.com> <52FDCEBA.5080803@gmail.com> Message-ID: <52FE3831.2010801@fastmail.fm> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Alberto, It might even be good to schedule "sub-events" for beginners (or experts, too), such as days to get the development environment set up, register on Launchpad, etc. This last bug weekend I wanted to get involved and (foolishly) waited until the last minute to get VirtualBox set up with Trusty. I spent all my time setting up my development environment and wasn't able to participate in bug weekend. Great idea and initiative! Alberto Salvia Novella: > After reading all your comments, I think *the situation* that represents better what are you expecting for (correct me) is the following: > > * Making a *new event*. > * Three *days*, from Friday 07-03 to Sunday 08-03. > * *Naming* it "Ubuntu Bug Weekend". > * Driven by *facts* not just promises. > * Including a list of *papercuts* where it's possible to contribute > without technical knowledge. > * Making *video tutorials* about how to do individual tasks. > * Properly *announcing* it following a schedule: > o Two weeks in advance. > o One week in advance. > o Two days in advance. > o Just when started. > > > I also feel like *substituting* these proposals: > > * Setting *measurable goals*, because the used *visual management* is > the substitute for this. It is generally recognized that measurable > goals are better accomplished, but I find that performance at goals > implicitly set visually usually surpass those written in a document: > they're more motivating, less driven by hurry and more by constant > improvement, and more adjusted to reality itself and not just to > guesses. > * Mentioning the *IRC* channel in every announcement; because this > mean of communication requires constant attention, while *email* can > be looked both constantly or from time to time at your own choice. > So instead mentioning the Quality team mailing list. > > > Where do you think they will be good *places**to announce* the event? > > Regards ? > > > El 13/02/14 20:23, Phill Whiteside escribió: >> Hi, >> >> may I suggest the Fri / Sat / Sun of 7th, 8th and 9th March ? Also, as has been noted earlier.. please do liase with the papercut team for those of us who are not developers... there are bugs that still need confirming. It is a good chance to liase with the bug squad and get a "hug a bug" weekend. >> >> Just thinking out loud. >> >> Regards, >> >> Phill. >> >> >> On 13 February 2014 19:16, Nicholas Skaggs > wrote: >> >> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Alberto Salvia Novella >> > wrote: >> >> Why you choose not to participate? >> >> >> I was traveling back home from a Sprint sadly :-( >> >> >> So Alberto et la, let's plan the next event now. I think you've >> gotten some good feedback to make it a bit better next time >> around. Beta 1 is Feb 27th, and final beta is March 27th. I would >> plan with those dates in mind. Any thoughts on timeline? >> >> >> Nicholas >> >> >> -- Ubuntu-quality mailing list >> Ubuntu-quality at lists.ubuntu.com >> >> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality >> >> >> >> >> -- >> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw > > > > After reading all your comments, I think *the situation* that represents better what are you expecting for (correct me) is the following: > > * Making a *new event*. > * Three *days*, from Friday 07-03 to Sunday 08-03. > * *Naming* it "Ubuntu Bug Weekend". > * Driven by *facts* not just promises. > * Including a list of *papercuts* where it's possible to contribute without technical knowledge. > * Making *video tutorials* about how to do individual tasks. > * Properly *announcing* it following a schedule: > o Two weeks in advance. > o One week in advance. > o Two days in advance. > o Just when started. > > > I also feel like *substituting* these proposals: > > * Setting *measurable goals*, because the used *visual management* is the substitute for this. It is generally recognized that measurable goals are better accomplished, but I find that performance at goals implicitly set visually usually surpass those written in a document: they're more motivating, less driven by hurry and more by constant improvement, and more adjusted to reality itself and not just to guesses. > * Mentioning the *IRC* channel in every announcement; because this mean of communication requires constant attention, while *email* can be looked both constantly or from time to time at your own choice. So instead mentioning the Quality team mailing list. > > > Where do you think they will be good *places**to announce* the event? > > Regards ? > > > El 13/02/14 20:23, Phill Whiteside escribió: >> Hi, >> >> may I suggest the Fri / Sat / Sun of 7th, 8th and 9th March ? Also, as has been noted earlier.. please do liase with the papercut team for those of us who are not developers... there are bugs that still need confirming. It is a good chance to liase with the bug squad and get a "hug a bug" weekend. >> >> Just thinking out loud. >> >> Regards, >> >> Phill. >> >> >> On 13 February 2014 19:16, Nicholas Skaggs > wrote: >> >> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Alberto Salvia Novella > wrote: >> >> Why you choose not to participate? >> >> >> I was traveling back home from a Sprint sadly :-( >> >> >> So Alberto et la, let's plan the next event now. I think you've gotten some good feedback to make it a bit better next time around. Beta 1 is Feb 27th, and final beta is March 27th. I would plan with those dates in mind. Any thoughts on timeline? >> >> >> Nicholas >> >> >> -- >> Ubuntu-quality mailing list >> Ubuntu-quality at lists.ubuntu.com >> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality >> >> >> >> >> -- >> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJS/jglAAoJEOT99oqiSuRNCgUH/0L1VTShfpxK2PiS745KIu1x HMMZNRx75ih759RmUWIlgFf7gymA0aaSpie17FjxPpRtvHnbSMCQn76aeileiX/q ugpu64RcQOEHMZI+3PYxll3Fg3+zAT3HfLcbbDMwhcbem1jGUSGejkP5VJYPFHjr bmq9vtItXVHeG+hWvc58KUqhutgEKJTbWUIcKXIqPc44oRoL64n+CQ5hNMCw1QM3 VHA6IDzksm1DBYQHp+/CaDcZscSDZUlZ1RgcMoCt0LZhEC+iVGWsrh41INXdfOi9 TkdKwaQee4+DZVfalwVGej4OhnsNzBltLtBLFVs+U+mzdMtHRaKPREzDbb4/vQI= =HmU3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From lfaraone at ubuntu.com Sat Feb 15 00:23:06 2014 From: lfaraone at ubuntu.com (Luke Faraone) Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 19:23:06 -0500 Subject: [Ubuntu-bugcontrol] [Launchpad-users] Ubuntu Bug Week Announcement In-Reply-To: <52FDE43A.6040909@gmail.com> References: <52EE4E5A.8030101@gmail.com> <52F393C7.7080808@gmail.com> <52F3BE60.8010005@gmail.com> <52F440D0.4090803@gmail.com> <52F44966.8000807@gmail.com> <52F8CCA8.1070107@canonical.com> <52FA8955.8010903@gmail.com> <52FDE43A.6040909@gmail.com> Message-ID: Alberto, On 14 February 2014 04:39, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote: > I *think* what I'm going to say is anti-maketing, but also what for me > seems real: > > Ubuntu is *not a distro* at this time, but a prototype of software > development. > The same as GNOME 3 has been in its early days, which I hated so much and > now I like so hard. > > Usually I choose what *works now*, because working now is the only > warrant it's actually been well done. > On the other hand, in my opinion, no operating system is fully working > today; because "working" means "working *for nearly everyone*". > Please stop. CCing a dozen mailing lists, many of which are entirely off-topic, is considered rude. I've moved the most irrelevant lists to BCC in this reply. The use of emojii and complex formatting is also out of the norm for mailing list conduct. You created a new initiative, which is nice. However, you did so unilaterally and in a way that didn't make sense, as several people have stated. You're welcome to contribute to Ubuntu through bug triage and code contributions, but please try to discuss such an event before "running" it again. Regards, Luke Faraone https://launchpad.net/~lfaraone -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From es20490446e at gmail.com Sun Feb 16 13:28:03 2014 From: es20490446e at gmail.com (Alberto Salvia Novella) Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 14:28:03 +0100 Subject: Ubuntu Bug Week Announcement In-Reply-To: <3EB4335E-D238-4299-B810-DE8008604953@gmail.com> References: <52EE4E5A.8030101@gmail.com> <52F393C7.7080808@gmail.com> <52F3BE60.8010005@gmail.com> <52F440D0.4090803@gmail.com> <52F44966.8000807@gmail.com> <52F8CCA8.1070107@canonical.com> <52FA8955.8010903@gmail.com> <52FDE43A.6040909@gmail.com> <3EB4335E-D238-4299-B810-DE8008604953@gmail.com> Message-ID: <5300BCE3.5050807@gmail.com> * About *CCing* a dozen mailing lists: yes, just forget to remove them from discussion. * About the use of *emojii*: the emojii I use is Unicode, so they're also correctly represented in plain text (this is why I choose to do this way). In which email reader you're unable to see them? * About the use of *complex formatting*: I have review my messages in plain text, and I don't see them being less legible because using listing or bold typefaces. * About doing the event so *unilaterally*: It can be said I did it too fast but, because I told it a week in advance in the proper mailing list and discussed it in IRC, it is not unilaterally organized. El 15/02/14 19:36, John Kim escribió: > +1. Let’s take it much slower next time. > > John Kim > Student / Ubuntu 12.04 User > www.launchpad.net/~kotux > johnkim.ubuntu at gmail.com > > > > > > On Feb 14, 2014, at 16:23, Luke Faraone > wrote: > >> Alberto, >> >> On 14 February 2014 04:39, Alberto Salvia Novella >> > wrote: >> >> I *think* what I'm going to say is anti-maketing, but also what >> for me seems real: >> >> Ubuntu is *not a distro* at this time, but a prototype of >> software development. >> The same as GNOME 3 has been in its early days, which I hated so >> much and now I like so hard. >> >> Usually I choose what *works now*, because working now is the >> only warrant it's actually been well done. >> On the other hand, in my opinion, no operating system is fully >> working today; because "working" means "working *for nearly >> everyone*". >> >> >> >> Please stop. CCing a dozen mailing lists, many of which are entirely >> off-topic, is considered rude. I've moved the most irrelevant lists >> to BCC in this reply. The use of emojii and complex formatting is >> also out of the norm for mailing list conduct. >> >> You created a new initiative, which is nice. However, you did so >> unilaterally and in a way that didn't make sense, as several people >> have stated. >> >> You're welcome to contribute to Ubuntu through bug triage and code >> contributions, but please try to discuss such an event before >> "running" it again. >> >> Regards, >> >> Luke Faraone >> https://launchpad.net/~lfaraone >> -- >> Ubuntu-quality mailing list >> Ubuntu-quality at lists.ubuntu.com >> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ub.untu at btinternet.com Sun Feb 16 14:27:26 2014 From: ub.untu at btinternet.com (Elfy) Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 14:27:26 +0000 Subject: Ubuntu Bug Week Announcement In-Reply-To: <5300BCE3.5050807@gmail.com> References: <52EE4E5A.8030101@gmail.com> <52F393C7.7080808@gmail.com> <52F3BE60.8010005@gmail.com> <52F440D0.4090803@gmail.com> <52F44966.8000807@gmail.com> <52F8CCA8.1070107@canonical.com> <52FA8955.8010903@gmail.com> <52FDE43A.6040909@gmail.com> <3EB4335E-D238-4299-B810-DE8008604953@gmail.com> <5300BCE3.5050807@gmail.com> Message-ID: <5300CACE.9050301@btinternet.com> On 02/16/2014 01:28 PM, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote: > > * About *CCing* a dozen mailing lists: yes, just forget to remove > them from discussion. > * About the use of *emojii*: the emojii I use is Unicode, so they're > also correctly represented in plain text (this is why I choose to > do this way). In which email reader you're unable to see them? > Thunderbird. Regardless of which - a mailing list isn't really the place for them. > > * About the use of *complex formatting*: I have review my messages > in plain text, and I don't see them being less legible because > using listing or bold typefaces. > * About doing the event so *unilaterally*: It can be said I did it > too fast but, because I told it a week in advance in the proper > mailing list and discussed it in IRC, it is not unilaterally > organized. > > Elfy -- Ubuntu Forum Council Member Xubuntu QA Lead -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From teward at trekweb.org Sun Feb 16 14:37:28 2014 From: teward at trekweb.org (Thomas Ward) Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 09:37:28 -0500 Subject: Ubuntu Bug Week Announcement In-Reply-To: <5300CACE.9050301@btinternet.com> References: <52EE4E5A.8030101@gmail.com> <52F393C7.7080808@gmail.com> <52F3BE60.8010005@gmail.com> <52F440D0.4090803@gmail.com> <52F44966.8000807@gmail.com> <52F8CCA8.1070107@canonical.com> <52FA8955.8010903@gmail.com> <52FDE43A.6040909@gmail.com> <3EB4335E-D238-4299-B810-DE8008604953@gmail.com> <5300BCE3.5050807@gmail.com> <5300CACE.9050301@btinternet.com> Message-ID: > On Feb 16, 2014, at 9:27, Elfy wrote: > >> On 02/16/2014 01:28 PM, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote: >> About CCing a dozen mailing lists: yes, just forget to remove them from discussion. >> About the use of emojii: the emojii I use is Unicode, so they're also correctly represented in plain text (this is why I choose to do this way). In which email reader you're unable to see them? > > Thunderbird. > > Regardless of which - a mailing list isn't really the place for them. Agreed with Elfy. Mailing lists aren't the place for emoji. >> About the use of complex formatting: I have review my messages in plain text, and I don't see them being less legible because using listing or bold typefaces. I'd suggest that if you review your messages in plain text that you make sure your emails are being *sent* as plain text as well. The alternative is to just not use whatever you're using to apply emphasis to things. >> About doing the event so unilaterally: It can be said I did it too fast but, because I told it a week in advance in the proper mailing list and discussed it in IRC, it is not unilaterally organized. Not all of us IRC, Alberto. That's why many may think this is unilaterally organized. It's probably better to use just the mailing list for discussing organization of these events, or to link the relevant logs of discussion here, if the channels you used to discuss this are logged publicly. > > Elfy > -- > Ubuntu Forum Council Member > Xubuntu QA Lead ------ Thomas LP: ~teward -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From johnkim.ubuntu at gmail.com Sun Feb 16 06:16:41 2014 From: johnkim.ubuntu at gmail.com (John Kim) Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 22:16:41 -0800 Subject: Affects more than two projects In-Reply-To: <20140216061543.GA22086@sparrow> References: <20140216061543.GA22086@sparrow> Message-ID: For the subject, I meant "Affects two projects". My bad. On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 10:15 PM, john wrote: > Hello, > > My name is John Kim, and I've been involved in 5-a-day for a couple of > days now. I have a question. See Bug #1243428. Earlier today, the bug > report did not have a package set. I managed to set it, so that we see > "openshot (Ubuntu)" instead of "Ubuntu". > > The problem is I see "OpenShot Video Editor" included there, which links > the report to upstream. Is it ok to leave it there, or should it be > removed? I believe it is suffice to set the bug to a package, instead of > have both the package and the upstream marked as affected. > > Thanks. > > -- > John Kim (IRC: kotux) > Student / Ubuntu 12.04 User > www.launchpad.net/~kotux > > -- John Kim Student/Ubuntu 12.04 www.laucnhpad.net/~kotux johnkim.ubuntu at gmail.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From johnkim.ubuntu at gmail.com Sat Feb 15 18:36:36 2014 From: johnkim.ubuntu at gmail.com (John Kim) Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 10:36:36 -0800 Subject: [Ubuntu-bugcontrol] [Launchpad-users] Ubuntu Bug Week Announcement In-Reply-To: References: <52EE4E5A.8030101@gmail.com> <52F393C7.7080808@gmail.com> <52F3BE60.8010005@gmail.com> <52F440D0.4090803@gmail.com> <52F44966.8000807@gmail.com> <52F8CCA8.1070107@canonical.com> <52FA8955.8010903@gmail.com> <52FDE43A.6040909@gmail.com> Message-ID: <3EB4335E-D238-4299-B810-DE8008604953@gmail.com> +1. Let’s take it much slower next time. John Kim Student / Ubuntu 12.04 User www.launchpad.net/~kotux johnkim.ubuntu at gmail.com On Feb 14, 2014, at 16:23, Luke Faraone wrote: > Alberto, > > On 14 February 2014 04:39, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote: > I think what I'm going to say is anti-maketing, but also what for me seems real: > > Ubuntu is not a distro at this time, but a prototype of software development. > The same as GNOME 3 has been in its early days, which I hated so much and now I like so hard. > > Usually I choose what works now, because working now is the only warrant it's actually been well done. > On the other hand, in my opinion, no operating system is fully working today; because "working" means "working for nearly everyone". > > > Please stop. CCing a dozen mailing lists, many of which are entirely off-topic, is considered rude. I've moved the most irrelevant lists to BCC in this reply. The use of emojii and complex formatting is also out of the norm for mailing list conduct. > > You created a new initiative, which is nice. However, you did so unilaterally and in a way that didn't make sense, as several people have stated. > > You're welcome to contribute to Ubuntu through bug triage and code contributions, but please try to discuss such an event before "running" it again. > > Regards, > > Luke Faraone > https://launchpad.net/~lfaraone > -- > Ubuntu-quality mailing list > Ubuntu-quality at lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From es20490446e at gmail.com Sun Feb 16 20:26:03 2014 From: es20490446e at gmail.com (Alberto Salvia Novella) Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 21:26:03 +0100 Subject: Ubuntu Bug Week Announcement In-Reply-To: References: <52EE4E5A.8030101@gmail.com> <52F393C7.7080808@gmail.com> <52F3BE60.8010005@gmail.com> <52F440D0.4090803@gmail.com> <52F44966.8000807@gmail.com> <52F8CCA8.1070107@canonical.com> <52FA8955.8010903@gmail.com> <52FDE43A.6040909@gmail.com> <3EB4335E-D238-4299-B810-DE8008604953@gmail.com> <5300BCE3.5050807@gmail.com> <5300CACE.9050301@btinternet.com> Message-ID: <53011EDB.5010800@gmail.com> Memory retention.png Cognitive speed.png ? Discussion around "Bug Week" El 16/02/14 15:37, Thomas Ward wrote: > > > On Feb 16, 2014, at 9:27, Elfy > wrote: > >> On 02/16/2014 01:28 PM, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote: >>> >>> * About *CCing* a dozen mailing lists: yes, just forget to remove >>> them from discussion. >>> * About the use of *emojii*: the emojii I use is Unicode, so >>> they're also correctly represented in plain text (this is why I >>> choose to do this way). In which email reader you're unable to >>> see them? >>> >> >> Thunderbird. >> >> Regardless of which - a mailing list isn't really the place for them. > > Agreed with Elfy. Mailing lists aren't the place for emoji. >>> >>> * About the use of *complex formatting*: I have review my messages >>> in plain text, and I don't see them being less legible because >>> using listing or bold typefaces. >>> > I'd suggest that if you review your messages in plain text that you > make sure your emails are being *sent* as plain text as well. The > alternative is to just not use whatever you're using to apply emphasis > to things. >>> >>> * About doing the event so *unilaterally*: It can be said I did it >>> too fast but, because I told it a week in advance in the proper >>> mailing list and discussed it in IRC, it is not unilaterally >>> organized. >>> > Not all of us IRC, Alberto. That's why many may think this is > unilaterally organized. It's probably better to use just the mailing > list for discussing organization of these events, or to link the > relevant logs of discussion here, if the channels you used to discuss > this are logged publicly. >>> >>> * >>> >>> >>> >> >> Elfy >> -- >> Ubuntu Forum Council Member >> Xubuntu QA Lead > ------ > Thomas > LP: ~teward > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Memory retention.png Type: image/png Size: 25947 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Cognitive speed.png Type: image/png Size: 25166 bytes Desc: not available URL: From johnkim.ubuntu at gmail.com Sun Feb 16 06:15:43 2014 From: johnkim.ubuntu at gmail.com (john) Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 22:15:43 -0800 Subject: Affects more than two projects Message-ID: <20140216061543.GA22086@sparrow> Hello, My name is John Kim, and I've been involved in 5-a-day for a couple of days now. I have a question. See Bug #1243428. Earlier today, the bug report did not have a package set. I managed to set it, so that we see "openshot (Ubuntu)" instead of "Ubuntu". The problem is I see "OpenShot Video Editor" included there, which links the report to upstream. Is it ok to leave it there, or should it be removed? I believe it is suffice to set the bug to a package, instead of have both the package and the upstream marked as affected. Thanks. -- John Kim (IRC: kotux) Student / Ubuntu 12.04 User www.launchpad.net/~kotux From fitoschido at ubuntu.com Mon Feb 17 13:19:02 2014 From: fitoschido at ubuntu.com (Adolfo Jayme Barrientos) Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 07:19:02 -0600 Subject: Affects more than two projects In-Reply-To: <20140216061543.GA22086@sparrow> References: <20140216061543.GA22086@sparrow> Message-ID: On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 12:15 AM, john wrote: > The problem is I see "OpenShot Video Editor" included there, which links the report to upstream. Is it ok to leave it there, or should it be removed? I believe it is suffice to set the bug to a package, instead of have both the package and the upstream marked as affected. Leave it, upstream tracks bugs in Launchpad as well and it's up to the maintainers to leave them or remove them. If the bug was about an specific packaging issue, it'd be fine to have only the Ubuntu bug task. From johnkim.ubuntu at gmail.com Mon Feb 17 15:14:36 2014 From: johnkim.ubuntu at gmail.com (John Kim) Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 07:14:36 -0800 Subject: Affects more than two projects In-Reply-To: References: <20140216061543.GA22086@sparrow> Message-ID: <9DDA6412-CB34-42C1-A72E-80335FB3862B@gmail.com> Ok, thank you. John Kim (IRC: kotux) Student / Ubuntu 12.04 User www.launchpad.net/~kotux johnkim.ubuntu at gmail.com On Feb 17, 2014, at 5:19, Adolfo Jayme Barrientos wrote: > On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 12:15 AM, john wrote: >> The problem is I see "OpenShot Video Editor" included there, which links the report to upstream. Is it ok to leave it there, or should it be removed? I believe it is suffice to set the bug to a package, instead of have both the package and the upstream marked as affected. > > Leave it, upstream tracks bugs in Launchpad as well and it's up to the > maintainers to leave them or remove them. If the bug was about an > specific packaging issue, it'd be fine to have only the Ubuntu bug > task. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From johnkim.ubuntu at gmail.com Mon Feb 17 15:50:20 2014 From: johnkim.ubuntu at gmail.com (John Kim) Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 07:50:20 -0800 Subject: Determining package for LiveUSB session Message-ID: <9B5D12CC-5136-4282-935D-06DAE0393D56@gmail.com> Hello, What package should I file a bug against if it involves a LiveUSB session? Or am I supposed to file the bug against the package in question inside the LiveUSB? Consider this bug [1]. The package is probably language-selector-gnome. Thank you. [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1272301 John Kim (IRC: kotux) Student / Ubuntu 12.04 User www.launchpad.net/~kotux johnkim.ubuntu at gmail.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From noreply at ubuntu.com Mon Feb 17 15:28:17 2014 From: noreply at ubuntu.com (Ubuntu Wiki) Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 15:28:17 -0000 Subject: =?utf-8?q?=5BUbuntu_Wiki=5D_Update_of_=22Bugs/FindRightPackage=22_by_kotu?= =?utf-8?q?x?= Message-ID: <20140217152817.29278.34633@mangaba.canonical.com> Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Ubuntu Wiki" for change notification. The "Bugs/FindRightPackage" page has been changed by kotux: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/FindRightPackage?action=diff&rev1=126&rev2=127 Comment: Added "or above" for a few lines at "At Login Screen" subject If you encounter a bug at the login screen, the package is the display manager: - * In Ubuntu 11.10, it is `LightDM`. In previous versions of Ubuntu and Edubuntu it was `gdm`. + * In Ubuntu 11.10 or above, it is `LightDM`. In previous versions of Ubuntu and Edubuntu it was `gdm`. - * In Xubuntu 11.10, it is `LightDM`. In previous versions of Xubuntu it was `gdm`. + * In Xubuntu 11.10 or above, it is `LightDM`. In previous versions of Xubuntu it was `gdm`. * In Kubuntu it is `kdm`. * In Lubuntu it is `lxdm`. From es20490446e at gmail.com Tue Feb 18 12:29:32 2014 From: es20490446e at gmail.com (Alberto Salvia Novella) Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 13:29:32 +0100 Subject: Determining package for LiveUSB session In-Reply-To: <9B5D12CC-5136-4282-935D-06DAE0393D56@gmail.com> References: <9B5D12CC-5136-4282-935D-06DAE0393D56@gmail.com> Message-ID: <5303522C.6020704@gmail.com> If the bug will be also in the Ubuntu *installation itself* just after set-up, it should be filed against the package in question. There are special cases where the bug only involves the *live image *(for example, bug #658042 ). In this case, the affected package is livecd-rootfs . Regards ? El 17/02/14 16:50, John Kim escribió: > Hello, > > What package should I file a bug against if it involves a LiveUSB > session? Or am I supposed to file the bug against the package in > question inside the LiveUSB? > > Consider this bug [1]. The package is probably language-selector-gnome. > > Thank you. > > [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1272301 > > John Kim (IRC: kotux) > Student / Ubuntu 12.04 User > www.launchpad.net/~kotux > johnkim.ubuntu at gmail.com > > > > > > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From johnkim.ubuntu at gmail.com Wed Feb 19 14:32:36 2014 From: johnkim.ubuntu at gmail.com (John Kim) Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 06:32:36 -0800 Subject: Filing against the Linux kernel Message-ID: Hello bugsquad, When I’m trying to file a bug against the linux kernel, I follow the guidance of this page at the kernel section [1]. But the word linux brings up “too many results” on the package setting part. I don’t know if setting the project as Linux is correct. Furthermore, I try linux-source, but for this bug [2], Launchpad automatically switched to linux-meta. Is this correct, and does the FindRightPackage page need an update? Thanks. [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/FindRightPackage [2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-meta/+bug/1267264 John Kim (IRC: kotux) Student / Ubuntu 12.04 User www.launchpad.net/~kotux johnkim.ubuntu at gmail.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From johnkim.ubuntu at gmail.com Wed Feb 19 14:43:48 2014 From: johnkim.ubuntu at gmail.com (John Kim) Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 06:43:48 -0800 Subject: Filing against the Linux kernel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <5EBF75C2-1F48-4E2D-A5FE-336E72481170@gmail.com> It calls linux-meta as the source package, so I assume that is the case and the wiki page needs an update or something. John Kim (IRC: kotux) Student / Ubuntu 12.04 User www.launchpad.net/~kotux johnkim.ubuntu at gmail.com On Feb 19, 2014, at 6:32, John Kim wrote: > Hello bugsquad, > > When I’m trying to file a bug against the linux kernel, I follow the guidance of this page at the kernel section [1]. But the word linux brings up “too many results” on the package setting part. I don’t know if setting the project as Linux is correct. Furthermore, I try linux-source, but for this bug [2], Launchpad automatically switched to linux-meta. Is this correct, and does the FindRightPackage page need an update? > > Thanks. > > [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/FindRightPackage > [2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-meta/+bug/1267264 > > John Kim (IRC: kotux) > Student / Ubuntu 12.04 User > www.launchpad.net/~kotux > johnkim.ubuntu at gmail.com > > > > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From louis.bouchard at canonical.com Thu Feb 20 13:17:58 2014 From: louis.bouchard at canonical.com (Louis Bouchard) Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 14:17:58 +0100 Subject: Filing against the Linux kernel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <53060086.20803@canonical.com> Hi John, Le 20/02/2014 13:00, ubuntu-bugsquad-request at lists.ubuntu.com a écrit : > Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 06:32:36 -0800 > From: John Kim > To: ubuntu-bugsquad > Subject: Filing against the Linux kernel > Message-ID: > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" > > Hello bugsquad, > > When I?m trying to file a bug against the linux kernel, I follow the guidance of this page at the kernel section [1]. But the word linux brings up ?too many results? on the package setting part. I don?t know if setting the project as Linux is correct. Furthermore, I try linux-source, but for this bug [2], Launchpad automatically switched to linux-meta. Is this correct, and does the FindRightPackage page need an update? > > Thanks. > > [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/FindRightPackage > [2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-meta/+bug/1267264 > > John Kim (IRC: kotux) > Student / Ubuntu 12.04 User > www.launchpad.net/~kotux > johnkim.ubuntu at gmail.com > > You need to file the bug against the Linux project. Here is an example : https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/751689 HTH, ...Louis -- Louis Bouchard Software engineer, Cloud & Sustaining eng. Canonical Ltd Ubuntu support: http://canonical.com/support From brian at ubuntu.com Thu Feb 20 15:17:02 2014 From: brian at ubuntu.com (Brian Murray) Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 07:17:02 -0800 Subject: Filing against the Linux kernel In-Reply-To: <53060086.20803@canonical.com> References: <53060086.20803@canonical.com> Message-ID: <20140220151702.GY32440@murraytwins.com> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 02:17:58PM +0100, Louis Bouchard wrote: > Hi John, > > Le 20/02/2014 13:00, ubuntu-bugsquad-request at lists.ubuntu.com a écrit : > > > Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 06:32:36 -0800 > > From: John Kim > > To: ubuntu-bugsquad > > Subject: Filing against the Linux kernel > > Message-ID: > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" > > > > Hello bugsquad, > > > > When I?m trying to file a bug against the linux kernel, I follow the guidance of this page at the kernel section [1]. But the word linux brings up ?too many results? on the package setting part. I don?t know if setting the project as Linux is correct. Furthermore, I try linux-source, but for this bug [2], Launchpad automatically switched to linux-meta. Is this correct, and does the FindRightPackage page need an update? > > > > Thanks. > > > > [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/FindRightPackage > > [2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-meta/+bug/1267264 > > > > John Kim (IRC: kotux) > > Student / Ubuntu 12.04 User > > www.launchpad.net/~kotux > > johnkim.ubuntu at gmail.com > > > > > > You need to file the bug against the Linux project. Here is an example : > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/751689 To be pedantic this is the Linux package for the Ubuntu distribution not the Linux project in Launchpad. Launchpad can track bug tasks for both but this particular bug report does not. The url used shows that we are taking about a package, notice the: "/ubuntu/+source/linux/" -- Brian Murray Ubuntu Bug Master From johnkim.ubuntu at gmail.com Thu Feb 20 14:36:44 2014 From: johnkim.ubuntu at gmail.com (John Kim) Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 06:36:44 -0800 Subject: Filing against the Linux kernel In-Reply-To: <53060086.20803@canonical.com> References: <53060086.20803@canonical.com> Message-ID: <7C00EA54-F6D8-4A80-84B5-FCC59D79F031@gmail.com> Hi Louis, Thanks very much. I realized that filling against the linux package works after all. John Kim Ubuntu Contributor www.launchpad.net/~kotux johnkim.ubuntu at gmail.com On Feb 20, 2014, at 5:17, Louis Bouchard wrote: > Hi John, > > Le 20/02/2014 13:00, ubuntu-bugsquad-request at lists.ubuntu.com a écrit : > >> Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 06:32:36 -0800 >> From: John Kim >> To: ubuntu-bugsquad >> Subject: Filing against the Linux kernel >> Message-ID: >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" >> >> Hello bugsquad, >> >> When I?m trying to file a bug against the linux kernel, I follow the guidance of this page at the kernel section [1]. But the word linux brings up ?too many results? on the package setting part. I don?t know if setting the project as Linux is correct. Furthermore, I try linux-source, but for this bug [2], Launchpad automatically switched to linux-meta. Is this correct, and does the FindRightPackage page need an update? >> >> Thanks. >> >> [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/FindRightPackage >> [2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-meta/+bug/1267264 >> >> John Kim (IRC: kotux) >> Student / Ubuntu 12.04 User >> www.launchpad.net/~kotux >> johnkim.ubuntu at gmail.com >> >> > > You need to file the bug against the Linux project. Here is an example : > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/751689 > > HTH, > > ...Louis > > > -- > Louis Bouchard > Software engineer, Cloud & Sustaining eng. > Canonical Ltd > Ubuntu support: http://canonical.com/support From noreply at ubuntu.com Sun Feb 23 18:57:29 2014 From: noreply at ubuntu.com (Ubuntu Wiki) Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 18:57:29 -0000 Subject: =?utf-8?q?=5BUbuntu_Wiki=5D_Update_of_=22LibreOfficeBugWrangling=22_by_pe?= =?utf-8?q?nalvch?= Message-ID: <20140223185729.31052.85245@mangaba.canonical.com> Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Ubuntu Wiki" for change notification. The "LibreOfficeBugWrangling" page has been changed by penalvch: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/LibreOfficeBugWrangling?action=diff&rev1=22&rev2=23 Comment: Streamlined article: 1) RM'ed duplicate section. 2) Collected Debug/Trouble into Debug. 3) Misc. minor rewords. <> ||'''Contents'''<
><>|| - = How to File = + = How to file a bug = * Please do not report a LibreOffice bug without first reading this wiki article and performing all the relevant actions mentioned here. Failure to do so may delay your bug getting addressed as quickly as possible. * First, before filing a bug report, please make sure you install the full LibreOffice suite to avoid [[https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/desktop-q-libreoffice-split|package split collatoral damage]], by executing at a terminal: || {{{sudo apt-get -y install libreoffice}}}|| * Please file all your LibreOffice bugs by executing at the Terminal: <
> {{{ubuntu-bug }}} <
> <
> where is the specific package you found the problem in. For example, if you have a document import issue with Writer: <
> {{{ubuntu-bug libreoffice-writer}}} - == Bug Reporting Template == + == Bug reporting template == || 1) lsb_release -rd <
> <
> 2) apt-cache policy <
> <
> apt-show-versions -r libreoffice* <
> <
> 3) What is expected to happen in Writer is . <
> <
> 4) What happened instead is... <
> <
> I have the following extensions installed: lo-menubar... <
> <
> WORKAROUND: Perform the following steps:...|| /!\ Please note the above 1) and 2) are terminal commands to execute, and post the results of when initially filing your bug report. As well, you may need to install the package [[https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt-show-versions|apt-show-versions]]. * Please do not stack multiple issues into one bug. * Please do not complain about how long it takes to fix a bug, the severity of your bug is high so it should be fixed immediately, "I cannot believe it's not fixed...", etc. Especially, if you have not completed the relevant, below mentioned debugging procedures, let alone contributed code upstream. This type of behavior is unconstructive, irritating to others who read your E-Mail, and spammy. We all want to see every bug fixed as soon as possible! Naturally, bugs being fixed is limited to reproducibility and clarity of the bug report, the actual impact the bug has on the community, and available developer resources. + = Debugging = - = Debugging Procedure = - == Document Issues == + == Move ~/.config/libreoffice == + Try moving .libreoffice and ~/.config/libreoffice. If you installed any extensions, remove them and see if the problem is reproducible. Comment on the results of performing these techniques in your report. Please keep these directories around -- if moving the profile helps you, developers might be interested in it to find out what was wrong with it. + - === Bug importing a non-MS Office document === + == Bug importing a non-MS Office document == * If you are reporting about importing a non-MS Office document, please attach the document to the bug report before opening in LibreOffice or in any other program. As well, please post a screenshot of how it looks in LibreOffice with a specific description about how it should look. - === Bug exporting to MS Office === + == Bug exporting to MS Office == * If you are reporting about how a document looks different exporting to MS Office, please attach the document to the bug report immediately after saving via LibreOffice, but before opening in MS Office. As well, please post a screenshot of how it looks in LibreOffice and then how it shows in MS Office. - === Bug Importing from MS Office === + == Bug importing from MS Office == * If you are reporting about how a document looks importing from MS Office, please save the file in MS Office, then before opening in any other program, attach the document to the bug report. As well, please post a screenshot of how it looks in LibreOffice and then how it shows in MS Office. - === Bug Exporting to Adobe PDF === + == Bug exporting PDF to Adobe == * If you are reporting about how a document looks exporting to Adobe Reader, please attach the file to the bug report before and after exporting to PDF. As well, provide screenshots of how it looks in LibreOffice and Adobe Reader. - === Bug Importing PDF === + == Bug importing PDF == * If you are reporting about how a PDF document looks importing into Draw, please attach the file to the bug report before importing into Draw. As well, provide screenshots of how it looks in LibreOffice and Adobe Reader. - == Printing == + = Printing problems == * For issues printing from LibreOffice please report this against cups first via the Terminal: <
> {{{ubuntu-bug cups}}} <
> <
> It could end up being an issue with LibreOffice, but it's best to start with cups in order to rule it out. As well, please follow all steps noted in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingPrintingProblems . - == Crashes == - === LibreOffice Crashes but System Still Functional === + == LibreOffice crashes but system still functional == - * For instances when only LibreOffice crashes but you can still use the OS without hard rebooting, please report this via Apport and ensure you have all the LibreOffice debug symbols installed (libreoffice-dbg, uno-libs3-dbg, and ure-dbg). For more on this please see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Apport . As well, if this happened while a particular document was open or you were manipulating the document, please attach that document to the bug report with detailed, click-for-click steps on how to reproduce the crash. - * In the rare instance that after you followed the above, apport did not kick in, please provide a backtrace, valgrind, and strace following https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingProgramCrash . + * For instances when only LibreOffice crashes but you can still use the OS without hard rebooting: + * Please consult https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Apport to ensure Apport is enabled. + * Please make sure LibreOffice debug symbols are installed (libreoffice-dbg, uno-libs3-dbg, and ure-dbg). + * If this happened while a particular document was open or you were manipulating the document in a certain way, please attach that document to the bug report with detailed, click-for-click steps on how to reproduce the crash. - === The Whole System Hangs or Boots to the Login Screen === + == The Whole system hangs or boots to the login screen == - * For instances when you are using LibreOffice and either the system hangs requiring a hard reset or you are booted to the login screen, this is a bug in either xorg or the kernel. Please follow https://help.ubuntu.com/community/DebuggingSystemCrash . As well, if this happened while a particular document was open or you were manipulating the document, please attach that document to the bug report with detailed, click-for-click steps on how to reproduce the crash. + * For instances when you are using LibreOffice and either the system hangs requiring a hard reset or you are booted to the login screen, this is a bug in either xorg or the linux kernel. Please follow https://help.ubuntu.com/community/DebuggingSystemCrash . As well, if this happened while a particular document was open or you were manipulating the document, please attach that document to the bug report with detailed, click-for-click steps on how to reproduce the crash. + == Bibisecting regressions == - === Troubleshooting Techniques === - Try moving .libreoffice and ~/.config/libreoffice. If you installed any extensions, remove them and see if the problem is reproducible. Comment on the results of performing these techniques in your report. Please keep these directories around -- if moving the profile helps you, developers might be interested in it to find out what was wrong with it. - - == Regressions == * For regressions, it is helpful to perform a binary bisect ("bibisect") to narrow down which commit specifically caused the problem. For instructions please see http://sweetshark.livejournal.com/7683.html . - == Wishlists == - * For Wishlist reports, many of these are requests to implement a feature in LibreOffice found in MS Office. A broad but good rule of thumb is if you want LibreOffice to do something that MS Office does (MS Office compatibility expectation), please document how specifically MS Office does it, then how LibreOffice does not or does not do well that which you desire. Please keep in mind, pocket cases exist where LibreOffice intentionally does not do what MS Office does (ex. leap year implementation https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/456100). - - = Triaging LibreOffice Bugs = + = Triaging LibreOffice bugs = == Writer and Calc == * For bugs in Writer, it is helpful to check to see if the problem exists in AbiWord. For bugs in Calc, it is helpful to check to see if the problem exists in Gnumeric. Sometimes, AbiWord and Gnumeric give the bug reporter a usable workaround to the problem (and vice versa). If a workaround is found, feel free to document it in the report. As well, while not quite apples and oranges code wise, it gives LibreOffice developers code to base a patch on. - == Wishlist Reports == + == Wishlist reports == - * For Wishlist reports, they most likely should be marked Won't Fix Wishlist. This is due to how Ubuntu diverts very little from the LibreOffice upstream source release, and upstream's rapid maintenance cadence. <
> A Won't Fix Wishlist stock reply: + * For Wishlist reports, these typically are requests to implement a new feature in LibreOffice not currently supported. A broad but good rule of thumb is if you want LibreOffice to do something that MS Office does, as LibreOffice intends compatibility with MS Office, please document how specifically MS Office does it, then how LibreOffice does not or does not do well that which you desire. + * Please keep in mind, pocket cases exist where LibreOffice intentionally does not do what MS Office does (ex. leap year implementation https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/456100). + * For Wishlist reports, they would typically be marked Won't Fix Wishlist. This is due to how Ubuntu diverts very little from the LibreOffice upstream source release, and upstream's rapid maintenance cadence. <
> A [[https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Bug%20statuses|Won't Fix]] [[https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Bug%20importances|Wishlist]] stock reply: ||Thank you for reporting this and helping making Ubuntu better. Regarding this report:<
>- This is a clearcut upstream issue. You are welcome to send this to the developers of the software by following the instructions at http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/BugReport . If you have done so, please tell us the number of the upstream bug (or the link), so we can add a bugwatch that will inform us about its status.<
>- Marking LibreOffice Packaging and libreoffice (Ubuntu) => Won't Fix Wishlist. This does not mean the issue will not be cared about, but if it is cared about (even by Ubuntu/Canonical contributors), it is done upstream at LibreOffice.|| - == How to Forward Bugs Upstream == + == How to forward bugs Upstream == - * Once marked Triaged, a report may be filed upstream using the [[https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/bug/|LibreOffice Bug Submission Assistant]] <>. + * Once marked Triaged, a bug that is reproducible in the upstream release would want to be filed upstream using the [[https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/bug/|LibreOffice Bug Submission Assistant]] <>. * Once a remote bug watch has been added to a bug report, it is helpful to append [Upstream] to the beginning of the bug title. This helps in searching for bugs reports by title. Please do not append this unless a remote bug watch has been added to the report as this creates confusion on which bugs have been reported upstream and which have not. From noreply at ubuntu.com Mon Feb 24 12:06:35 2014 From: noreply at ubuntu.com (Ubuntu Wiki) Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 12:06:35 -0000 Subject: =?utf-8?q?New_attachment_added_to_page_Bugs/Ubuntu_Bug_Weekend/Header_on_?= =?utf-8?q?Ubuntu_Wiki?= Message-ID: <20140224120635.29375.71914@mangaba.canonical.com> Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page "Bugs/Ubuntu Bug Weekend/Header" for change notification. An attachment has been added to that page by es20490446e. Following detailed information is available: Attachment name: Ubuntu Bug Week Logo.png Attachment size: 43947 Attachment link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Weekend/Header?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=Ubuntu+Bug+Week+Logo.png Page link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Weekend/Header From noreply at ubuntu.com Mon Feb 24 12:07:22 2014 From: noreply at ubuntu.com (Ubuntu Wiki) Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 12:07:22 -0000 Subject: =?utf-8?q?New_attachment_added_to_page_Bugs/Ubuntu_Bug_Weekend/Header_on_?= =?utf-8?q?Ubuntu_Wiki?= Message-ID: <20140224120722.29467.96456@mangaba.canonical.com> Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page "Bugs/Ubuntu Bug Weekend/Header" for change notification. An attachment has been added to that page by es20490446e. Following detailed information is available: Attachment name: Logo.svg Attachment size: 12832 Attachment link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Weekend/Header?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=Logo.svg Page link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Weekend/Header From noreply at ubuntu.com Mon Feb 24 12:15:23 2014 From: noreply at ubuntu.com (Ubuntu Wiki) Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 12:15:23 -0000 Subject: =?utf-8?q?New_attachment_added_to_page_Bugs/Ubuntu_Bug_Weekend/Header_on_?= =?utf-8?q?Ubuntu_Wiki?= Message-ID: <20140224121523.29492.1233@mangaba.canonical.com> Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page "Bugs/Ubuntu Bug Weekend/Header" for change notification. An attachment has been added to that page by es20490446e. Following detailed information is available: Attachment name: Logo.svg Attachment size: 12862 Attachment link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Weekend/Header?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=Logo.svg Page link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Weekend/Header From noreply at ubuntu.com Mon Feb 24 12:16:47 2014 From: noreply at ubuntu.com (Ubuntu Wiki) Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 12:16:47 -0000 Subject: =?utf-8?q?New_attachment_added_to_page_Bugs/Ubuntu_Bug_Weekend/Header_on_?= =?utf-8?q?Ubuntu_Wiki?= Message-ID: <20140224121647.29498.63924@mangaba.canonical.com> Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page "Bugs/Ubuntu Bug Weekend/Header" for change notification. An attachment has been added to that page by es20490446e. Following detailed information is available: Attachment name: Logo.svg Attachment size: 12862 Attachment link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Weekend/Header?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=Logo.svg Page link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Weekend/Header From noreply at ubuntu.com Mon Feb 24 12:07:03 2014 From: noreply at ubuntu.com (Ubuntu Wiki) Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 12:07:03 -0000 Subject: =?utf-8?q?New_attachment_added_to_page_Bugs/Ubuntu_Bug_Weekend/Header_on_?= =?utf-8?q?Ubuntu_Wiki?= Message-ID: <20140224120703.29485.22427@mangaba.canonical.com> Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page "Bugs/Ubuntu Bug Weekend/Header" for change notification. An attachment has been added to that page by es20490446e. Following detailed information is available: Attachment name: Ubuntu Bug Week Logo.png Attachment size: 43947 Attachment link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Weekend/Header?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=Ubuntu+Bug+Week+Logo.png Page link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Weekend/Header From noreply at ubuntu.com Mon Feb 24 12:10:26 2014 From: noreply at ubuntu.com (Ubuntu Wiki) Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 12:10:26 -0000 Subject: =?utf-8?q?New_attachment_added_to_page_Bugs/Ubuntu_Bug_Weekend/Header_on_?= =?utf-8?q?Ubuntu_Wiki?= Message-ID: <20140224121026.29498.69155@mangaba.canonical.com> Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page "Bugs/Ubuntu Bug Weekend/Header" for change notification. An attachment has been added to that page by es20490446e. Following detailed information is available: Attachment name: Logo.png Attachment size: 19301 Attachment link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Weekend/Header?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=Logo.png Page link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Weekend/Header From noreply at ubuntu.com Mon Feb 24 12:15:11 2014 From: noreply at ubuntu.com (Ubuntu Wiki) Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 12:15:11 -0000 Subject: =?utf-8?q?New_attachment_added_to_page_Bugs/Ubuntu_Bug_Weekend/Header_on_?= =?utf-8?q?Ubuntu_Wiki?= Message-ID: <20140224121511.29492.90017@mangaba.canonical.com> Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page "Bugs/Ubuntu Bug Weekend/Header" for change notification. An attachment has been added to that page by es20490446e. Following detailed information is available: Attachment name: Logo.png Attachment size: 22930 Attachment link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Weekend/Header?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=Logo.png Page link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Weekend/Header From noreply at ubuntu.com Mon Feb 24 12:16:37 2014 From: noreply at ubuntu.com (Ubuntu Wiki) Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 12:16:37 -0000 Subject: =?utf-8?q?New_attachment_added_to_page_Bugs/Ubuntu_Bug_Weekend/Header_on_?= =?utf-8?q?Ubuntu_Wiki?= Message-ID: <20140224121637.29467.77145@mangaba.canonical.com> Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page "Bugs/Ubuntu Bug Weekend/Header" for change notification. An attachment has been added to that page by es20490446e. Following detailed information is available: Attachment name: Logo.png Attachment size: 22930 Attachment link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Weekend/Header?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=Logo.png Page link: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Weekend/Header From noreply at ubuntu.com Mon Feb 24 12:37:24 2014 From: noreply at ubuntu.com (Ubuntu Wiki) Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 12:37:24 -0000 Subject: =?utf-8?q?=5BUbuntu_Wiki=5D_Update_of_=22Bugs/Ubuntu_Bug_Weekend=22_by_es?= =?utf-8?q?20490446e?= Message-ID: <20140224123724.32319.42429@mangaba.canonical.com> Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Ubuntu Wiki" for change notification. The "Bugs/Ubuntu Bug Weekend" page has been changed by es20490446e: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Weekend?action=diff&rev1=31&rev2=32 ## Status: new ## Importance: undecided, critical, high, medium, low ## Tags: trusty - * [[https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Week/Confirm%20bugs%20contributors|List of contributors]] + * [[https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Ubuntu%20Bug%20Weekend/Confirm%20bugs%20contributors|List of contributors]] * [[/Confirm bugs|How to do]] * '''Ideal for''': non Ubuntu Bug Control members or programmers From es20490446e at gmail.com Mon Feb 24 18:19:26 2014 From: es20490446e at gmail.com (Alberto Salvia Novella) Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 19:19:26 +0100 Subject: Ubuntu Bug Weekend In-Reply-To: <52F44966.8000807@gmail.com> References: <52F44966.8000807@gmail.com> Message-ID: <530B8D2E.90404@gmail.com> 🐞 UBUNTU BUG WEEKEND ** * What is the Ubuntu Bug Weekend* As said by Joel Spolsky, *good software* usually takes 10 years to become well made. Now *time has arrived* to Ubuntu, the most popular Linux based operating system in the world (see the video ). So the Ubuntu Bug Weekend *is an event* aimed to harden our 10th anniversary Ubuntu LTS release; and make Trusty Tahr not only the flagship of the Ubuntu Community, but the most amazing experience in computing. It is designed to have *easy and enjoyable* tasks which nearly everyone can take, but with a great impact in overall system quality. It is also a great *opportunity* for computer enthusiasts to get in touch with how the most popular libre operating system in the world is made. Bug Week will last two days: from *Friday 07-03* to *Sunday 09-03* ( Smile :) Speak With Us! ). Prizes Additionally, for making the event more challenging, the person who contributed in more bugs in each list (what we will review for errors) will be able to choose from one of the following *prizes*: An Ubuntu Design Mug http://shop.canonical.com/product_info.php?products_id=1127 http://shop.canonical.com/product_info.php?products_id=1126 Next Indie Humble Bundle full (to be launched) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humble_Bundle /Have a nice day. Hope to see you soon with us! //Wink ;)/ ---------- 📨 Please, consider passing this mail (hiding recipients addresses) to people you'll know they will be interested in it. If you're a computing student, please pass it to your faculty. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Header Type: image/png Size: 22930 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: icon_smile.png Type: image/png Size: 385 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: UBN30046-1.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 68375 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: UBN30045-1.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 67313 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 2459117-humble+bundle+-+logo+vertical.png Type: image/png Size: 206928 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: icon_wink.png Type: image/png Size: 388 bytes Desc: not available URL: From bhanuc at iitk.ac.in Fri Feb 28 18:15:31 2014 From: bhanuc at iitk.ac.in (bhanuc) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 23:45:31 +0530 Subject: screen freezes on restart, start after shutdown and even sometimes even during shutdown Message-ID: <5310D243.7070105@iitk.ac.in> Hi all, I have Lenevo Y500 , with ubuntu 14.04 installed on SSD (only storage device) with Nvidia 650m with graphics driver version 331.49 . My system is fully updated and I update almost daily. Some backstory- Installed 14.04 , installed nvidia driver then after a restart unity launcher disappeared. I reinstalled nvidia driver( this had happened in 13.10 and this has fixed it ) , no change so I instead of using compiz-plugins I decided to install ubuntu-gnome and gnome-shell. This fixed that problem but now when-ever I restarted ,after the lenevo boot screen my screen freezes onto nothing and I have to force-shutdown and restart it again which instead of leading to that freeze screen it leads to grub screen and then ubuntu loads gracefully. But recently the system started freezing even while shutting down. There is no automatic error getting generated (so cannot log a bug ) nor did I see any fishy in my system log. Can anyone please help. I am kind of a newbie with all this so please let me know where should I start looking to solve this problem. I have attached all kinds of logs which I could find . Thanks Warm Regards Bhanu Pratap Chaudhary -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: logs.tar.gz Type: application/gzip Size: 277291 bytes Desc: not available URL: