From webmaster at ubuntu.com Sat Jun 8 13:47:27 2013 From: webmaster at ubuntu.com (Help Ubuntu) Date: Sat, 08 Jun 2013 13:47:27 -0000 Subject: =?utf-8?q?=5BCommunity_Ubuntu_Documentation=5D_Update_of_=22ReportingBugs?= =?utf-8?q?=22_by_penalvch?= Message-ID: <20130608134727.27072.34642@jostaberry.canonical.com> Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Community Ubuntu Documentation" for change notification. The "ReportingBugs" page has been changed by penalvch: http://help.ubuntu.com/community/ReportingBugs?action=diff&rev1=232&rev2=233 Comment: Added etiquette support note regarding appropriate use of Launchpad projects due to LP# 1184698. Many of the triagers and developers who are providing support to you, '''are volunteers doing so out of altruism'''. Please keep this in mind when making your comments. <
><
> Please '''do not report bugs about software in [[PPA]]s''' on Launchpad. This is because software in PPAs are not provided by the official Ubuntu repositories. Instead, the PPA homepage would have a contact point and preference of the PPA provider. + <
><
> + Please do not add project tasks to bug reports that are invalid because they are not supported. For example, if you were using the LibreOffice PPA and reported a bug against the package libreoffice (Ubuntu), which would be marked Status Invalid, please do not add the Launchpad Project [[https://launchpad.net/df-libreoffice|df-libreoffice]] to the report, or change the package libreoffice (Ubuntu) to the project df-libreoffice. The purposes of adding the upstream project to a report is to track valid bugs in Ubuntu that are valid upstream, and may have been reported upstream, not to start another upstream bug tracker. = How to report bugs = From webmaster at ubuntu.com Sat Jun 22 14:48:19 2013 From: webmaster at ubuntu.com (Help Ubuntu) Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 14:48:19 -0000 Subject: =?utf-8?q?=5BCommunity_Ubuntu_Documentation=5D_Update_of_=22ReportingBugs?= =?utf-8?q?=22_by_torsten=2Efranz?= Message-ID: <20130622144819.23824.54905@jostaberry.canonical.com> Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Community Ubuntu Documentation" for change notification. The "ReportingBugs" page has been changed by torsten.franz: http://help.ubuntu.com/community/ReportingBugs?action=diff&rev1=233&rev2=234 Comment: updated Ubuntu versions == Make sure the bug hasn’t already been reported == First, check the release notes for your version of Ubuntu: - * [[http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/releasenotes/804|Ubuntu 8.04 LTS (Hardy Heron)]] * [[http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/releasenotes/1004|Ubuntu 10.04 LTS (Lucid Lynx)]] - * [[http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/releasenotes/1110|Ubuntu 11.10 (Oneiric Ocelot)]] * [[http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/releasenotes/1204|Ubuntu 12.04 LTS (Precise Pangolin)]] * [[http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/releasenotes/1210|Ubuntu 12.10 (Quantal Quetzal)]] + * [[http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/releasenotes/1210|Ubuntu 13.04 (Raring Ringtail)]] === Hardware driver bugs (e.g. sound, Linux kernel, X.Org, and Nvidia / AMD proprietary drivers) === From chilicuil at ubuntu.com Tue Jun 25 15:08:50 2013 From: chilicuil at ubuntu.com (Javier Lopez) Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 10:08:50 -0500 Subject: Pending approval Message-ID: <20130625150848.GA7175@quantal-i386.local.lan> Hi there, I received an email from one of the persons waiting for approval in the bugsquad team, then I've reviewed the complete list and noticed that some of them have been waiting for 2 months. https://launchpad.net/~bugsquad/+members#proposed I'm not sure if it's lack of time or if they have just not been approved, if it's the first one I can help to make sure they meet the requirements. Have a nice day From hggdh2 at ubuntu.com Thu Jun 27 02:16:18 2013 From: hggdh2 at ubuntu.com (C de-Avillez) Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 21:16:18 -0500 Subject: Pending approval In-Reply-To: <20130625150848.GA7175@quantal-i386.local.lan> References: <20130625150848.GA7175@quantal-i386.local.lan> Message-ID: <20130626211618.7482ac8e@xango3> On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 10:08:50 -0500 Javier Lopez wrote: > Hi there, > > I received an email from one of the persons waiting for approval in > the bugsquad team, then I've reviewed the complete list and noticed > that some of them have been waiting for 2 months. > > https://launchpad.net/~bugsquad/+members#proposed > > I'm not sure if it's lack of time or if they have just not been > approved, if it's the first one I can help to make sure they meet the > requirements. > > Have a nice day > I will look into it now. For all the bugsquad admins, I beg the requesters' pardon. ..C.. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: not available URL: From hggdh2 at ubuntu.com Thu Jun 27 02:26:06 2013 From: hggdh2 at ubuntu.com (C de-Avillez) Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 21:26:06 -0500 Subject: Pending approval In-Reply-To: <20130626211618.7482ac8e@xango3> References: <20130625150848.GA7175@quantal-i386.local.lan> <20130626211618.7482ac8e@xango3> Message-ID: <20130626212606.524aab5f@xango3> On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 21:16:18 -0500 C de-Avillez wrote: > On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 10:08:50 -0500 > Javier Lopez wrote: > > > Hi there, > > > > I received an email from one of the persons waiting for approval in > > the bugsquad team, then I've reviewed the complete list and noticed > > that some of them have been waiting for 2 months. > > > > https://launchpad.net/~bugsquad/+members#proposed > > > > I'm not sure if it's lack of time or if they have just not been > > approved, if it's the first one I can help to make sure they meet > > the requirements. > > > > Have a nice day > > > > I will look into it now. For all the bugsquad admins, I beg the > requesters' pardon. > > ..C.. ALL pending requests have been worked on. ALl approved, except two that did not sign the CoC (a requirement for joining). Javier -- thank you for the heads up, and I do apologise for the delay. ..C.. -- ab alio expectes alteri quod feceris -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: not available URL: From chilicuil at ubuntu.com Thu Jun 27 16:45:21 2013 From: chilicuil at ubuntu.com (Javier Lopez) Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 11:45:21 -0500 Subject: Pending approval In-Reply-To: <20130626212606.524aab5f@xango3> References: <20130625150848.GA7175@quantal-i386.local.lan> <20130626211618.7482ac8e@xango3> <20130626212606.524aab5f@xango3> Message-ID: <20130627164520.GA7490@quantal-i386.local.lan> On 26/06/13 at 09:26pm, C de-Avillez wrote: > ALL pending requests have been worked on. ALl approved, except two that > did not sign the CoC (a requirement for joining). > > Javier -- thank you for the heads up, and I do apologise for the delay. Awesome, thanks! =) > > ..C.. > > -- > ab alio expectes alteri quod feceris From kensubuntu at gmail.com Thu Jun 27 18:25:05 2013 From: kensubuntu at gmail.com (Ken) Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 14:25:05 -0400 Subject: Pending approval In-Reply-To: <20130627164520.GA7490@quantal-i386.local.lan> References: <20130625150848.GA7175@quantal-i386.local.lan> <20130626211618.7482ac8e@xango3> <20130626212606.524aab5f@xango3> <20130627164520.GA7490@quantal-i386.local.lan> Message-ID: <20130627182505.GA1453@mercury.home> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:45:21AM -0500, Javier Lopez wrote: > On 26/06/13 at 09:26pm, C de-Avillez wrote: > > ALL pending requests have been worked on. ALl approved, except two that > > did not sign the CoC (a requirement for joining). > > > > Javier -- thank you for the heads up, and I do apologise for the delay. > Thank you for he approval. Ken -- Surprise your boss. Get to work on time.