epiphany vs epiphany-browser

[Brian Murray]

On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 08:28:12AM -0500, Micah Gersten wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On 05/19/2010 06:03 PM, Nigel Babu wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 10:52 -0700, Brian Murray wrote:
> >> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 09:31:47PM +0530, Nigel Babu wrote:
> >>> Hello folks:
> >>>
> >>> Just giving out an alert
> >>>
> <snip />
> >>>
> >>> The browser is epiphany-browser, *not* epiphany
> >>
> >>
> >> What prompted this alert are bugs misfiled about one package versus the
> >> other?  Maybe there is something that can be done to resolve this if so.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Brian Murray
> >> Ubuntu Bug Master
> > 
> > Over the past few mpnths, its always getting filed against epiphany and
> > someone redirects.  Yesterday a bug guided from no package to epiphany
> > instead of epiphany-browser, hence the alert.
> > 
> > Warm Regards
> > Nigel Babu
> 
> Brian, can you add a message to the epiphany package bug submsision page
> that mentions something like "If you are trying to report a bug against
> the Epiphany Browser, the correct package is epiphany browser. Please
> run ubuntu-bug epiphany-browser"

Yes, that'd be easy however this wouldn't help the particular problem, as
I understand it, which is the assignment of "no package" bug reports to
epiphany instead of epiphany-browser.
 
--
Brian Murray
Ubuntu Bug Master
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-bugsquad/attachments/20100521/50b01a92/attachment.pgp