epiphany vs epiphany-browser

[Nigel Babu]

On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 10:52 -0700, Brian Murray wrote:
> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 09:31:47PM +0530, Nigel Babu wrote:
> > Hello folks:
> > 
> > Just giving out an alert
> > 
> > == epiphany ==
> > Package: epiphany
> > Section: universe/games
> > Description: clone of Boulder Dash game
> >  Epiphany is a multi-platform clone of Boulder Dash.
> >  In this game, the player must collect all the valuable minerals
> >  scattered in each level, while avoiding being hit by a falling
> >  boulder or, worse, by a bomb.
> >  .
> >  Boulder Dash was one of the best games ever made for the
> >  Commodore 64.
> > 
> > == epiphany-browser ==
> > Package: epiphany-browser
> > Section: universe/gnome
> > Description: Intuitive GNOME web browser
> >  Epiphany is a simple yet powerful GNOME web browser targeted at
> >  non-technical users. Its principles are simplicity and standards
> >  compliance. Simplicity is achieved by a well designed user interface
> >  and reliance on external applications for performing external tasks
> >  (such as reading email). Simplicity should not mean less powerful.
> >  Standards compliance is achieved on the HTML side by using the
> >  WebKitGTK+ rendering engine; and on the user interface side by
> >  closely following the GNOME Human Interface Guidelines (HIG) and by
> >  close integration with the GNOME desktop.
> > 
> > The browser is epiphany-browser, *not* epiphany
> 
> 
> What prompted this alert are bugs misfiled about one package versus the
> other?  Maybe there is something that can be done to resolve this if so.
> 
> --
> Brian Murray
> Ubuntu Bug Master

Over the past few mpnths, its always getting filed against epiphany and
someone redirects.  Yesterday a bug guided from no package to epiphany
instead of epiphany-browser, hence the alert.

Warm Regards
Nigel Babu