epiphany vs epiphany-browser

[Brian Murray]

On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 09:31:47PM +0530, Nigel Babu wrote:
> Hello folks:
> 
> Just giving out an alert
> 
> == epiphany ==
> Package: epiphany
> Section: universe/games
> Description: clone of Boulder Dash game
>  Epiphany is a multi-platform clone of Boulder Dash.
>  In this game, the player must collect all the valuable minerals
>  scattered in each level, while avoiding being hit by a falling
>  boulder or, worse, by a bomb.
>  .
>  Boulder Dash was one of the best games ever made for the
>  Commodore 64.
> 
> == epiphany-browser ==
> Package: epiphany-browser
> Section: universe/gnome
> Description: Intuitive GNOME web browser
>  Epiphany is a simple yet powerful GNOME web browser targeted at
>  non-technical users. Its principles are simplicity and standards
>  compliance. Simplicity is achieved by a well designed user interface
>  and reliance on external applications for performing external tasks
>  (such as reading email). Simplicity should not mean less powerful.
>  Standards compliance is achieved on the HTML side by using the
>  WebKitGTK+ rendering engine; and on the user interface side by
>  closely following the GNOME Human Interface Guidelines (HIG) and by
>  close integration with the GNOME desktop.
> 
> The browser is epiphany-browser, *not* epiphany


What prompted this alert are bugs misfiled about one package versus the
other?  Maybe there is something that can be done to resolve this if so.

--
Brian Murray
Ubuntu Bug Master
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-bugsquad/attachments/20100519/4907c9fc/attachment.sig>