[Ubuntu-bugcontrol] Please, consider reflecting on the Canonical Contributor Agreement

phillip phillip.szelat at gmail.com
Tue Dec 30 01:15:40 UTC 2014


What I don't understand is:

"2.3 Outbound License

Based on the grant of rights in Sections 2.1 and 2.2, if We
include Your Contribution in a Material, We may license the
Contribution under any license, including copyleft,
permissive, commercial, or proprietary licenses."

There is absolutely no reason to license it as proprietary software in the future? 

Why not just use something like:

"We may license the
Contribution under any free and opensoure license" ?


More information about the Ubuntu-bugsquad mailing list